Hello,
where can i get centos 5.2 64 bit ?
all i can find is 5.5 ...
any help?
_
Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free.
https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus Roland RoLaNd spake:
Hello,
where can i get centos 5.2 64 bit ?
all i can find is 5.5 ...
any help?
http://vault.centos.org/5.2/isos/
HTH,
Timo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with
Hi Roland,
Here is the link for you.
http://iso.linuxquestions.org/centos/centos-5.2/
Regards,
Krishna
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 10:25 PM, Roland RoLaNd r_o_l_a_...@hotmail.comwrote:
Hello,
where can i get centos 5.2 64 bit ?
all i can find is 5.5 ...
any help
Greetings,
I wanted to enable blackhole and CSV engine in the mysql server
so downloaded the SRPM from Centos Site, setup the rpmbuild envronment
with mighty help from the our own Russ's Owlriver website and tried
building it. I have a 5.2 centos box on which I need to enable this so
took the
2010/1/24 Rajagopal Swaminathan raju.rajs...@gmail.com:
Greetings,
I wanted to enable blackhole and CSV engine in the mysql server
so downloaded the SRPM from Centos Site, setup the rpmbuild envronment
with mighty help from the our own Russ's Owlriver website and tried
building it. I have a
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Rajagopal Swaminathan
raju.rajs...@gmail.com wrote:
Greetings,
I wanted to enable blackhole and CSV engine in the mysql server
so downloaded the SRPM from Centos Site, setup the rpmbuild envronment
with mighty help from the our own Russ's Owlriver website and
Hi All
this is really wired ... i searched in all mirrors ( i hope ) ... but i
don't seem to find then availability of cent os 5.2 iso .. ... the thing is
all our perl version depen on Cent os 5.2 ...
Does any one know whyCentod 5.2 is not available !! ...
Thanks !! ...
--
Regards
Agnello
Agnello George wrote:
Hi All
this is really wired ... i searched in all mirrors ( i hope ) ... but
i don't seem to find then availability of cent os 5.2 iso .. ... the
thing is all our perl version depen on Cent os 5.2 ...
Does any one know whyCentod 5.2 is not available !! ...
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 23:31:01 +0530
Agnello George wrote:
this is really wired ... i searched in all mirrors ( i hope ) ... but i
don't seem to find then availability of cent os 5.2 iso .
http://mirror.centos.org/centos-5/5.2/readme
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~
On Mon, 18 May 2009 15:58:26 -0700 jackson byers wrote:
One peculiarity:
I believe I was given the choice of:
--installing the bootloader into mbr
or
--no bootloader install
I did not want my mbr overwritten, so I chose no bootloader
Why is there no choice of 1st sector of root partition?
Julian responded
You need to select 'install bootloader' to the hard disk, and then advanced
options,
where you can tell it to install
it to /boot instead of MBR.
You should have created /boot in the partitioning stage.
I assume you are using some other boot manager
Julian Thomas
I recently used a purchased centos 5.2 dvd to install.
It all went smoothly, and I am up and running
automagically it seems to have upgraded itself to 5.3 Final
One peculiarity:
I believe I was given the choice of:
--installing the bootloader into mbr
or
--no bootloader install
I did not want
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of William L. Maltby
Sent: Monday, May 11, 2009 8:37 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 nVidia GeForce 7300GS resolution problem
The monitor is OK as it's attached via
On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 09:30 +0200, Sorin Srbu wrote:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of William L. Maltby
Sent: Monday, May 11, 2009 8:37 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 nVidia GeForce 7300GS
I have a Gigabyte nVidia GeForce 7300GS on an Intel DG965WHMKR mobo
attached to an LG Flatron LG204WT widescreen monitor. I'm driving the
monitor at 1680*1050, and the picture is compressed into the right-hand
two-thirds of the screen.
The monitor is OK as it's attached via a KVM switch to
On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 19:26 +0100, Dick Holland wrote:
I have a Gigabyte nVidia GeForce 7300GS on an Intel DG965WHMKR mobo
attached to an LG Flatron LG204WT widescreen monitor. I'm driving the
monitor at 1680*1050, and the picture is compressed into the right-hand
two-thirds of the screen.
On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 14:36 -0400, William L. Maltby wrote:
On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 19:26 +0100, Dick Holland wrote:
I have a Gigabyte nVidia GeForce 7300GS on an Intel DG965WHMKR mobo
attached to an LG Flatron LG204WT widescreen monitor. I'm driving the
monitor at 1680*1050, and the picture
On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 21:25 +0100, Dick Holland wrote:
On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 14:36 -0400, William L. Maltby wrote:
On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 19:26 +0100, Dick Holland wrote:
I have a Gigabyte nVidia GeForce 7300GS on an Intel DG965WHMKR mobo
attached to an LG Flatron LG204WT widescreen
JohnS wrote:
KVM Switch? Drop down to init 3. Bring up a shell window to do so.
Reconfigure X. init 3 is runlevel 3.
I had a machine with a nvidia card in it and added in a KVM Switch and
then X would not even boot. Removed the kvm and no problems. So I had to
reconfigure X to work with it.
I recently installed CentOS 5.2 64-bit on a partition on a MacBook Pro 17
inch. It installed just fine, but wired Ethernet is not available. lspci
shows it as nVidia...unknown.
Is it possible to get wired Ethernet running on this laptop under CentOS
without having to create a virtual machine
Scott R. Ehrlich wrote:
Is it possible to get wired Ethernet running on this laptop under CentOS
without having to create a virtual machine installation of CentOS?
If so, what is the magic?
if you send me the device, I will have a go at making it all justwork :)
--
Karanbir Singh :
FM wrote:
Hello,
I will create a Xen cluster and using GFS2 (with conga, ...) to create
a new Xen cluster.
I know that GFS2 is prod ready since RHEL 5.3.
Do you know whent Centos 5.3 will be ready ?
Can I install my GFS2 FS with centos 5.2 and then simply upgrade to
5.3 without
Fabian Arrotin wrote:
FM wrote:
Do you know whent Centos 5.3 will be ready ?
Can I install my GFS2 FS with centos 5.2 and then simply upgrade to
5.3 without reinstallation ?
No, you'll have manual intervention because now in 5.3 gfs2 module is
included by default in the 2.6.18-128.el5
Could you please provide a description of the components in the system
you are trying to boot it in?
Do you have at least 256-512 MB of RAM?
Hi,
The CD/DVD image was downloaded from mirrors.gigenet:
http://mirrors.gigenet.com/centos/5/isos/i386/CentOS-5.2-i386-LiveCD.iso
The system is an
tblader wrote:
The system is an Asus m2n-e mainboard, amd x2 6400, 8 gig of ram.
It's got and LSI 8704 ELP raid card, a couple of realtek gig nics
and SATA dvd drive.
My home desktop machine is an M2N-E Mobo, and works fine with the LiveCD.
[r...@chamkaur ~]# dmidecode | grep -i m2n-e
I have 2Gbs DDR 2 Ram and swap part of appro 1957 Mbs as I feel i
should have Swap Partition of 4 Gbs for a 2 Gbs Ram yes I am hosting
about 12 sites and domains
on Name-based Virtual Hosts, I got it I have to add some more Gbs of Ram.
one more thing on this system there are lost of cron jobs
Michael Peterson wrote on Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:44:43 -0500:
What do you mean by this?
Is this because you changed the original post and you thought I was
replying to the other part of the original post.
Sorry? I did not change anything. You replied to *my* posting with
questions to the
Hello to all,
I am having a web server mail server Mysql and name server
on single machine my os is CentOs 5.2 and desktop
gnome everything was working fine now couple of days
back I was using text editor, Fire Fox and GIMP at a time
and my mouse started to act funny as well as very slow
even my
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Tariq Ismail Dalvi tariqda...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello to all,
I am having a web server mail server Mysql and name server
on single machine my os is CentOs 5.2 and desktop
gnome everything was working fine now couple of days
back I was using text editor, Fire
Hello All
Anyone have a workaround for booting the 5.2 LiveCD?
I'm getting this error:
no root yet, udev rule will write symlink
Then I drop to a shell, with a message to create a symlink
to /dev/root and then exit the shell. There is also a message
that it cannot find the root filesystem.
Tblader wrote on Tue, 10 Mar 2009 08:50:48 -0500:
Anyone have a workaround for booting the 5.2 LiveCD?
I'm getting this error:
no root yet, udev rule will write symlink
Then I drop to a shell, with a message to create a symlink
to /dev/root and then exit the shell.
And that is
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Tblader wrote on Tue, 10 Mar 2009 08:50:48 -0500:
Anyone have a workaround for booting the 5.2 LiveCD?
I'm getting this error:
no root yet, udev rule will write symlink
Then I drop to a shell, with a message to create a symlink
to /dev/root and then exit the
Michael, next time, could you please reply to the original post instead of
hooking in to others?
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Good Day!
We have some troubles with installation of CentOS 5.0 on Supermicro server with
Adaptec AIC-9410 SAS Controller, but installation complete successfully on
CentOS 4.5.
This issue has been solved in version 5.2? Or it will be solved in version 5.3?
Sorry for my English ;(
--
wbr -
on 3-4-2009 6:49 AM Maxim Odinintsev spake the following:
Good Day!
We have some troubles with installation of CentOS 5.0 on Supermicro server
with Adaptec AIC-9410 SAS Controller, but installation complete successfully
on CentOS 4.5.
This issue has been solved in version 5.2? Or it will
Scott Silva wrote:
Why not try it with 5.2 and see if it works. It shouldn't take that long.
Hello
Because, first production server now work under CentOS 4.5 and don't need to
reinstall.
Now we want to buy some new servers, and want to now, before they bayed, which
OS
install on its, without
on 3-4-2009 8:25 AM Maxim Odinintsev spake the following:
Scott Silva wrote:
Why not try it with 5.2 and see if it works. It shouldn't take that long.
Hello
Because, first production server now work under CentOS 4.5 and don't need to
reinstall.
Now we want to buy some new servers, and
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Maxim Odinintsev gwynn@gmail.com wrote:
Scott Silva wrote:
Why not try it with 5.2 and see if it works. It shouldn't take that long.
Hello
Because, first production server now work under CentOS 4.5 and don't need to
reinstall.
Now we want to buy some
Craig White wrote on Fri, 27 Feb 2009 07:46:47 -0700:
you can get clam* and newer spamassassin rpms from rpmforge
I suggest rolling your own SA. It's as simple as downloading the tarball
and rebuilding it with the included spec file. It's a simple one-line
command and documented on the
Craig White wrote on Fri, 27 Feb 2009 07:46:47 -0700:
you can get clam* and newer spamassassin rpms from rpmforge
I suggest rolling your own SA. It's as simple as downloading the tarball
and rebuilding it with the included spec file. It's a simple one-line
command and documented on
Guys,
What repo has rpms for mailscanner, clamav and spamassasin?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Linux Advocate wrote:
What repo has rpms for mailscanner, clamav and spamassasin?
I don't know a repository with mailscanner, clamav and spamassassin are
in rpmforge.
Cheers,
Ralph
pgpchZkedcZge.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing
On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 06:32 -0800, Linux Advocate wrote:
Guys,
What repo has rpms for mailscanner, clamav and spamassasin?
you can get clam* and newer spamassassin rpms from rpmforge
mailscanner afaik, only from mailscanner.info
Craig
___
Linux Advocate wrote:
Guys,
What repo has rpms for mailscanner, clamav and spamassasin?
RPMforge has clamav and spamassassin, but not mailscanner.
Mailscanner has RPMs available on their site.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Linux Advocate wrote:
Guys,
What repo has rpms for mailscanner, clamav and spamassasin?
There is a subscription based repo available from FSL:
http://www.fsl.com/index.php/barricademx/mailscanner-repository
D
___
CentOS mailing list
Guys, acording to the quickinstall.txt guide on the mailscanner site, there is
an install.sh file which installs the mailscanner rpm, all the other perl rpms.
Additionally, the site has also clam av and spamassassin installers too?
any experience on these things? could just forego the rpms
Linux Advocate wrote:
Guys, acording to the quickinstall.txt guide on the mailscanner site, there
is an install.sh file which installs the mailscanner rpm, all the other perl
rpms. Additionally, the site has also clam av and spamassassin installers too?
any experience on these things?
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:57, Julio Rodanes - KNET ju...@knet.es wrote:
I have read that the AHCI module allows hotplug but when I add a hot new
SATA disk, the system don't detects it .
Any idea of what the problem is?
Even though it's hotplug, you have to give Linux a command so that
Hello, I have a server Supermicro 5015B-MT with ICH9R chipset, disk SATAII and
Centos 5.2
I have read that the AHCI module allows hotplug but when I add a hot new SATA
disk, the system don't detects it .
Any idea of what the problem is?
Thanks.
Julio Rodan?s Martinez
SISTEMAS DE
2009/2/18 Julio Rodanes - KNET ju...@knet.es:
Hello, I have a server Supermicro 5015B-MT with ICH9R chipset, disk SATAII
and Centos 5.2
I have read that the AHCI module allows hotplug but when I add a hot new
SATA disk, the system don't detects it .
Any idea of what the problem is?
Is
/politica_privacidad.htm
De: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] En nombre de
Laurent Wandrebeck
Enviado el: miércoles, 18 de febrero de 2009 17:29
Para: CentOS mailing list
Asunto: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 and SATA HotSwap
2009/2/18 Julio Rodanes - KNET ju...@knet.es:
Hello
I am encountering an odd problem with su. Up until quite recently I was
able to connect to one of my servers (CentOS-5.2) via ssh as an ordinary
user and then, from the shell, perform an $ su -l to obtain root access.
Now when I try to do this I see the following:
$ su -l
Password:
su:
James B. Byrne wrote:
Any ideas as to what might be happening here and how I might fix it?
It's a long shot but check that /bin/su is setuid ?
From a 5.1 system:
-rwsr-xr-x 1 root root 24060 Mar 21 2007 /bin/su
nate
___
CentOS mailing list
On Wed Jan 14 17:16:01 UTC 2009, nate centos at linuxpowered.net wrote:
It's a long shot but check that /bin/su is setuid ?
From a 5.1 system:
-rwsr-xr-x 1 root root 24060 Mar 21 2007 /bin/su
This is what I have on that host:
# ll /bin/su
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 24120 May 24 2008
I noticed that the suid mode was missing and set it with chmod u+s
/usr/bin/su. Now the permissions are:
$ ll $(which su)
-rwsr-xr-x 1 root root 24120 May 24 2008 /bin/su
And now su -l works for ordinary users. Thank you very much.
I am certain that I have not been changing file modes in
James B. Byrne wrote:
I noticed that the suid mode was missing and set it with chmod u+s
/usr/bin/su. Now the permissions are:
$ ll $(which su)
-rwsr-xr-x 1 root root 24120 May 24 2008 /bin/su
And now su -l works for ordinary users. Thank you very much.
I am certain that I have not
James B. Byrne wrote on Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:11:52 -0500 (EST):
Does anyone have any idea how this change could occur?
There are some security tools that could be configured to reset SUID bits
on files in certain paths with their default templates.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get
On Saturday 13 December 2008 03:32:20 am Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Dave Stevens wrote on Fri, 12 Dec 2008 13:32:51 -0800:
#baseurl=http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/5/$basearch
mirrorlist=http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/mirrorlist?repo=epel-5arch=$
basearch
Hm, not hardcoded then. I
Dave Stevens wrote on Fri, 12 Dec 2008 13:32:51 -0800:
#baseurl=http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/5/$basearch
mirrorlist=http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/mirrorlist?repo=epel-5arch=$basearch
Hm, not hardcoded then. I looked again at ftp://ftp.muug.mb.ca/mirror/
The epel mirror is to
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 18:28, Art Age Software artag...@gmail.com wrote:
IPTABLES -A INPUT -i bond0 -p tcp -m tcp -s 192.168.1.0/24 -d
192.168.1.0/24 --dport 11211 -m state --state NEW -j ACCEPT
s1 kernel: DROP -- Catch All: IN=bond0 OUT= SRC=192.168.1.2
DST=192.168.1.1 LEN=52
Hello
I am running CentOS 5.2 in VMWare 6.5. Firefox doesn't run but Konqurer
does.
VMware host (Vista) is connected to the internet via a DSL router.
CentOS VMware network is brided, DHCP is activated, no firewall is acive.
Perhaps somebody can help me.
Thank you in advance
Josef
I do have such a rule at the top of the rule set. Sorry I did not
provide more context. The basic structure of my rule set is:
1. Deny some known bad packet types.
2. Accept ESTABLISHED, RELATED traffic.
3. Accept rules of various sorts (such as the memcached rules).
4. Deny all (catch all rule).
Josef Temminghoff wrote on Sat, 13 Dec 2008 18:47:41 +0100:
I am running CentOS 5.2 in VMWare 6.5. Firefox doesn't run but Konqurer
does.
Does it jump or what? One might assume from the rest that you want to say
you can't make it display websites or so, but this is just a guess.
Provide
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 6:31 PM, Kai Schaetzl mailli...@conactive.com wrote:
Josef Temminghoff wrote on Sat, 13 Dec 2008 18:47:41 +0100:
I am running CentOS 5.2 in VMWare 6.5. Firefox doesn't run but Konqurer
does.
Does it jump or what? One might assume from the rest that you want to say
A couple of days ago I run yum update to take care of installing new updates
for evolution.i386, evolution-data-server.i386 and nscd.i386 . The update
went through with no fuss. Yesterday when I ran check-update I got the exact
same updates list. So I did not run yum update, thinking this was a
Dave Stevens wrote on Fri, 12 Dec 2008 11:22:46 -0800:
Anyone know why this happens or what to do? I see the epel mirror has changed
No, the mirror for base changed.
Error: Cannot retrieve repository metadata (repomd.xml) for repository: epel.
It doesn't appear to mirror EPEL:
Hi,
I'm experiencing the most perplexing problem with iptables on CentOS
5.2. I'm hoping someone can point out what I must be missing here.
I have memcached set up on several nodes on an internal network. I
have the following rules set up to allow traffic between memcached
nodes:
IPTABLES -A
On Friday 12 December 2008 12:31:47 pm Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Dave Stevens wrote on Fri, 12 Dec 2008 11:22:46 -0800:
Anyone know why this happens or what to do? I see the epel mirror has
changed
No, the mirror for base changed.
Error: Cannot retrieve repository metadata (repomd.xml) for
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 15:45, Art Age Software artag...@gmail.com wrote:
IPTABLES -A XXX -i bond0 -p tcp -m tcp -s 192.168.1.0/24 -d
192.168.1.0/24 --dport 11211 -j ACCEPT
Dec 12 20:33:53 s1 kernel: DROP -- Catch All: IN= OUT=bond0
SRC=192.168.1.1 DST=192.168.1.2 LEN=40 TOS=0x00
Thanks for your reply. I originally had stateful rules in place and
packets were being dropped. I had just switched to stateless rules in
an attempt to fix the problem.
I will go back to stateful and update this thread with the new log messages.
Thanks.
Sam
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 2:33 PM,
OK, here are the original (stateful) rules reinstated:
IPTABLES -A INPUT -i bond0 -p tcp -m tcp -s 192.168.1.0/24 -d
192.168.1.0/24 --dport 11211 -m state --state NEW -j ACCEPT
IPTABLES -A FORWARD -i bond0 -p tcp -m tcp -s 192.168.1.0/24 -d
192.168.1.0/24 --dport 11211 -m state --state
CentOS 5.2 and 4.7 work for me at the latest
VMWare Workstation, Server and ESX :-)
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Les Mikesell
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 9:45 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2 on Vmware Server: Disk space
not preallocated - no disk found by installer
Sven wrote
Sven wrote:
Hi folks
I am trying to install CentOS 5.2 in Vmware Server environment. In my
VM disk space is not preallocated for the virtual disk (dynamically).
The installer doesn't find the disk. When preallocating 6 GB there is
no problem.
See screenshot[0]
Any ideas?
I can't
Les Mikesell wrote:
I can't see anything to indicate why it doesn't show the disk, but I've
used dynamic disks for installation before.
I exclusively use dynamic allocation and it works for me with CentOS 5.2
as a guest.
Host is Ubuntu 8.10
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
nate wrote:
Hi, I'm trying a fresh install on a x86_64 (Supermicro X7dbe, 2xIntel
Xeon X5450, 8 GB, 3WARE 9650SE-8LPML, 3 disks in RAID 5).
The format takes quite long (2,7 TB), that seems to be normal, but then
the first boot will not take place, instead the system loops. Any hints?
Try
Hi,
Michael Kress wrote:
Try again using a volume that is less than 2TB in size and see
if it makes a difference?
Just found in the 3ware manual:
Even though the Linux 2.6 kernel supports partitions larger than 2 TB,
the installers for SuSE and Redhat do not. Turn auto-carving on to
Michael Kress さんは書きました:
nate wrote:
Hi, I'm trying a fresh install on a x86_64 (Supermicro X7dbe, 2xIntel
Xeon X5450, 8 GB, 3WARE 9650SE-8LPML, 3 disks in RAID 5).
The format takes quite long (2,7 TB), that seems to be normal, but then
the first boot will not take place, instead the system
if use CentOS 5.0 try this way.
1.make 20GB partition at 3ware.
2.make 2680GB partition at 3ware.
3.install CentOS 5.2 on 20GB partition, ignore 2680GB partition.
sorry
3.install CentOS 5.0 on 20GB partition, ignore 2680GB partition.
tonoki
___
Hi, I'm trying a fresh install on a x86_64 (Supermicro X7dbe, 2xIntel
Xeon X5450, 8 GB, 3WARE 9650SE-8LPML, 3 disks in RAID 5).
The format takes quite long (2,7 TB), that seems to be normal, but then
the first boot will not take place, instead the system loops. Any hints?
The message follows:
nate wrote:
Michael Kress wrote:
Hi, I'm trying a fresh install on a x86_64 (Supermicro X7dbe, 2xIntel
Xeon X5450, 8 GB, 3WARE 9650SE-8LPML, 3 disks in RAID 5).
The format takes quite long (2,7 TB), that seems to be normal, but then
the first boot will not take place, instead the system
Michael Kress wrote:
Hi, I'm trying a fresh install on a x86_64 (Supermicro X7dbe, 2xIntel
Xeon X5450, 8 GB, 3WARE 9650SE-8LPML, 3 disks in RAID 5).
The format takes quite long (2,7 TB), that seems to be normal, but then
the first boot will not take place, instead the system loops. Any hints?
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 9:43 PM, Miguel Medalha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's a real raid adapter and the linux kernel is able to handle it with
the standard ips module
I found some references in Google that seemed to indicate a fakeraid
controller, one that depends on the driver to do the
Fabian Arrotin wrote:
If you use the hw raid, you can easily manager your raid array with
either ipssend cli or ServeRAID manager gui (both are downloadable from
IBM support website)
Faultdetection sucks with that, but you can use ipmitool for that:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ipmitool sdr|grep
I've installed RHEL 4 on several IBM eSeries servers with ServeRaid
controllers and I despise them. They fail too often and often don't
tell you that they are having problems until it is too late. My
suggestion is to use Linux software for your RAID array, and bypass the
ServeRaid controller
I've installed RHEL 4 on several IBM eSeries servers with ServeRaid
controllers and I despise them. They fail too often and often don't
tell you that they are having problems until it is too late.
Are you referring to the SATA controllers or to the SCSI ones?
I need to install CentOS 5.2 on a IBM Server xSeries 226, which comes
with a IBM SERVERAID 6i RAID card. I think it is not a true hardware
RAID card. I has, nevertheless, an interesting feature: 128MB of cache
with battery backup.
I launched the CentOS boot DVD and CentOS correctly
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My question now is: what would be the better way to implement RAID 5 on this
server? Should I use the detected array and respective driver or should I
delete the array and go for Linus Software RAID?
I don't know about throughput, but using
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know that Linux RAID will create a universal, more compatible array,
readable on any Linux machine. But is there some other reason that
makes it preferrable to use the SERVERAID driver provided by CentOS?
Is it optimized in any way that recommends its use?
I always
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to install CentOS 5.2 on a IBM Server xSeries 226, which comes
with a IBM SERVERAID 6i RAID card. I think it is not a true hardware
RAID card. I has, nevertheless, an interesting feature: 128MB of cache
with battery backup.
I launched the CentOS boot DVD and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to install CentOS 5.2 on a IBM Server xSeries 226, which comes
with a IBM SERVERAID 6i RAID card. I think it is not a true hardware
RAID card. I has, nevertheless, an interesting feature: 128MB of cache
with battery backup.
It's a real raid adapter and the
It's a real raid adapter and the linux kernel is able to handle it
with the standard ips module
I found some references in Google that seemed to indicate a fakeraid
controller, one that depends on the driver to do the RAID calculations...
It's always up to you to decide but i'd prefer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My question now is: what would be the better way to implement RAID 5
on this server? Should I use the detected array and respective driver
or should I delete the array and go for Linus Software RAID?
I've installed RHEL 4 on several IBM eSeries servers with ServeRaid
Hi all...
First of all, I'm new to this list. Thanks in advance for the help I
surely
will get here ;)
I have installed a CentOS 5.2 64 bit on a computer, and I can't get it
to
boot.
The box is a custom built computer, with this components:
- ASUS P5N64 WS Pro motherboard (nForce 790i
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 10:04 AM, J.A. Magallón [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Hi all...
First of all, I'm new to this list. Thanks in advance for the help I surely
will get here ;)
I have installed a CentOS 5.2 64 bit on a computer, and I can't get it to
boot.
The box is a custom built
Hi, guys!
I'm trying to use php-mssql and I've tested the same php program on
two servers (CEntOS-5 and Debian).
CEntOS-5.2 (final)
- php 5.1.6-20
- php-mssql 5.1.6-15 (from extras repository).
- freetds 0.64-11
--- php test code
?php
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 21:26, Jun Salen wrote:
Between Bacula and Backuppc, based on list users experience, which is better
to use? I intend
to backup both Windows and Linux server. Can I use this to backup my linux
mail server with
Zimbra services shutdown? Can I use this to backup
On Wed, 5 Nov 2008, Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
IMHO, if you still use tapes, forget the past and move to the future
of disk-based backups, and adopt Backuppc as your tool.
There are trade-offs here. Tapes are generally regarded as having a
longer shelf life than disks, and they're less
Paul Heinlein wrote:
On Wed, 5 Nov 2008, Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
IMHO, if you still use tapes, forget the past and move to the future
of disk-based backups, and adopt Backuppc as your tool.
There are trade-offs here. Tapes are generally regarded as having a
longer shelf life than disks,
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 12:13, Paul Heinlein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMHO, if you still use tapes, forget the past and move to the future of
disk-based backups, and adopt Backuppc as your tool.
There are trade-offs here. Tapes are generally regarded as having a longer
shelf life than
1 - 100 of 281 matches
Mail list logo
