Am 08.05.10 17:25, schrieb Axel Thimm:
In a nutshell: ATrpms does try hard to keep CentOS users happy. :)
And thank you for that :)
Cheers,
Ralph
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi,
On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 04:11:15AM +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Am 05.05.10 08:32, schrieb Axel Thimm:
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 03:37:52PM +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
You do not look for updates on 5.4, but for updates on5. And EPEL (as
ATRPMS) tags along with RHEL - so you have to
Am 04.05.10 16:24, schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us:
Ralph wrote:
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 3:40 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I believe I am looking for updates on 5. But, since 5.5 is *not*
released, I should not see bits and pieces that require it. What next,
glibc?
5.5 *is* released. Just not by
Am 04.05.10 17:25, schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us:
That seems reasonable to me. To rephrase, if I'm upgrading a CentOS 5.4
system, and there's no CentOS 5.5, I don't see why yum should find a 5.5
package.
Because there are no 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4, 5.5, 5.x packages for yum.
There is only 5. Which is
Am 05.05.10 08:32, schrieb Axel Thimm:
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 03:37:52PM +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
You do not look for updates on 5.4, but for updates on5. And EPEL (as
ATRPMS) tags along with RHEL - so you have to be looking out for
things like that when you use CentOS.
Until now I
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 03:37:52PM +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 8:38 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I would have to agree with the repo being misconfigured. If I'm on 5.4,
and look for updates to 5.4, it should *not* tell me that one package
needs updating, but that,
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 8:38 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I would have to agree with the repo being misconfigured. If I'm on 5.4,
and look for updates to 5.4, it should *not* tell me that one package
needs updating, but that, and an unnoted dependency, are both actually
5.5.
You do not look
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 8:38 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I would have to agree with the repo being misconfigured. If I'm on 5.4,
and look for updates to 5.4, it should *not* tell me that one package
needs updating, but that, and an unnoted dependency, are both actually
5.5.
You do not look
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 3:40 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I believe I am looking for updates on 5. But, since 5.5 is *not* released,
I should not see bits and pieces that require it. What next, glibc?
5.5 *is* released. Just not by CentOS yet.
Ralph
Ralph wrote:
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 3:40 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I believe I am looking for updates on 5. But, since 5.5 is *not*
released, I should not see bits and pieces that require it. What next,
glibc?
5.5 *is* released. Just not by CentOS yet.
And your point is? I mean, a) we're
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 10:24:25AM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Ralph wrote:
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 3:40 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I believe I am looking for updates on 5. But, since 5.5 is *not*
released, I should not see bits and pieces that require it. What next,
glibc?
5.5
On May 4, 2010, at 10:24 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
And your point is? I mean, a) we're talking about CentOS yum update, and
b) a 5.5 update showing up before 5.5 is released.
mark,
from your post here
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2010-May/093953.html
i infer that the
Steve wrote:
On May 4, 2010, at 10:24 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
And your point is? I mean, a) we're talking about CentOS yum update, and
b) a 5.5 update showing up before 5.5 is released.
from your post here
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2010-May/093953.html
i infer that the
On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 11:25 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
if I'm upgrading a CentOS 5.4
system, and there's no CentOS 5.5, I don't see why yum should find a
5.5
package.
You're missing the point.
epel is a repo intended for RHEL, and by a happy coincidence you can use
their repo for Centos
Yum checkupdate tells me I should update memcached, that the x86_64
1.4.5-1.el5 needs an update, I go to do that, and it complains that it's
missing a dependency of libevent-1.4.so.2 (this is all 64 bit, CentOS
5.4).
Clues... or is this actually broken?
mark
On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 10:07:20AM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Yum checkupdate tells me I should update memcached, that the x86_64
1.4.5-1.el5 needs an update, I go to do that, and it complains that it's
missing a dependency of libevent-1.4.so.2 (this is all 64 bit, CentOS
5.4).
Clues...
Am Montag, den 03.05.2010, 16:07 +0200 schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us:
Yum checkupdate tells me I should update memcached, that the x86_64
1.4.5-1.el5 needs an update, I go to do that, and it complains that it's
missing a dependency of libevent-1.4.so.2 (this is all 64 bit, CentOS
5.4).
Clues...
Chris wrote:
Am Montag, den 03.05.2010, 16:07 +0200 schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us:
Yum checkupdate tells me I should update memcached, that the x86_64
1.4.5-1.el5 needs an update, I go to do that, and it complains that it's
missing a dependency of libevent-1.4.so.2 (this is all 64 bit, CentOS
Am Montag, den 03.05.2010, 16:20 +0200 schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us:
Chris wrote:
Am Montag, den 03.05.2010, 16:07 +0200 schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us:
Yum checkupdate tells me I should update memcached, that the x86_64
1.4.5-1.el5 needs an update, I go to do that, and it complains that it's
Chris wrote:
Am Montag, den 03.05.2010, 16:20 +0200 schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us:
Chris wrote:
Am Montag, den 03.05.2010, 16:07 +0200 schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us:
Yum checkupdate tells me I should update memcached, that the x86_64
1.4.5-1.el5 needs an update, I go to do that, and it complains
Am Montag, den 03.05.2010, 20:38 +0200 schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us:
Chris wrote:
Am Montag, den 03.05.2010, 16:20 +0200 schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us:
Chris wrote:
Am Montag, den 03.05.2010, 16:07 +0200 schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us:
Yum checkupdate tells me I should update memcached, that the
21 matches
Mail list logo
