Re: [CentOS] Gnome weather applet stranded

isdtor wrote: > The Gnome weather report applet has ceased working on CentOS5/6. > http://weather.noaa.gov/ says "This service is no longer available". Are > there any good alternatives? I liked the applet as it allowed the use of a > custom radar map. > > As I just discovered, the weather

Re: [CentOS] Transparent HugePages question

Laurentiu Soica wrote: > Hello, > > I have a CentOS 7 installation on baremetal with 2 CPUs, 10 cores each and > HT enabled, 128 GB RAM. > > The system has transparent hugetables enabled. > So it turns out that even is I have the THP enabled the pages still have a > size of 4K . > > Is there any

Re: [CentOS] howto install yumex

Hal Wigoda wrote: > Ignore the law. > > "Sorry but your password must contain an uppercase letter, a number, > a haiku, a gang sign, a heiroglyph, > and the blood of a virgin." What, the blood of a rubber chicken isn't good enough any more? And where are you going to *find* a virgin...?

[CentOS] OT: trying to configure Ubuntu 14 to use dhcp

This is very much *not* CentOS, but if anyone knows how to do it *correctly*, please drop me an email offlist. mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] ssh & ksh question [RESOLVED]

Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 08/09/2016 10:35 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> it gags on >> ssh system2 <> blah, blah >> EOF. >> >> Mostly, I have a multiline awk script in the script, with \ at the end >> of each line > > You are probably overlooking that in bash, "here documents" are subject > to

Re: [CentOS] LSI SATA MegaRaid & Centos 7 build 1511

Fawzy Ibrhim wrote: > I have opened the case of the server and it's LSI card with FakeRaid !! > > What I have to do now as lspci shows it as intel cards? If you're responding to my comment, you seem to have misunderstood me. The only servers I had that offered fakeRAID were Intel motherboards,

Re: [CentOS] ssh & ksh question

David Both wrote: > Try: > > ssh system2 "`cat test.script`" > > That works for me. Thanks, but that's pretty much what I'm trying with the HERE document. Trouble is, I have a) an sqlquery, o/p piped into b) awk, which I do as one line, breaking it with terminating \ (to make it readable),

[CentOS] ssh & ksh question

I need to run a report, source file on system 1, on system 2. I'd like to do this in one script, not have a second script to run it. Now cat script | ssh system2 works fine. But no matter what I've tried, it gags on ssh system2

Re: [CentOS] LSI SATA MegaRaid & Centos 7 build 1511

Fawzy Ibrhim wrote: > It's fakeRAID but I do not know why there's no LSI cards in lspci output > !! > In the past, the fakeRAID that I've run into were Intel chips, not an LSI card. mark > To manage the disks; I have to use the LSI Sata Megaraid fireware; so is > there any hope to install

Re: [CentOS] C7 Backup problem

Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Tue, August 9, 2016 1:11 am, Alessandro Baggi wrote: >> Good morning list, >> I've a question about backup performed with bacula. >> I manage a DELL server (dedicated on provider) with C7. I use bacula as >> backup system with volumes on disk. System performs mon-sat

Re: [CentOS] curl build system is broken and so is mock

Always Learning wrote: > > On Thu, 2016-08-04 at 09:46 -0400, James B. Byrne wrote: >> On Wed, August 3, 2016 22:53, Alice Wonder wrote: >> > >> > I didn't realize ldd was recursive. I may have known that at one >> > point (been using linux since MK Linux DR3 and building RPMs since >> > 1999),

Re: [CentOS] TLSv1.2 support for lftp on CentOS 6.x

My good man Olivier BONHOMME wrote: > Hello everybody, > > I am writing on that mailing list because I have an issue using lftp and I > would > love to have more infos about features available on the LFTP version > provided by > CentOS 6. > > I try to connect to a ftp server in secured mode

[CentOS] CentOS 6, portreserve

Hi, folks, Got a question: I's swear that I just started seeing rkhunter complaining about ports 110, 143, and 995 only a few weeks, maybe as much as a month ago. (It's been way low on my priority list to solve.) Anyway, with my manager urging us about it, I looked, and found that portreserve

[CentOS] SAS drive not showing [SOLVED]

*Finally* found the answer. The case was, if you'll recall, that I had replaced a pair of older, smaller drives with a couple of 8TB SATA drives, and made it RAID1 using the PERC firmware. I was then going to wipe the drive. First, the old ones turned out to be SAS, no SATA. I had tried shoving it

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.7->6.8, ssh-add issue, followup, more info

Denniston, Todd A CIV NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane wrote: > Tue Jul 26 21:17:40 UTC 2016, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> I could try the reinstall, but it's very odd - everything worked, and >> now, after the upgrade, it doesn't. Oh, and here's another twist on this: >> Under 6.7, if I'd logged into my

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 and an SAS drive, hardware

John R Pierce wrote: > On 7/26/2016 2:38 PM, Peter wrote: >> On 27/07/16 09:11,m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >>> >This is... odd. Got a 6.8 box, a Dell R320 lspci tells me >>> >01:00.0 RAID bus controller: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic MegaRAID SAS >>> 2008 [Falcon] (rev 03) >>> >so it*should* accept an

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.7->6.8, ssh-add issue, followup, more info

Denniston, Todd A CIV NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane wrote: >> From: m.r...@5-cent.us [mailto:m.r...@5-cent.us] >> Sent: Friday, July 22, 2016 4:15 PM >> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> > >> >I am perplexed. I updated my workstation at work Wed before I left, >> > from 6.7 to 6.8. Then, yesterday, I went

[CentOS] CentOS 6 and an SAS drive, hardware

This is... odd. Got a 6.8 box, a Dell R320 lspci tells me 01:00.0 RAID bus controller: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic MegaRAID SAS 2008 [Falcon] (rev 03) so it *should* accept an SAS drive. I've got a Cheetah that's a few years old, and having pulled it out of another server (in the datecenter), I put

Re: [CentOS] LSI SATA MegaRaid & Centos 7 build 1511

John R Pierce wrote: > On 7/26/2016 10:20 AM, Fawzy Ibrhim wrote: >> I want to install Centos 7 latest build on NEC Server 5800/120b-2. >> >> The installation wizard fails to detect the storage connected to LSI >> SATA MegaRaid PCI. > > which megaraid card? they've made quite a lot. lspci will

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6, iscsi issue, [SOLVED]

m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Hi, folks, > >Ok, I had iscsi working. Then I umounted the filesystem, and deleted > the logical volume, then the RAID, and recreated it with a) 4 more > drives (or was it six?), gave it a new RG name, and a new VD name. > >I can ping the IP, but can't rediscover

[CentOS] CentOS 6, iscsi issue

Hi, folks, Ok, I had iscsi working. Then I umounted the filesystem, and deleted the logical volume, then the RAID, and recreated it with a) 4 more drives (or was it six?), gave it a new RG name, and a new VD name. I can ping the IP, but can't rediscover it - just get "no portals found".

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.7->6.8, ssh-add issue, followup, more info

m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Folks, > >I am perplexed. I updated my workstation at work Wed before I left, > from 6.7 to 6.8. Then, yesterday, I went to use ssh-add -s > libcoolkeypk11.so, which I've done many times before to add the certs > from my PIV card... and 100% of the time if fails,

[CentOS] CentOS 6.7->6.8, ssh-add issue

Folks, I am perplexed. I updated my workstation at work Wed before I left, from 6.7 to 6.8. Then, yesterday, I went to use ssh-add -s libcoolkeypk11.so, which I've done many times before to add the certs from my PIV card... and 100% of the time if fails, letting me SSH_AGENT_FAILURE, cannot

Re: [CentOS] ?barracuda? listing in logwatch session 123 of user root.

Mark Milhollan wrote: > On Tue, 19 Jul 2016, Jon LaBadie wrote: > >>My nightly logwatch report had a never before seen >>section last night, "barracuda spam firewall". >> >>I have not problem with the emails it noted as >>being rejected. But I've always thought of "barracuda" >>as a commercial

Re: [CentOS] users unable to log into kde after 6.8 update

James B. Byrne wrote: > > On Thu, July 21, 2016 07:56, Jose Maria Terry Jimenez wrote: >> El 21/7/16 a las 8:53, geo.inbox.ignore escribió: >> >>> greetings to all. >>> >>> centos = 6.8 current >>> system = toshiba l455d-s5976 laptop >>> >>> a new problem has developed after 1st updating of 6.8.

Re: [CentOS] command line file completion on CentOS 7

John Hodrien wrote: > On Thu, 14 Jul 2016, Jerry Geis wrote: > >> Why are they not the same? > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1296366 > Not just more for me - in odd cases, not all the time, but on some of our servers, and no, I don't remember if they're C6 or c7, sometimes filec

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6, mptfusion software? sort of solved

More googling, and then something I wouldn't have thought of: smartctl doesn't work on this HBA against /dev/sd*. HOWEVER, it's happy as a clam against /dev/sgx, and there's my RAID, /dev/sg0 and /dev/sg1 (which lshw also was able to show me), but now, at least, I can run smartctl tests on the

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6, mptfusion software?

Hi, John, John R Pierce wrote: > On 7/12/2016 10:19 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> Got an older Dell R410, with an LSI 1068E PCI-Express Fusion-MPT SAS >> (rev 08). It*appears* that a) trying MegaRaid, and b) from what I'm >> googling, that what I need are mptfusion-related packages. >>

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6, mptfusion software?

Hey, Valeri, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Tue, July 12, 2016 12:19 pm, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> >>Got an older Dell R410, with an LSI 1068E PCI-Express Fusion-MPT SAS >> (rev 08). It *appears* that a) trying MegaRaid, and b) from what I'm >> googling, that what I need are mptfusion-related

[CentOS] CentOS 6, mptfusion software?

Hi, folks, Got an older Dell R410, with an LSI 1068E PCI-Express Fusion-MPT SAS (rev 08). It *appears* that a) trying MegaRaid, and b) from what I'm googling, that what I need are mptfusion-related packages. Unfortunately, yum shows me nothing available in base, epel, or rpmfusion. Am I

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6, iscsi,

Hi, Todd, Denniston, Todd A CIV NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane wrote: > Thu Jul 7 14:47:23 UTC 2016, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> >>I installed the iscsi packages, and I *thought* that the first thing >> to do was configure /etc/tgt/target.conf. Am I wrong? Did I have to >> configure iSNS on the

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6, iscsi, followup question

m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Hi, folks, > >I installed the iscsi packages, and I *thought* that the first thing to > do was configure /etc/tgt/target.conf. Am I wrong? Did I have to > configure iSNS on the RAID appliance? > >All that I find on the web, incl. upstream docs, is to install it,

[CentOS] CentOS 6, iscsi,

Hi, folks, I installed the iscsi packages, and I *thought* that the first thing to do was configure /etc/tgt/target.conf. Am I wrong? Did I have to configure iSNS on the RAID appliance? All that I find on the web, incl. upstream docs, is to install it, then start the service. What am I

Re: [CentOS] OT: hardware, MegaRAID SAS 2008 (falcon) [SOLVED]

Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Thu, June 30, 2016 2:59 pm, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> I've been googling, and haven't yet found the answer: does anyone here >> know if a MegaRAID SAS 2008 (falcon) (rev 03) can handle drives bigger >> than 2TB? > > One way to find out is to plug 4TB drive and take a

[CentOS] OT: hardware, MegaRAID SAS 2008 (falcon)

I've been googling, and haven't yet found the answer: does anyone here know if a MegaRAID SAS 2008 (falcon) (rev 03) can handle drives bigger than 2TB? mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] VNC server issue- Gnome - oh no! Something has gone wrong

Hersh wrote: > Hi All, > > The other thing we have noticed after booting is, screen is completely > blank. GUI is not visible on attached monitor. > > We tried switching between different terminals using (Ctl+Alt+F1-12). F2-6 > are showing command line terminals but, others are returning blank

Re: [CentOS] sssd.conf file missing

Kaplan, Andrew H. wrote: > Hello - > > I have made the following changes to the nsswitch.conf file as suggested > by another mailing-list member: > > Domain = .org > ... > Method = nsswitch > > and I have restarted idmapd service. > > I also ran the following command syntax as root to check the

Re: [CentOS] sssd.conf file missing

Kaplan, Andrew H. wrote: > Hello -- > > I have not touched that file. > > What change(s) do I need to make there? > Please stop top posting. That *may* affect you later, when you try to NFS mount directories, or it may be confusing the issue. In any case, it *requires* editing. First, put in a

Re: [CentOS] sssd.conf file missing

Kaplan, Andrew H. wrote: > Hello -- > > I made the suggested changes to the sssd.conf file, and the results are > the same. > > Just to make sure my syntax is correct: > > The following section was added to the end of the file: > > [sssd] > debug_level = 4 > config_file_version = 2 > domains =

Re: [CentOS] KVM HA

Digimer wrote: > On 22/06/16 02:01 PM, Chris Adams wrote: >> Once upon a time, John R Pierce said: >>> On 6/22/2016 10:47 AM, Digimer wrote: This is called "fabric fencing" and was originally the only supported option in the very early days of HA. It has fallen out

Re: [CentOS] Package NetworkManager-libreswan-0.9.8.0-5.el7.x86_64.rpm is not signed

John R Pierce wrote: > On 6/21/2016 10:57 AM, Jules Bashizi wrote: >> How to inst that Network manager please > > where is that unsigned package from?its not part of the standard > repository, the standard network manager is... > > NetworkManager-1.0.6-29.el7_2.x86_64.rpm > I think perhaps

Re: [CentOS] netbook screen suddenly goes black

Fred Smith wrote: > On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 04:13:35PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> Fred Smith wrote: >> > On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 02:59:29PM -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 08:58:54AM -0400, Fred Smith wrote: >> >> > On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 01:34:30PM +0300, Александр

Re: [CentOS] netbook screen suddenly goes black

Fred Smith wrote: > On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 02:59:29PM -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 08:58:54AM -0400, Fred Smith wrote: >> > On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 01:34:30PM +0300, Александр Кириллов wrote: >> > > >Can anyone of you provide further hints on what I should be looking >> >

Re: [CentOS] netbook screen suddenly goes black

Dr. Mikeal Hughes wrote: > Motherboard time. Netbook is probably a throw away issue. Cost more t to > repair than buy new. > >> On Jun 20, 2016, at 7:58 AM, Fred Smith >> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 01:34:30PM +0300, Александр Кириллов wrote: Can

Re: [CentOS] netbook screen suddenly goes black

Fred Smith wrote: > On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 01:34:30PM +0300, Александр Кириллов wrote: >> >Can anyone of you provide further hints on what I should be looking >> >for or at? >> >> Is it trying to hibernate? > > gosh, I hope not! I was in the middle of using it, playing solitaire > and moving the

Re: [CentOS] Speaking of firefox updates

John Hodrien wrote: > On Fri, 17 Jun 2016, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > >> Btw, I did just update flash-plugin. Does anyone know what the issue was >> that caused the video issues in the first release of 45, and whether >> those issues were resolved? Also, were they occurring in C7? Unless that's the

Re: [CentOS] Speaking of firefox updates

John Hodrien wrote: > On Fri, 17 Jun 2016, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > >> I haven't gone past 38, because when the 45 update came out, and >> video...like, say, my *required* training from work, when I tried >> to run it, it crashed firefox. Repeatedly. 100% of the time. >> >> Has anyone been using

Re: [CentOS] Speaking of firefox updates

John Hodrien wrote: > On Fri, 17 Jun 2016, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > >> I haven't gone past 38, because when the 45 update came out, and >> video...like, say, my *required* training from work, when I tried to >> run it, it crashed firefox. Repeatedly. 100% of the time. >> >> Has anyone been using

[CentOS] Speaking of firefox updates

I haven't gone past 38, because when the 45 update came out, and video... like, say, my *required* training from work, when I tried to run it, it crashed firefox. Repeatedly. 100% of the time. Has anyone been using the current version had trouble with video, etc? I'd like to update, but not if I

Re: [CentOS] https and self signed

Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Thu, June 16, 2016 1:09 pm, Gordon Messmer wrote: >> On 06/16/2016 10:53 AM, Walter H. wrote: >>> lets encrypt only trusts for 3 months; would you really except in an >>> onlineshop, someone trusts this shop? >>> let us think something like this: "when the CA only

Re: [CentOS] yum timeout ... (CentOS 6.8)

Walter H. wrote: > Hello, > > the last times, when I tried to update, > > it get time outs; even when 'yum list' > how or where can I reset this behavour, to have the really fastest mirros > used? > Have you tried yum clean all before reruning? mark

Re: [CentOS] https and self signed

John Hodrien wrote: > On Wed, 15 Jun 2016, John R Pierce wrote: > >> On 6/15/2016 6:47 AM, Jerry Geis wrote: >>> How do I get past this? I was looking to just self sign for https. >> >> in my admittedly limited experience with this stuff, you need to create >> your own rootCA, and use that to

Re: [CentOS] remote backup

John R Pierce wrote: > On 6/9/2016 1:16 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> That's what "middle of the night maintenance window" is for. > > in today's 24/7 global business world, there is no middle of the night, > its midday *somewhere*. > You pick the least buy day/time. For example, when I was

Re: [CentOS] remote backup

Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 06/09/2016 11:43 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> When databases are concerned, I would never rely on a snapshot of their >> storage files. Either stop relevant daemon(s), then do fs snapshot, or >> better though do dbdump and restore databases from dump when you need to >>

Re: [CentOS] setting up auto logout in CentOS 6

Vanhorn, Mike wrote: > I would like to have my lab workstations logout a session after the person > has been idle for a certain period of time. After some searching on the > web, I got into > > /etc/gconf/schemas/gnome-session.schemas Seems really complicated. I run KDE, and I believe there's

Re: [CentOS] firewall-config not functional

Frank Cox wrote: > On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 17:20:23 -0400 > m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > >> Um, huh? ssh server;service network restart is certainly faster than a >> reboot. > > By what magical incantation will you ssh into a server with no current > network connection? > Plugging in my

[CentOS] CentOS 6, gdb

Got a user who claims he was running this program, then it broke recently. Almost no updates in a while, and none relevant. I'm guessing the program's compiled from fortran to c Anyway, the issue's on two servers. On one, I installed a couple of compat libs, and it runs. The other still fails

Re: [CentOS] firewall-config not functional

Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Jun 7, 2016, at 13:03, Emmett Culley > wrote: >> >> I can see no use case for NetwortManager on our systems. All network >> connections are static. > > There are a couple reasons I still use NetworkManager on servers, but one > big one is

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7, nfsdcltrack

Frank Cox wrote: > On Thu, 2 Jun 2016 16:17:28 -0400 > m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > >> nfsdcltrack[39406]: sqlite_insert_client: insert >> statement prepare failed: table clients has 2 columns but 3 values were >> supplied >> >> Anyone got any ideas as to a) why this is happening, and b) what I can

[CentOS] CentOS 7, nfsdcltrack

I'm seeing the following message in my logs: nfsdcltrack[39406]: sqlite_insert_client: insert statement prepare failed: table clients has 2 columns but 3 values were supplied Anyone got any ideas as to a) why this is happening, and b) what I can do about it? mark

[CentOS] FYI: http

I just had to browse to a printer... and with https-use-strict at a server higher up, firefox *would* *not* let me get there. I don't see the circa-2012 printer offering https. Luckily, there was konqueror, which *did* let me go to http:// I just *adore* SmartSoftware that Won't Let You Endanger

Re: [CentOS] Slow RAID Check/high %iowait during check after updgrade from CentOS 6.5 -> CentOS 7.2

Kelly Lesperance wrote: > I did some additional testing - I stopped Kafka on the host, and kicked > off a disk check, and it ran at the expected speed overnight. I started > kafka this morning, and the raid check's speed immediately dropped down to > ~2000K/Sec. > > I then enabled the write-back

Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 and Software Raid Minimal Install

Matt wrote: >>> I am trying to install Centos 7 on a couple 4TB drives with software >>> raid. In the Supermicro bios I set UEFI/BIOS boot mode to legacy. I >>> am using the Centos 7 minimal install ISO flashed to a USB thumb >>> drive. >>> >>> So I do custom drive layout something like this

Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 and Software Raid Minimal Install

Matt wrote: > I am trying to install Centos 7 on a couple 4TB drives with software > raid. In the Supermicro bios I set UEFI/BIOS boot mode to legacy. I > am using the Centos 7 minimal install ISO flashed to a USB thumb > drive. > > So I do custom drive layout something like this using sda and

Re: [CentOS] Kernel panic on 6.8 release with kernel-2.6.32-642.el6.x86_64

Sorin Srbu wrote: >> Behalf Of Johnny Hughes >> Sent: den 26 maj 2016 14:30 >> >> If lockd is failling to start: >> >> https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=10927 > > Uninstalled NFS, as it wasn't needed anyway. > > Still got the panic. > I haven't been following this thread closely, but if it's 7,

Re: [CentOS] Slow RAID Check/high %iowait during check after updgrade from CentOS 6.5 -> CentOS 7.2

Kelly Lesperance wrote: > Already done – they’re not being very helpful, as we don’t have a support > contract, just standard warranty. > Right. We get support for five years, but then we keep things well past that, we don't get rid of them till they're dying. (Don't talk to me about "wasting tax

Re: [CentOS] Slow RAID Check/high %iowait during check after updgrade from CentOS 6.5 -> CentOS 7.2

Kelly Lesperance wrote: > LSI/Avago’s web pages don’t have any downloads for the SAS2308, so I think > I’m out of luck wrt MegaRAID. > > Bounced the node, confirmed MPT Firmware 15.10.09.00-IT. > HP Driver is v 15.10.04.00. > > Both are the latest from HP. > > Unsure why, but the module itself

Re: [CentOS] Slow RAID Check/high %iowait during check after updgrade from CentOS 6.5 -> CentOS 7.2

John R Pierce wrote: > On 5/25/2016 11:44 AM, Kelly Lesperance wrote: >> The HBA is an HP H220. > > OH.its a very good idea to verify the driver is at the same revision > level as the firmware.not 100% sure how you do this under CentOS, my > H220 system is running FreeBSD, and is at

Re: [CentOS] Slow RAID Check/high %iowait during check after updgrade from CentOS 6.5 -> CentOS 7.2

Kelly Lesperance wrote: > I’ve posted this on the forums at > https://www.centos.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=47=57926=244614#p244614 > - posting to the list in the hopes of getting more eyeballs on it. > > We have a cluster of 23 HP DL380p Gen8 hosts running Kafka. Basic specs: > > 2x E5-2650 > 128

Re: [CentOS] Slow RAID Check/high %iowait during check after updgrade from CentOS 6.5 -> CentOS 7.2

Kelly Lesperance wrote: > I’ve posted this on the forums at > https://www.centos.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=47=57926=244614#p244614 > - posting to the list in the hopes of getting more eyeballs on it. > > We have a cluster of 23 HP DL380p Gen8 hosts running Kafka. Basic specs: > > 2x E5-2650 > 128

Re: [CentOS] Hard drives being renamed

Pat Haley wrote: > > We are running Centos 6.7 - 2.6.32-573.22.1.el6.x86_64 on a Quanta > Cirrascale, up to date with patches. We have had a couple of instances > in which the hard drives have become renamed after reboot (e.g. drive > sda is renamed to sdc after reboot). One time this occurred

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7, container question

Mark Haney wrote: > I've been wracking my brain, but for the life of me can't recall the exact > program name, but back when I managed a HPCC, there was a tool that would > let you restrict a running process to X number of CPUs/Cores natively. I > keep thinking it was MPC, but nothing googles on

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7, container question

Frank Cox wrote: > On Mon, 23 May 2016 10:51:57 -0400 > m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > >>We would like to run a container on a server, the reason being the >> COST of a Sybase license (it's by core), and what we can afford is a 4-core >> license. Now, the server's a nice Dell w/ 32 cores, so,

[CentOS] CentOS 7, container question

Hi, folks, We would like to run a container on a server, the reason being the COST of a Sybase license (it's by core), and what we can afford is a 4-core license. Now, the server's a nice Dell w/ 32 cores, so, ideally, what we want to do is set up containers, then, in one container, *only*

Re: [CentOS] CentosPlus

James B. Byrne wrote: > On Wed, May 18, 2016 07:39, Mauricio Tavares wrote: >> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 4:32 AM, James Hogarth >> wrote: >>> On 17 May 2016 20:52, "Mauricio Tavares" >>> wrote: On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 3:04 PM,

Re: [CentOS] one-shot yum command to match rpms between systems?

Frank Cox wrote: > On Wed, 18 May 2016 09:30:54 +0100 > James Hogarth wrote: > >> And of course as will be pointed out by many the only right answer is >> yum >> update anyway given cherry picking updates is not supported. > > The objective is not to cherry pick updates, but rather to install a >

Re: [CentOS] bareos on CentOS 6

Paul Heinlein wrote: > On Tue, 17 May 2016, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > >> I'm hoping *someone* here has worked a bit with bareos. I've tried >> posting to the google groups for it... and haven't even had one person >> view my post >> >> It was working fine, backing up windows boxes for

[CentOS] And another problem: Apache, from CentOS6 to 7, AuthEnv.pm

Has AuthEnv.pm been superseded? Should I be using Env.pm, instead? mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] bareos on CentOS 6

Hi, folks, I'm hoping *someone* here has worked a bit with bareos. I've tried posting to the google groups for it... and haven't even had one person view my post It was working fine, backing up windows boxes for months. Then, about a week ago, the server got a regular yum update, and

Re: [CentOS] ipmitool and CentOS 7

Original Message Subject: ipmitool and CentOS 7 From:m.r...@5-cent.us Date:Mon, May 16, 2016 16:57 To: "CentOS" -- On Dells running

[CentOS] ipmitool and CentOS 7

On Dells running CentOS 6, we could use this command ipmitool delloem lcd set mode userdefined "$(uname -n | sed -e 's/\..*//' )" to set the little LCD screen to display the system name, In the latest sevens, it fails, and gives me usage for the command... which displays exactly that syntax.

Re: [CentOS] Black screen after install / Centos 7.2

Earl A Ramirez wrote: > On 16 May 2016 12:13, "Oliver Zemann" wrote: >> >> Hi, i just installed CentOS 7.2 on my little "server" but i get a black > screen during boot. It is a Asrock Am1h-itx mainboard with an AMD 5350 CPU > (onboard graphic). >> I created a raid 6 but i

[CentOS] httpd config issue on CentOS 7

Migrating a website from CentOS 6 ot 7. I try to fire up apache, and it fails, complaining of a directive: CustomLog logs/internal.oir.cit_ssl_request_log \ "%t %h %{SSL_PROTOCOL}x %{SSL_CIPHER}x \"%r\" %b" I'm googling, but I'd be happy if someone who knows

Re: [CentOS] openssl Security Update for CentOS 6.7 ETA

Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 05/11/2016 11:44 AM, Patrick Rael wrote: >> On 05/11/2016 09:45 AM, Steve Snyder wrote: >>> On Wednesday, May 11, 2016 11:20am, "Patrick Rael" >>> said: Is there an ETA on the openssl security update (CVE-2016-0799) for CentOS 6.7?

Re: [CentOS] openssl Security Update for CentOS 6.7 ETA

Patrick Rael wrote: > On 05/11/2016 09:45 AM, Steve Snyder wrote: >> >> On Wednesday, May 11, 2016 11:20am, "Patrick Rael" >> said: >> >>> Hi, >>> Is there an ETA on the openssl security update (CVE-2016-0799) for >>> CentOS 6.7?I saw the openssl update for CentOS 7 on 5/9,

Re: [CentOS] Upgrade path from CentOS 7 to future versions

Nothing here. I responded to him on this offlist. mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Upgrade path from CentOS 7 to future versions

Warren Young wrote: > On May 10, 2016, at 4:12 PM, Valeri Galtsev > wrote: >> On Tue, May 10, 2016 3:57 pm, Liam O'Toole wrote: >>> On 2016-05-10, Valeri Galtsev >>> wrote: >> Yes, LTS, thanks Liam. Only LTS has life cycle of mere 2

Re: [CentOS] Upgrade path from CentOS 7 to future versions

Alice Wonder wrote: > On 05/10/2016 01:29 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> Alice Wonder wrote: >>> On 05/10/2016 12:19 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 05/10/2016 02:08 AM, Venkateswara Rao Dokku wrote: > > I would like to know whether the valid upgrade path will be present > from CentOS

Re: [CentOS] Upgrade path from CentOS 7 to future versions

Alice Wonder wrote: > On 05/10/2016 12:19 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 05/10/2016 02:08 AM, Venkateswara Rao Dokku wrote: >>> >>> I would like to know whether the valid upgrade path will be present >>> from CentOS 7 to future versions like we get for Ubuntu or some other >>> operating systems.

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 as DNS-Server

Walter H. wrote: > On 10.05.2016 18:57, Александр Кириллов wrote: >>> this seems to be relevant in chroot environments; >>> >>> as I noticed when configuring the DDNS-feature, that this is a little >>> bit weired, when running in a chroot environment; I saw the >>> recommendation not >>> to use a

Re: [CentOS] weird network error

John R Pierce wrote: > a previously rock solid reliable server of mine crashed last night, the > server was still running but eth0, a Intel 82574L using the e1000e > driver, went down. The server has a Supermicro X8DTE-F (dual Xeon > X5650, yada yada).server is a drbd master, so that was the

Re: [CentOS] OT: hardware: MegaCli and initializing a RAID

Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Fri, May 6, 2016 1:36 pm, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> Got a new box I'm trying to set up. I configured the RAID from the >> firmware, but "fast initialize" was sitting there at 0% (it's about 43 >> or 45TB). The first time I tried this, I said background, and >>

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 45.1.0 stability

-- > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > > Nux! > www.nux.ro > > - Original Message - >> From: "m roth" <m.r...@5-cent.us> >> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org> >> Sent: Friday, 6 May, 2016 21:20:

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 45.1.0 stability

Alice Wonder wrote: > On 05/06/2016 11:54 AM, Jeff Layton wrote: >> Good afternoon, >> >> Apologies if this topic has come up before but I've found >> that the Firefox 45.1.0 stability to be somewhat lacking. >> >> For example, I can't use it for Twitter because it crashes. >> It also crashes when

Re: [CentOS] OT: hardware: MegaCli and initializing a RAID

John R Pierce wrote: > On 5/6/2016 11:36 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> Got a new box I'm trying to set up. I configured the RAID from the >> firmware, but "fast initialize" was sitting there at 0% (it's about 43 >> or 45TB). The first time I tried this, I said background, and rebooted >> the

[CentOS] OT: hardware: MegaCli and initializing a RAID

Got a new box I'm trying to set up. I configured the RAID from the firmware, but "fast initialize" was sitting there at 0% (it's about 43 or 45TB). The first time I tried this, I said background, and rebooted the system. And the stupid annoying alarm started up as the system came up. This time,

Re: [CentOS] Reduce existing CentOS 7 installation to "Minimal install" - services?

Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > Le 06/05/2016 13:50, Johnny Hughes a écrit : >> Maybe add a: >> >> yum groupinstall core > > That did add a handful of packages indeed (as was already suggested in > the previous answer), but the problem still persists. > > After rebooting, the system hangs after mounting

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 and 4K display

Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Fri, May 6, 2016 8:28 am, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 05/06/2016 07:12 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: >>> On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 8:06 AM, Jerry Geis >>> wrote: >>> | What is your graphics card model? NVIDIA Corporation GK208 [GeForce GT

Re: [CentOS] yum update (first in a long time) - /var/log/dovecot no longer used

Johnny Hughes wrote: > Right. And I do want to point out, this list is really not the place to > discuss the positives and negatives of systemd vs. upstart vs. SysV. > The goal of CentOS is to build RHEL source code with the absolute > minimum changes required for branding. So, we get the init

Re: [CentOS] yum update (first in a long time) - /var/log/dovecot no longer used

Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Fri, May 6, 2016 3:13 am, Gary Stainburn wrote: >> On Thursday 05 May 2016 17:16:17 Valeri Galtsev wrote: >>> There were several heated discussions on this list, and elsewhere. This >>> is >>> not intended to start the new one, but to help someone who missed them >>>

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >