On Tue, 2014-09-02 at 16:17 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Sorry, typo. I've been a tad busy today... any busier, and I'd feel like a
one-armed paperhanger
The English translation = overloaded :-)
--
Regards,
Paul.
England, EU.
Centos, Exim, Apache, Libre Office.
Linux is the
Always Learning wrote:
On Tue, 2014-09-02 at 16:17 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Sorry, typo. I've been a tad busy today... any busier, and I'd feel like
a
one-armed paperhanger
The English translation = overloaded :-)
Yup. Easier today. And the real problem is that a now-departed
I've had a request to downgrade R on one server, to match three others
(someone who's just left had important scripts, and I assume they break
going a full subrelease...). The server they want downgraded is running
4.1.0-5; the others are running 3.0.1-1. ALL are CentOS 6.5, yet yum
downgrade
On 9/2/2014 11:37 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I've had a request to downgrade R on one server, to match three others
(someone who's just left had important scripts, and I assume they break
going a full subrelease...). The server they want downgraded is running
4.1.0-5; the others are running
On 9/2/2014 12:37, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
The server they want downgraded is running
4.1.0-5;
??
The latest version of R is 3.1.1: http://www.r-project.org/
Do you mean 3.1.0-5?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Warren Young wrote:
On 9/2/2014 12:37, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
The server they want downgraded is running
4.1.0-5;
??
The latest version of R is 3.1.1: http://www.r-project.org/
Do you mean 3.1.0-5?
Sorry, typo. I've been a tad busy today... any busier, and I'd feel like a
one-armed
On 9/2/2014 1:17 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Warren Young wrote:
On 9/2/2014 12:37,m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
The server they want downgraded is running
4.1.0-5;
??
The latest version of R is 3.1.1:http://www.r-project.org/
Do you mean 3.1.0-5?
Sorry, typo. I've been a tad busy today... any
7 matches
Mail list logo
