Em 10-02-2010 00:43, Tom Bishop escreveu:
I just need something for apache auth. I have winbind working just
fine for the other stuff...Thanks
One thing I use is ldaps auth, but it will always demand an auth dialog.
Kerberos ticket support has the advantage than you may avoid that, but
it has
I was able to get ldap auth working fairly easily, although getting SSL to
work took a little bit more effort due to trying to get the ca.cert from the
SBS server
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 2:34 AM, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra r...@1407.orgwrote:
Em 10-02-2010 00:43, Tom Bishop escreveu:
I just
Am Mittwoch, den 10.02.2010, 01:10 +0100 schrieb Jay Leafey:
If you are using AD for JUST authentication and not user information,
you can use the PAM Kerberos stuff. We've been using it for a couple of
years from both CentOS/RHEL 4 and 5 systems with good results. It was
actually pretty
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of JohnS
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 1:31 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Anyone using Active Driectory auth with Centos
5.4.?
On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 14
I looked over an most of which I have already done, the last piece that I am
trying to address is how to do authentication with Apache against active
directory, mod_auth_pam is one way but I have not had any luck getting it to
compile with the latest ApacheThanks
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 6:49
I've had decent luck with LDAP authentication for Apache. AD does not
support anonymous LDAP searches so you have to have a user account that has
the ability to search AD. Here's a modified sample config (.htaccess or
httpd.conf) that includes security group membership checks. This would
require
This looks like the way to go, I don't like the username /pass stored in
plain text but maybe if I create a special group that doesn't really have
any privileges this would work, geez AD is just plain bad...lol, Thanks.
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Pat and Lori Boyer pbo...@gmail.comwrote:
This looks like the way to go, I don't like the username /pass stored in plain
text but maybe if I create a special group that doesn't really have any
privileges this would work, geez AD is just plain bad...lol, Thanks.
I guess you think insecure would be better? If I understand your need, you
Point taken and I do understand, in reality I would rather have nothing to
do with MS which is insecure from the start, ever try to firewall an SBS
2003 install, good luck, they recommend turning it off, go figurelol
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Joseph L. Casale jcas...@activenetwerx.com
On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 18:08 +, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
This looks like the way to go, I don't like the username /pass stored in
plain text but maybe if I create a special group that doesn't really have
any privileges this would work, geez AD is just plain bad...lol, Thanks.
I guess you
seems to me that permitting an anonymous bind to LDAP is inherently more
secure than requiring a user/password combination so I don't think that
your explanation is exactly true.
There are ways to create accounts just for this with reduced privileges.
Research technet...
In Microsoft's view, the
If you are using AD for JUST authentication and not user information,
you can use the PAM Kerberos stuff. We've been using it for a couple of
years from both CentOS/RHEL 4 and 5 systems with good results. It was
actually pretty easy to do (once we figured out which type of chicken
bones to
I just need something for apache auth. I have winbind working just
fine for the other stuff...Thanks
On 2/9/10, Jay Leafey jay.lea...@mindless.com wrote:
If you are using AD for JUST authentication and not user information,
you can use the PAM Kerberos stuff. We've been using it for a couple
On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 21:29 +, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
seems to me that permitting an anonymous bind to LDAP is inherently more
secure than requiring a user/password combination so I don't think that
your explanation is exactly true.
There are ways to create accounts just for this with
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 8:18 AM, Tom Bishop bisho...@gmail.com wrote:
Setting up a new backuppc for a small group of device and I am running
centos 5.4 with winbind setup and working. Everything is working and I
would like the users to authenicate using their AD creds and was wondering
what
On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 14:21 -0700, Craig White wrote:
On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 18:08 +, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
This looks like the way to go, I don't like the username /pass stored in
plain text but maybe if I create a special group that doesn't really have
any privileges this would
Setting up a new backuppc for a small group of device and I am running
centos 5.4 with winbind setup and working. Everything is working and I
would like the users to authenicate using their AD creds and was wondering
what folks are using to do that with apache 2.2 and centos 5.4. I know
about
I had written a blog quite some time back on this. There might be some
glitches in it, but will give you some clue. The blog is
blog.Palalinha.Com
i am sitting at the airport with my mobile so cant find you the
correct thread in the blog. Let me know if it helps.
On 2/8/10, Tom Bishop
18 matches
Mail list logo
