I blame Adaptec for the dominance of IDE. Seriously.
If Adaptec A) hadn't had the lionshare of the SCSI mindset in the PC
business back in the 90s, and B) hadn't made so much overpriced buggy
crap, we'd all be using SCSI today.
Yes and No. I remember playing with it back in the 90's and
On Tue, 8 Mar 2011, Drew wrote:
I blame Adaptec for the dominance of IDE. Seriously.
If Adaptec A) hadn't had the lionshare of the SCSI mindset in the
PC business back in the 90s, and B) hadn't made so much overpriced
buggy crap, we'd all be using SCSI today.
Yes and No. I remember
Drew wrote:
I blame Adaptec for the dominance of IDE. Â Seriously.
If Adaptec A) hadn't had the lionshare of the SCSI mindset in the PC
business back in the 90s, and B) hadn't made so much overpriced buggy
crap, we'd all be using SCSI today.
Yes and No. I remember playing with it back in
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 10:07 PM, Charles Polisher cpol...@surewest.net wrote:
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Fakeraid#Firmware.2Fdriver-based_RAID
covers fake RAID.
Ouch. That was *precisely* why I used the 2410, not the 1420, SATA
card, some years back. It was nominally more
On 03/07/2011 09:00 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 10:07 PM, Charles Polishercpol...@surewest.net
wrote:
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Fakeraid#Firmware.2Fdriver-based_RAID
covers fake RAID.
Ouch. That was*precisely* why I used the 2410, not
On 03/07/11 10:43 AM, Chuck Munro wrote:
I haven't used Adaptec cards for
many years, mostly because their SCSI controllers back in the early days
were junk.
I blame Adaptec for the dominance of IDE. Seriously.
If Adaptec A) hadn't had the lionshare of the SCSI mindset in the PC
business
My scepticism regarding SMART data continues ... the flaky drive
showed no errors, and a full test and full zero-write using the WD
diagnostics revealed no errors either. If the drive is bad, there's
no evidence that would cause WD to issue an RMA.
I've been having a rash of drive failures
On 03/06/2011 09:00 AM, compdoc wrote:
Regarding the Marvell drivers, I had good luck with the 'sata_mv' driver
in Scientific Linux 6 just yesterday, running a pair of 4-port PCIe-x4
Tempo 'Sonnet' controller cards.
Are those the Mac/Windows Sonnet cards that go for less than $200?
What
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Chuck Munro chu...@seafoam.net wrote:
On 03/06/2011 09:00 AM, compdoc wrote:
Regarding the Marvell drivers, I had good luck with the 'sata_mv' driver
in Scientific Linux 6 just yesterday, running a pair of 4-port PCIe-x4
Tempo 'Sonnet' controller cards.
Are
Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
I like Adaptec for price/performance, and good Linux overall
compatibility (including CentOS). Just don't order those fell off the
truck Taiwan specials that are clearly Adaptec chipsets, but have
actually had the numbers filed off.
Adaptec is proud of their
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 4:16 PM, compdoc comp...@hotrodpc.com wrote:
If the Marvell drivers don't pan out, it looks like I'll have
to either spend money on a 3Ware|LSI|Promise controller
The 3ware are excellent...
And Promise, historically, is *not*.
areca works..
eero
On 5 Mar 2011 16:36, Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 4:16 PM, compdoc comp...@hotrodpc.com wrote:
If the Marvell drivers don't pan out, it looks like I'll have
to either spend money on a 3Ware|LSI|Promise controller
The 3ware are excellent...
On 03/05/2011 09:00 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 4:16 PM, compdoccomp...@hotrodpc.com wrote:
If the Marvell drivers don't pan out, it looks like I'll have
to either spend money on a 3Ware|LSI|Promise controller
The 3ware are excellent...
And Promise,
Regarding the Marvell drivers, I had good luck with the 'sata_mv' driver
in Scientific Linux 6 just yesterday, running a pair of 4-port PCIe-x4
Tempo 'Sonnet' controller cards.
Are those the Mac/Windows Sonnet cards that go for less than $200?
What kind of performance you seeing? Are you doing
On 03/05/11 7:01 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
areca works..
for SAS, I prefer LSI Logic.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 03/04/2011 09:00 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 3/3/11 6:52 PM, Chuck Munro wrote:
I've been on a real roller coaster ride getting a large virtual host up
and running. One troublesome thing I've discovered (the hard way) is
that the drivers for Marvell SAS/SATA chips still have a
If the Marvell drivers don't pan out, it looks like I'll have
to either spend money on a 3Ware|LSI|Promise controller
The 3ware are excellent...
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hello all,
I've been on a real roller coaster ride getting a large virtual host up
and running. One troublesome thing I've discovered (the hard way) is
that the drivers for Marvell SAS/SATA chips still have a few problems.
After Googling around quite a bit, I see a significant number of
On 3/3/11 6:52 PM, Chuck Munro wrote:
I've been on a real roller coaster ride getting a large virtual host up
and running. One troublesome thing I've discovered (the hard way) is
that the drivers for Marvell SAS/SATA chips still have a few problems.
After Googling around quite a bit, I see
19 matches
Mail list logo
