On 5/17/11, m.r...@5-cent.us m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
If we *really* need a moderator, here's an option: soc.religion.paganism
has a robomoderator; on topic posts get autoapproved, obviously off-topic
get bounced, and if there's any question, they get randomly bounced to a
configurable number
Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
On 5/17/11, m.r...@5-cent.us m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
If we *really* need a moderator, here's an option: soc.religion.paganism
has a robomoderator; on topic posts get autoapproved, obviously
off-topic get bounced, and if there's any question, they get randomly
bounced
On 5/19/11, m.r...@5-cent.us m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
As already said, this sounds really complicated. Coming from an IRC
and vBB admin background, I'll suggest moderation using the reactive
approach instead of a automated process.
Not really. The perl script was written, um, around 1993 or
On 05/17/2011 03:06 AM, John Doe wrote:
Maybe all the non-technical discussions could go into a CentOS
Politics/Philosophy new list...?
And on that note, some required reading for everyone in this floating
flame war. Don't skim it - read it.
http://www.shirky.com/writings/group_enemy.html
--
On Tuesday, May 17, 2011 07:56:59 AM Jerry Franz wrote:
On 05/17/2011 03:06 AM, John Doe wrote:
Maybe all the non-technical discussions could go into a CentOS
Politics/Philosophy new list...?
And on that note, some required reading for everyone in this floating
flame war. Don't skim it -
Lamar Owen wrote:
On Tuesday, May 17, 2011 07:56:59 AM Jerry Franz wrote:
On 05/17/2011 03:06 AM, John Doe wrote:
Maybe all the non-technical discussions could go into a CentOS
Politics/Philosophy new list...?
And on that note, some required reading for everyone in this floating
flame
On Tuesday, May 17, 2011 11:33:37 AM m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
If we *really* need a moderator, here's an option: soc.religion.paganism
has a robomoderator; on topic posts get autoapproved, obviously off-topic
get bounced, and if there's any question, they get randomly bounced to a
configurable
Am 17.05.11 17:33, schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us:
If we *really* need a moderator, here's an option: soc.religion.paganism
has a robomoderator; on topic posts get autoapproved, obviously off-topic
get bounced, and if there's any question, they get randomly bounced to a
configurable number of human
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 12:52:09AM +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Well, too much work for what it is worth. I once helped moderating a
newsgroup and that is a task I at least won't do again. Still hoping for
some common sense :)
+1
9 matches
Mail list logo
