Re: [CentOS] Badlock bad luck again

2016-05-23 Thread Jason Welsh
I just had an issue with automounter not being about to mount windows shares after upgrading all the rpms on some of my centos 6.x servers.. I haven't seen the fix here yet so I thought I'd throw it out there.. as a workaround edit the smb.conf file like so: [global] client use spnego = no

Re: [CentOS] Badlock bad luck

2016-05-11 Thread Mogens Kjaer
On 05/11/2016 11:39 AM, Philippe BOURDEU d'AGUERRE wrote: Workaround with smb.conf parameters given here seems to work but it works only for accounts already existing in the domain. New accounts get a "There are currently no logon servers available to service the logon" message. I have

Re: [CentOS] Badlock bad luck

2016-05-11 Thread Philippe BOURDEU d'AGUERRE
Another follow up. I have a Centos 6 server running as a Samba NT4/PDC Domain controller and have seen the regression with 3.6.23-30 release. Client is a Windows 2008R2 server. Workaround with smb.conf parameters given here seems to work but it works only for accounts already existing in

Re: [CentOS] Badlock bad luck

2016-04-19 Thread Bill Baird
Just to follow up, the fix for us was to add "client ipc signing = auto" to our smb.conf configuration file. On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Bill Baird wrote: > FYI: https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2016-April/199013.html > > On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 12:53 PM,

Re: [CentOS] Badlock bad luck

2016-04-17 Thread Mogens Kjaer
On 04/16/2016 05:54 PM, Bob Smith wrote: client signing = required server signing = auto Thanks, this worked for me, too. Mogens -- Mogens Kjaer, m...@lemo.dk http://www.lemo.dk ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

[CentOS] Badlock bad luck

2016-04-16 Thread Bob Smith
>* Am 13.04.2016 um 07:51 schrieb Mogens Kjaer >: *> >* Hello, *> >* I run a CentOS 6 machine with samba, serving approx. 150 Windows users with samba running as an NT-like PDC. *> >* After today's samba update (samba-3.6.23-30.el6_7.x86_64 etc.),

Re: [CentOS] Badlock bad luck

2016-04-14 Thread Mogens Kjaer
On 04/13/2016 03:10 PM, Steven Ford wrote: Did you update your Windows clients? They run Windows Update automatically. They might not have got the update when the server was updated. Is this the key point? Mogens -- Mogens Kjaer, m...@lemo.dk http://www.lemo.dk

Re: [CentOS] Badlock bad luck

2016-04-14 Thread Mogens Kjaer
On 04/14/2016 12:05 AM, Bob Smith wrote: I had exactly the same problem. Your workaround fixed me too. With the new samba packages my samba\logs are full of errors. If I temporarily disconnected the PC client NIC cable, and logged into the domain using cached credentials, then I could get past

[CentOS] Badlock bad luck

2016-04-13 Thread Bob Smith
I had exactly the same problem. Your workaround fixed me too. With the new samba packages my samba\logs are full of errors. If I temporarily disconnected the PC client NIC cable, and logged into the domain using cached credentials, then I could get past the problem. But, you helped me greatly

Re: [CentOS] Badlock bad luck

2016-04-13 Thread Mark Haney
Slightly OT. A Windows NT4 PDC? Wow. I applaud you, sir! That is a name I've not heard in a long time. On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Bill Baird wrote: > I'm seeing the exact same behavior in my environment (NT4 PDC, not AD). I > had to downgrade samba get

Re: [CentOS] Badlock bad luck

2016-04-13 Thread Bill Baird
FYI: https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2016-April/199013.html On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Bill Baird wrote: > I'm seeing the exact same behavior in my environment (NT4 PDC, not AD). I > had to downgrade samba get systems working again. > > The full error

Re: [CentOS] Badlock bad luck

2016-04-13 Thread Bill Baird
I'm seeing the exact same behavior in my environment (NT4 PDC, not AD). I had to downgrade samba get systems working again. The full error message is: "The trust relationship between this workstation and the primary domain failed". Did you have any luck finding a solution?

Re: [CentOS] Badlock bad luck

2016-04-13 Thread Steven Ford
Did you update your Windows clients? On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 1:51 AM, Mogens Kjaer wrote: > Hello, > > I run a CentOS 6 machine with samba, serving approx. 150 Windows users > with samba running as an NT-like PDC. > > After today's samba update (samba-3.6.23-30.el6_7.x86_64

Re: [CentOS] Badlock bad luck

2016-04-13 Thread Andreas Benzler
yum history undo? Von meinem iPhone gesendet > Am 13.04.2016 um 07:51 schrieb Mogens Kjaer : > > Hello, > > I run a CentOS 6 machine with samba, serving approx. 150 Windows users with > samba running as an NT-like PDC. > > After today's samba update

[CentOS] Badlock bad luck

2016-04-12 Thread Mogens Kjaer
Hello, I run a CentOS 6 machine with samba, serving approx. 150 Windows users with samba running as an NT-like PDC. After today's samba update (samba-3.6.23-30.el6_7.x86_64 etc.), nobody can log in. They all get the "Trust relationship failed" error message. If I downgrade: yum downgrade