On 12/16/2020 12:09 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
On 12/14/20 10:54 AM, Yves Bellefeuille wrote:
The article states that CentOS will now be "upstream" of RHEL instead
of "downstream". This is strange to me. I never thought CentOS was
upstream or downstream of RHEL; I always thought it *was* RHEL --
On 12/14/20 10:54 AM, Yves Bellefeuille wrote:
The article states that CentOS will now be "upstream" of RHEL instead
of "downstream". This is strange to me. I never thought CentOS was
upstream or downstream of RHEL; I always thought it *was* RHEL --
perhaps a little delayed, but that's not
On Dec 16, 2020, at 11:54 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> Even out side the maintenance phase .. there will be some bugs that will
> get incorporated into the next point release. Those should be in Stream
> first.
>
> There will never be another 'downstream rhel source code build' done by
> Red Hat.
On 12/16/20 10:47 AM, James Pearson wrote:
> Johnny Hughes:
>>>
>>> As others have said, it misses the _really_ important bit about the
>>> traditional CentOS model which is to follow the RHEL ~10 year life cycle
>>> It doesn't matter how good/rock solid/whatever CentOS Stream turns out to
>>>
Johnny Hughes:
>>
>> As others have said, it misses the _really_ important bit about the
>> traditional CentOS model which is to follow the RHEL ~10 year life cycle
>> It doesn't matter how good/rock solid/whatever CentOS Stream turns out to
>> be, but if it only has a 5 year life cycle for each
On 12/15/20 6:30 PM, R C wrote:
>
> On 12/15/20 3:04 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>
>> If you want a RHEL clone, that's fine. There will be one available.
>> Someone will make one.
>
> Once IBM owns it? You think? They allowed cloning once .. a long time
> ago.
>
How many people have to tell
On 12/15/20 3:04 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
If you want a RHEL clone, that's fine. There will be one available.
Someone will make one.
Once IBM owns it? You think? They allowed cloning once .. a long time
ago.
___
CentOS mailing list
On 12/15/20 4:11 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 5:04 PM Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 12/14/20 8:25 AM, James Pearson wrote:
Nicolas Kovacs
Here's an interesting read which makes a point for CentOS Stream:
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020, 5:35 PM Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 12/15/20 5:11 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 5:04 PM Johnny Hughes wrote:
> >
> >> On 12/14/20 8:25 AM, James Pearson wrote:
> >>> Nicolas Kovacs
>
> Here's an interesting read which makes a point for
On 12/15/20 5:11 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 5:04 PM Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
>> On 12/14/20 8:25 AM, James Pearson wrote:
>>> Nicolas Kovacs
Here's an interesting read which makes a point for CentOS Stream:
>>
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 5:04 PM Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 12/14/20 8:25 AM, James Pearson wrote:
> > Nicolas Kovacs
> >>
> >> Here's an interesting read which makes a point for CentOS Stream:
> >>
> >>
>
On 12/14/20 8:25 AM, James Pearson wrote:
> Nicolas Kovacs
>>
>> Here's an interesting read which makes a point for CentOS Stream:
>>
>> https://freedomben.medium.com/centos-is-not-dead-please-stop-saying-it-is-at-least-until-you-read-this-4b26b5c44877
>>
>> tl;dr: Communication about Stream was
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 9:41 AM Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
>
> Le 14/12/2020 à 15:25, James Pearson a écrit :
> > As others have said, it misses the _really_ important bit about the
> > traditional CentOS model which is to follow the RHEL ~10 year life cycle
>
> I totally agree with you.
>
> But when
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 8:25 AM James Pearson
wrote:
> I agree that Redhat really screwed up this announcement - they would have
> got a lot more kudos if they had announced CentOS Stream to exist along
> with keeping the current traditional CentOS ...
>
Oh, but they did do that. Last year,
Hi,
> "Nicolas Kovacs" wrote:
>
>>
>> https://freedomben.medium.com/centos-is-not-dead-please-stop-saying-it-is-at-least-until-you-read-this-4b26b5c44877
>
> The article states that CentOS will now be "upstream" of RHEL instead
> of "downstream".
>
> This is strange to me. I never thought
"Nicolas Kovacs" wrote:
>
> https://freedomben.medium.com/centos-is-not-dead-please-stop-saying-it-is-at-least-until-you-read-this-4b26b5c44877
The article states that CentOS will now be "upstream" of RHEL instead
of "downstream".
This is strange to me. I never thought CentOS was upstream or
On 14.12.2020 22:39, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> On 12/14/20 4:09 PM, Konstantin Boyandin via CentOS wrote:
>> On 14.12.2020 21:41, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
>>> Le 14/12/2020 à 15:25, James Pearson a écrit :
As others have said, it misses the _really_ important bit about the
traditional
On 12/14/20 4:09 PM, Konstantin Boyandin via CentOS wrote:
> On 14.12.2020 21:41, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
>> Le 14/12/2020 à 15:25, James Pearson a écrit :
>>> As others have said, it misses the _really_ important bit about the
>>> traditional CentOS model which is to follow the RHEL ~10 year life
On 14.12.2020 21:41, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
> Le 14/12/2020 à 15:25, James Pearson a écrit :
>> As others have said, it misses the _really_ important bit about the
>> traditional CentOS model which is to follow the RHEL ~10 year life cycle
>
> I totally agree with you.
>
> But when you disagree
Le 14/12/2020 à 15:25, James Pearson a écrit :
> As others have said, it misses the _really_ important bit about the
> traditional CentOS model which is to follow the RHEL ~10 year life cycle
I totally agree with you.
But when you disagree with someone (e.g. the CentOS team), it's good at least
Nicolas Kovacs
>
> Here's an interesting read which makes a point for CentOS Stream:
>
> https://freedomben.medium.com/centos-is-not-dead-please-stop-saying-it-is-at-least-until-you-read-this-4b26b5c44877
>
> tl;dr: Communication about Stream was BAD, but Stream itself might be a good
> thing.
Il 2020-12-14 13:07 Nicolas Kovacs ha scritto:
Hi,
Here's an interesting read which makes a point for CentOS Stream:
https://freedomben.medium.com/centos-is-not-dead-please-stop-saying-it-is-at-least-until-you-read-this-4b26b5c44877
tl;dr: Communication about Stream was BAD, but Stream itself
On 14.12.2020 13:07, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
Hi,
Here's an interesting read which makes a point for CentOS Stream:
https://freedomben.medium.com/centos-is-not-dead-please-stop-saying-it-is-at-least-until-you-read-this-4b26b5c44877
tl;dr: Communication about Stream was BAD, but Stream itself
Hi,
Here's an interesting read which makes a point for CentOS Stream:
https://freedomben.medium.com/centos-is-not-dead-please-stop-saying-it-is-at-least-until-you-read-this-4b26b5c44877
tl;dr: Communication about Stream was BAD, but Stream itself might be a good
thing. Here's why.
Cheers,
24 matches
Mail list logo
