[CentOS] CentOS 5 (Final): where is Xemacs?

2008-02-01 Thread Kenneth Wolcott
CentOS 5 (Final): where is Xemacs? RH 5 doesn't have Xemacs? Why not? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 (Final): where is Xemacs?

2008-02-01 Thread Warren Young
Kenneth Wolcott wrote: RH 5 doesn't have Xemacs? Why not? Because Linux is a perfectly good operating system already without layering Emacs on top of it. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 (Final): where is Xemacs?

2008-02-01 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Feb 1, 2008 8:11 PM, Kenneth Wolcott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: CentOS 5 (Final): where is Xemacs? RH 5 doesn't have Xemacs? Why not? RH-5 does not have Xemacs because a choice had to me made on using Emacs or Xemacs. Trying to support both was resource intensive and I think fewer people