Re: [CentOS] 5.2 blues

Ned Slider wrote: Dunc wrote: Hi Yes it was written as rpmnew, and indeed the default was the same. But using the original I was using before, changing nothing, with [::] I could not connect after the upgrade. I restarted many times, and eventually changing the original to [*] allowed me

Re: [CentOS] 5.2 blues

Dunc wrote: Ned Slider wrote: Dunc wrote: Hi Yes it was written as rpmnew, and indeed the default was the same. But using the original I was using before, changing nothing, with [::] I could not connect after the upgrade. I restarted many times, and eventually changing the original to [*]

Re: [CentOS] 5.2 blues

Ned Slider wrote: As this seems to affect the default install configuration we presumably need to add a note somewhere to reflect this. Thanks for spotting and reporting it. Has anyone else experienced this or can confirm it? There are some of us, who really use IPv6 in real life :D

RE: [CentOS] 5.2 blues

Karanbir Singh scribbled on Thursday, June 26, 2008 1:31 PM: Ned Slider wrote: As this seems to affect the default install configuration we presumably need to add a note somewhere to reflect this. Thanks for spotting and reporting it. Has anyone else experienced this or can confirm it?

Re: [CentOS] 5.2 blues

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Has anyone else experienced this or can confirm it? There are some of us, who really use IPv6 in real life :D Somebody's actually using IPv6? One comes to think of flying pigs for some reason... ;-) umm. bacon.. - KB

[CentOS] 5.2 blues

Hi all, Am I the only one to have had a totally trouble-free upgrade to 5.2?? I get the feeling that most everybody seems to have *some* problems... -- Best Wishes Sorin - http://home-skynet.servehttp.com/ Proud member of TEAM OS/2.

Re: [CentOS] 5.2 blues

Am Mittwoch, 25. Juni 2008 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Am I the only one to have had a totally trouble-free upgrade to 5.2?? I get the feeling that most everybody seems to have *some* problems... Zero problems here after upgrading a bunch of servers. I guess the majority of users without

Re: [CentOS] 5.2 blues

Ha, until now it looks ok, but i only upgraded yesterday evening... On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 12:29:41 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sorin.srbu Hi all, sorin.srbu sorin.srbu Am I the only one to have had a totally trouble-free upgrade to 5.2?? I get the sorin.srbu feeling that

Re: [CentOS] 5.2 blues

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, Am I the only one to have had a totally trouble-free upgrade to 5.2?? I get the feeling that most everybody seems to have *some* problems... well, how it works is that the millions of machines out there where it just worked, wont get reported, but if things

RE: [CentOS] 5.2 blues

Andreas Micklei scribbled on Wednesday, June 25, 2008 12:37 PM: Thank you CentOS team for the good work! I second that! smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] 5.2 blues

Karanbir Singh wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, Am I the only one to have had a totally trouble-free upgrade to 5.2?? I get the feeling that most everybody seems to have *some* problems... well, how it works is that the millions of machines out there where it just worked, wont get

RE: [CentOS] 5.2 blues

Karanbir Singh scribbled on Wednesday, June 25, 2008 12:51 PM: Am I the only one to have had a totally trouble-free upgrade to 5.2?? I get the feeling that most everybody seems to have *some* problems... well, how it works is that the millions of machines out there where it just worked,

Re: [CentOS] 5.2 blues

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, Am I the only one to have had a totally trouble-free upgrade to 5.2?? I get the feeling that most everybody seems to have *some* problems...

Re: [CentOS] 5.2 blues

Dunc wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, Am I the only one to have had a totally trouble-free upgrade to 5.2?? I get the feeling that most everybody seems to have *some* problems...

Re: [CentOS] 5.2 blues

Hi, On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 12:29 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, Am I the only one to have had a totally trouble-free upgrade to 5.2?? I get the feeling that most everybody seems to have *some* problems... I upgraded 4 machines (all virtual) without any problems from 5.1 to 5.2,

RE: [CentOS] 5.2 blues

On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 13:30 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andreas Micklei scribbled on Wednesday, June 25, 2008 12:37 PM: Thank you CentOS team for the good work! I second that! Me too !! And another donation on its way to CentOS ! :) Regards, Michel

Re: [CentOS] 5.2 blues

Johnny Hughes wrote: If there is something in the conf file that needs to change (that worked in 5.1 and does not in 5.2) let us know and we can add it to the release notes and/or wiki. It was in the listening section as follows: # A space separated list of IP or host addresses where to

Re: [CentOS] 5.2 blues

On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 14:39 +0200, Michel van Deventer wrote: Hi, snip I upgraded 4 machines (all virtual) without any problems from 5.1 to 5.2, tonight I'll upgrade the host machine but I do not expect any problems. I'm only cautious to upgrade my old webserver which is a dual PIII and

Re: [CentOS] 5.2 blues

Dunc wrote: Johnny Hughes wrote: If there is something in the conf file that needs to change (that worked in 5.1 and does not in 5.2) let us know and we can add it to the release notes and/or wiki. It was in the listening section as follows: # A space separated list of IP or host

Re: [CentOS] 5.2 blues

Ned Slider wrote: That's strange Dunc. The new config file was written to /etc/dovecot/conf.rpmnew (as expected) for me, so your modified original doesn't get overwritten. I can see no difference between the 5.1 and 5.2 config files wrt the 'listen' directive. Mine was, and still is, set to

Re: [CentOS] 5.2 blues

Dunc wrote: Hi Yes it was written as rpmnew, and indeed the default was the same. But using the original I was using before, changing nothing, with [::] I could not connect after the upgrade. I restarted many times, and eventually changing the original to [*] allowed me to connect. I then