On Friday, March 25, 2011 03:35:29 pm Les Mikesell wrote:
If 'get there' is defined as all redundant copies being in a consistent
state, then you'll fail at this point in transactional mode in the
fairly likely event that you have a network blip between the db master
and slave(s) or one of
On 3/26/11 12:51 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Friday, March 25, 2011 03:35:29 pm Les Mikesell wrote:
If 'get there' is defined as all redundant copies being in a consistent
state, then you'll fail at this point in transactional mode in the
fairly likely event that you have a network blip between
On 3/24/2011 2:07 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Having said that, I have this troubling thought for last decade: What
exactly is high availability: is it 24/7 power on time? or is ti when
needed. Please not it am not talking about the maybe arrogant on
demand attitude of a human.
Ok, h/a is
On 03/25/11 11:32 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
Not everything deals in transactions, though. The recently popular
distributed database versions that scale up are more about doing
something reasonable in scenarios where you can't guarantee a
transaction state (where 'reasonable' is defined by the
John R Pierce wrote:
On 03/25/11 11:32 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
Not everything deals in transactions, though. The recently popular
distributed database versions that scale up are more about doing
something reasonable in scenarios where you can't guarantee a
transaction state (where
On 3/25/2011 1:57 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
Not everything deals in transactions, though. The recently popular
distributed database versions that scale up are more about doing
something reasonable in scenarios where you can't guarantee a
transaction state (where 'reasonable' is defined by the
On 03/25/11 12:11 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
* Paradigm, as in, the new flavor toothpaste of spearment instead
of peppermint is a New Paradigm!!! and will (dare I say it)
Change the World As We Know It!!
:)
We're still trying to stick forks in Younameit as a Service (YaaS)
On 3/25/2011 2:11 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Not everything deals in transactions, though. The recently popular
distributed database versions that scale up are more about doing
something reasonable in scenarios where you can't guarantee a
transaction state (where 'reasonable' is defined by
Les Mikesell wrote:
On 3/25/2011 2:11 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Not everything deals in transactions, though. The recently popular
distributed database versions that scale up are more about doing
something reasonable in scenarios where you can't guarantee a
transaction state (where
On 03/25/11 12:21 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
So no one develops new applications there?
This is a large scale manufacturing execution system. You don't just go
off and design an all new system based on the buzzwords d'jour, when
your factories are dependent on it.
Picture large factory floors
On 3/25/2011 2:48 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Well... except that in this context, it's not only database
transactions: it's any granular interaction between client and server.
You don't, for example, want part of a form you've just clickedsubmit
on to only partly get there, if there's a
On 3/25/2011 2:59 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
So no one develops new applications there?
This is a large scale manufacturing execution system. You don't just go
off and design an all new system based on the buzzwords d'jour, when
your factories are dependent on it.
Pretty much everyone is in
On 03/25/11 2:43 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
So doesn't that mean you need to start the next design sooner vs later?
If the middleware layer handles most of the component interaction you
might have some freedom to make piecemeal changes. On the other hand,
distributed database technology is still
On 03/25/11 3:37 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 03/25/11 2:43 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
So doesn't that mean you need to start the next design sooner vs later?
If the middleware layer handles most of the component interaction you
might have some freedom to make piecemeal changes. On the other
Greetings,
On 3/24/11, Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com wrote:
I should note, however, that they are not for production use.
Akemi
Thanks Akemi very much for your always relevant and brilliant works.
/rant
As an Indian, where veda repository of knowledge originated, I have
always looked at
On 3/24/2011 2:48 PM, Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote:
I never understood the term Hig Availability : does it mean
available as in soliciting ?
High Availability means that you are pushing toward 100% uptime for
your services. You try to make sure that no one event can take you down.
What
Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote:
On 3/24/11, Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com wrote:
I should note, however, that they are not for production use.
snip
/rant
snip
I am sure you have heard of Hanuman from Ramayana the best grammarian
known?
Huh - it's been more than half a lifetime since I read a
Greetings,
Dear Roth, thanks for you reply. I am your fan club member.
(Hero worshipping is not new to India : Dr. S. Chandrashekhar (Chicago
University), Dr APJ Abdul Kalam, Sachin Tendulkar, Amitabh Bachan,
Rajnikant and the such) in a country of 1/6th earth's population.
But I am still just
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Rajagopal Swaminathan
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2011 14:49
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: [CentOS] {OT] Re: Installing IMA (Integrity Measurement
Architecture) on CentOS 5.5
Greetings,
Thanks for your reply.
On 3/25/11, Denniston, Todd A CIV NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane
todd.dennis...@navy.mil wrote:
So have you and your boss prearranged a level of operational
performance will be met during a contractual measurement period?
Something like: The system will be available
20 matches
Mail list logo
