Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 and systemd: SysV initscript: how detect boot vs. interactive use?

2016-12-28 Thread whitivery
whitivery <co55-s...@dea.spamcon.org> wrote: >Jonathan Billings <billi...@negate.org> >wrote: > >>On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 08:50:54PM -0800, whitivery wrote: >>> It is a system with several servers (various platforms/distros). >>> >>

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 and systemd: SysV initscript: how detect boot vs. interactive use?

2016-12-20 Thread whitivery
Jonathan Billings <billi...@negate.org> wrote: >On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 08:50:54PM -0800, whitivery wrote: >> It is a system with several servers (various platforms/distros). >> >> One piece of software runs on all of the servers. For it to operate >> corr

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 and systemd: SysV initscript: how detect boot vs. interactive use?

2016-12-18 Thread whitivery
James Hogarth <james.hoga...@gmail.com> wrote: >On 18 Dec 2016 10:59, "whitivery" <co55-s...@dea.spamcon.org> wrote: > >Moving from CentOS 5 to CentOS 7, discovered that a test in a SysV >initscript for whether it is running interactively, instead of at boo

[CentOS] CentOS 7 and systemd: SysV initscript: how detect boot vs. interactive use?

2016-12-18 Thread whitivery
Moving from CentOS 5 to CentOS 7, discovered that a test in a SysV initscript for whether it is running interactively, instead of at boot time, no longer works. Under CentOS 7 / systemd, is there some way for the initscript to know this? ___ CentOS

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.7 - occasional lockup

2013-11-18 Thread whitivery
John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote: On 11/16/2013 9:50 PM, whitivery wrote: What else might I try? centos 6.latest ?or at least 5.latest5.7 is circa 2011, there's dozens of kernel patches since then, its up to 5.10 now. Thank you John and John for the replies. I was guessing

[CentOS] CentOS 5.7 - occasional lockup

2013-11-16 Thread whitivery
Using Core i7 boxes with CentOS 5.7, have experienced lockups on half of a handful of units over a couple months. They are Logic Supply Mini-ITX model KR960 with Core i7-3610QE. A couple weeks ago I enabled self-reboot on kernel panic (echo 10 /proc/sys/kernel/panic) on all units, and had

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.7 Ethernet bonding - order of enslavement matters?

2011-10-19 Thread whitivery
Emmanuel Noobadmin centos.ad...@gmail.com wrote: On 10/13/11, whitivery co55-s...@dea.spamcon.org wrote: Eth0 is the onboard device, using an updated VIA Velocity driver (velocityget 1.42 instead of default via-velocity): 05:00.0 Ethernet controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT6120/VT6121/VT6122

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.7 Ethernet bonding - order of enslavement matters?

2011-10-13 Thread whitivery
whitivery co55-s...@dea.spamcon.org wrote: Setting up bonding in active-backup mode 1 (using ARP monitoring) on a server, it looked OK, but pulling the active link cable didn't actually work, it didn't fail over. Eventually with manual playing around with modprobe, ifconfig, ifenslave, etc

[CentOS] CentOS 5.7 Ethernet bonding - order of enslavement matters?

2011-10-08 Thread whitivery
Setting up bonding in active-backup mode 1 (using ARP monitoring) on a server, it looked OK, but pulling the active link cable didn't actually work, it didn't fail over. Eventually with manual playing around with modprobe, ifconfig, ifenslave, etc., a solution was stumbled upon: enslave the eth1

Re: [CentOS] Cannot %include in CentOS 5.5 kickstart

2011-03-18 Thread whitivery
whitivery co55-s...@dea.spamcon.org wrote: whitivery co55-s...@dea.spamcon.org wrote: Patrick Lists centos-l...@puzzled.xs4all.nl wrote: On 03/10/2011 08:14 AM, whitivery wrote: # This does not work %include /tmp/drvdisk # This works #driverdisk --source=nfs:10.0.4.157:/srv/cobbler

Re: [CentOS] Cannot %include in CentOS 5.5 kickstart

2011-03-18 Thread whitivery
whitivery co55-s...@dea.spamcon.org wrote: whitivery co55-s...@dea.spamcon.org wrote: whitivery co55-s...@dea.spamcon.org wrote: Patrick Lists centos-l...@puzzled.xs4all.nl wrote: On 03/10/2011 08:14 AM, whitivery wrote: # This does not work %include /tmp/drvdisk # This works #driverdisk

Re: [CentOS] Cannot %include in CentOS 5.5 kickstart

2011-03-17 Thread whitivery
whitivery co55-s...@dea.spamcon.org wrote: Patrick Lists centos-l...@puzzled.xs4all.nl wrote: On 03/10/2011 08:14 AM, whitivery wrote: # This does not work %include /tmp/drvdisk # This works #driverdisk --source=nfs:10.0.4.157:/srv/cobbler/RHEL5.5_x86_402_409_410_DD.img %packages @base

Re: [CentOS] Cannot %include in CentOS 5.5 kickstart

2011-03-16 Thread whitivery
Patrick Lists centos-l...@puzzled.xs4all.nl wrote: On 03/10/2011 08:14 AM, whitivery wrote: # This does not work %include /tmp/drvdisk # This works #driverdisk --source=nfs:10.0.4.157:/srv/cobbler/RHEL5.5_x86_402_409_410_DD.img %packages @base @core %pre --erroronfail echo

[CentOS] Cannot %include in CentOS 5.5 kickstart

2011-03-10 Thread whitivery
I've previously used includes in CentOS 4.4 and they worked fine. But in CentOS 5.5, trying to specify a driver disk via an include does not work. If I instead specify it directly, it loads fine. When it fails (because it can't see the disk drive - needs the driver disk to see the hard disk),