On Feb 22, 2011, at 3:35 PM, Ian Murray murra...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Only joking. I take your point, but the critical fixes being held up for a
dot
release isn't really very Enterprise friendly either. I think it fair to say
that CentOS is not suitable for the enterprise unless the servers
On Feb 22, 2011, at 2:56 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 02/22/2011 02:35 PM, Ian Murray wrote:
I did think about that when when I made my earlier comment. The trouble is
is
that it obviously isn't working because we have these list flame-ups.
I think 8 million unique machines disagree
Corey A Johnson wrote:
John Hinton wrote:
All,
(and please do not turn this into the next long thread)
snip
I am not a man of many words.. and i am usually very quiet on this
list. But would just like to say that i appreciate all the CentOS team
members immensely. I sincerely
I understand how answering everyone's requests for progress updates can
slow a development process, I've been on the development side of that
before. I want a progress report as much as anyone I'm sure (and so
does my boss), but, I'm not going to ask for it. I instead spend a
little time, and
No one is taking you wrong here;
Did you check with everybody before you spoke for them all?
How about the project
renames the distribution to IfYouDontLikeItYouAreNotForcedToUseItOS?
That is a fantastic idea because IMHO it would be a much fairer assessment of
the
How about the project
renames the distribution to
IfYouDontLikeItYouAreNotForcedToUseItOS?
That is a fantastic idea because IMHO it would be a much
fairer assessment of
the distribution than alluding to the Enterprise aspect.
Calling it Enterprise is important because doing
Calling it Enterprise is important because doing so establishes the
*origin* and the *objective* of the work: a BUG-FOR-BUG-IDENTICAL
de-branding/re-branding of Red Hat ENTERPRISE Linux.
How about BugforbugIdenticaldebreandingrebrandingofupstreamenterpriselinuxOS?
Only joking. I take
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 07:54:58PM +, Ian Murray wrote:
No one is taking you wrong here;
Did you check with everybody before you spoke for them all?
Pretty damned sure I made it explicitly clear in a post from
Sunday that I speak only for myself and no one
I really appreciate the availability of CentOS. Thank you to all the people
who work on it and form part of this community!!
Best,
Aleksey
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 02/22/2011 02:35 PM, Ian Murray wrote:
Calling it Enterprise is important because doing so establishes the
*origin* and the *objective* of the work: a BUG-FOR-BUG-IDENTICAL
de-branding/re-branding of Red Hat ENTERPRISE Linux.
How about
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 10:56 PM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
I think 8 million unique machines disagree with you assessment.
With 8 million unique machines running Centos and perhaps millions
people more depending on them comes great responsability.
I hope the Centos crew know what
With 8 million unique machines running Centos and perhaps millions
people more depending on them comes great responsability.
I hope the Centos crew know what they're doing.
Obviously they do, or they would not have come this far.
___
CentOS mailing
I think 8 million unique machines disagree with you assessment. Who
knows, maybe all 8 million are wrong and the 10-20 people who are
discussing it on this list are right.
Man, you could build a killer botnet if you wanted to!! (which strengthens your
argument about the point about the
All,
(and please do not turn this into the next long thread)
We have a small team which volunteers their time to create the CentOS
releases. They are pounded right now with getting that done... it is as
simple as that. Each of us 'chose' to use CentOS and with that choice
comes nothing more.
John Hinton wrote:
All,
(and please do not turn this into the next long thread)
snip
I am not a man of many words.. and i am usually very quiet on this
list. But would just like to say that i appreciate all the CentOS team
members immensely. I sincerely thank you all for the time
John Hinton wrote:
All,
(and please do not turn this into the next long thread)
snip
I am not a man of many words.. and i am usually very quiet on this
list. But would just like to say that i appreciate all the CentOS team
members immensely. I sincerely thank you all for the
On Mon, 2011-02-21 at 13:34 -0500, Corey A Johnson wrote:
I am not a man of many words.. and i am usually very quiet on this
list. But would just like to say that i appreciate all the CentOS team
members immensely. I sincerely thank you all for the time you put in
to what i consider
I am not a man of many words.. and i am usually very quiet on this
list. But would just like to say that i appreciate all the CentOS team
members immensely. I sincerely thank you all for the time you put in
to what i consider the best free Linux distro available.
+1000
On 02/21/2011 01:21 PM, John Hinton wrote:
All,
(and please do not turn this into the next long thread)
We have a small team which volunteers their time to create the CentOS
releases. They are pounded right now with getting that done... it is as
simple as that. Each of us 'chose' to use
2. Add more staff. As a small business owner, the very last thing you
want to do is add more staff when you are in a slammed state. It takes
all of the 'productive' workers time to train the new staff and output
slows to a crawl.
.
On 02/21/2011 04:02 PM, Ian Murray wrote:
another six months and 5.6 another 2 months. Perhaps we have been spoilt by
the
snappiness of the releases in the past. Plus, rename to something that
doesn't
suggest enterprise grade.
You always have the option of paying for a RHEL license if
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011, Ian Murray wrote:
Plus, rename to something that doesn't suggest enterprise grade.
How does the time between upstream release and downstream release have any
effect on whether or not something is considered enterprise grade?
Barry
I too am with the fella's on this. Thanks for all your time and hard work. It
is greatly appreciated, more then words can say.
Aly
--Original Message--
From: Corey A Johnson
Sender: centos-boun...@centos.org
To: CentOS mailing list
ReplyTo: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Air
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 2:21 AM, John Hinton webmas...@ew3d.com wrote:
We have a small team which volunteers their time to create the CentOS
releases. They are pounded right now with getting that done... it is as
simple as that. Each of us 'chose' to use CentOS and with that choice
comes
- Original Message
From: Barry Brimer li...@brimer.org
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Sent: Mon, 21 February, 2011 21:12:57
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Air Conditioning - ON!
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011, Ian Murray wrote:
Plus, rename to something that doesn't suggest
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 12:33:39AM +, Ian Murray wrote:
You get me wrong here. I am not having a go about how long the updates are
taking...(if you think I am, you are not reading my comments properly)...
take
as long as you want... just please don't dress the distribution as
26 matches
Mail list logo
