Brian T Brunner wrote:.
[Snipped]
In .vimrc
:set sw=4
:set ai
In .bashrc
alias diff='diff -bw'
Personally I like:
alias diff='diff -bBiw'
YMMV
Toodles,
Roy
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
--On Wednesday, June 15, 2011 02:52:22 PM -0700 Keith Keller
kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us wrote:
I am constantly frustrated by being limited to a whole number of spaces.
What if I want pi spaces? Or e*i?
I would like to introduce other space operators as well. For example,
we could use
Devin Reade wrote:
--On Wednesday, June 15, 2011 02:52:22 PM -0700 Keith Keller
kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us wrote:
I am constantly frustrated by being limited to a whole number of spaces.
What if I want pi spaces? Or e*i?
I would like to introduce other space operators as well. For
--On Friday, June 17, 2011 02:27:22 PM -0400 m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Minkowski space?
Sure. I'll implement M-x minkowski-space-mode as soon as I
get 'elsewhere' (in Minkowski terms, that is).
Devin
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Devin Reade wrote:
--On Friday, June 17, 2011 02:27:22 PM -0400 m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Minkowski space?
Sure. I'll implement M-x minkowski-space-mode as soon as I
get 'elsewhere' (in Minkowski terms, that is).
You're sure that's not a vim option?
mark
Kirk: Warp 5, Scotty!
On 6/17/2011 2:02 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Devin Reade wrote:
--On Friday, June 17, 2011 02:27:22 PM -0400 m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Minkowski space?
Sure. I'll implement M-x minkowski-space-mode as soon as I
get 'elsewhere' (in Minkowski terms, that is).
You're sure that's not a vim
Les Mikesell wrote:
On 6/17/2011 2:02 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Devin Reade wrote:
--On Friday, June 17, 2011 02:27:22 PM -0400 m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Minkowski space?
Sure. I'll implement M-x minkowski-space-mode as soon as I
get 'elsewhere' (in Minkowski terms, that is).
You're
On 6/17/2011 2:36 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
On 6/17/2011 2:02 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Devin Reade wrote:
--On Friday, June 17, 2011 02:27:22 PM -0400 m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Minkowski space?
Sure. I'll implement M-x minkowski-space-mode as soon as I
get
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
On 06/15/2011 10:41 PM, Mike A. Harris wrote:
Personally, I find that indenting config files by 3 spaces has a lot
of advantages to indenting them by 4 spaces although conventional
wisdom might suggest otherwise. Who's with me on this?
Three is evil, four
Personally, I find that indenting config files by 3 spaces has a lot of
advantages to indenting them by 4 spaces although conventional wisdom
might suggest otherwise. Who's with me on this?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 04:41:44PM -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote:
Personally, I find that indenting config files by 3 spaces has a lot of
advantages to indenting them by 4 spaces although conventional wisdom
might suggest otherwise. Who's with me on this?
I'm fully capable of driving to
Mike A. Harris wrote:
Personally, I find that indenting config files by 3 spaces has a lot of
advantages to indenting them by 4 spaces although conventional wisdom
might suggest otherwise. Who's with me on this?
Indentation wars. I don't *think* there was a usenet newsgroup for that
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Mike A. Harris wrote:
Personally, I find that indenting config files by 3 spaces has a lot of
advantages to indenting them by 4 spaces although conventional wisdom
might suggest otherwise. Who's with me on this?
Indentation wars. I don't *think*
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 04:41:44PM -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote:
Personally, I find that indenting config files by 3 spaces has a lot of
advantages to indenting them by 4 spaces although conventional wisdom
might suggest otherwise. Who's with me on this?
I prefer two or four, usually two.
Cody Jackson wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 04:41:44PM -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote:
Personally, I find that indenting config files by 3 spaces has a lot of
advantages to indenting them by 4 spaces although conventional wisdom
might suggest otherwise. Who's with me on this?
I prefer two or
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Five, it goes BOOM, and, being bad in Thy Sight, will buy it.
mark
Hey, look! It's the old admin from scene 24...
--
Paul Heinlein heinl...@madboa.com http://www.madboa.com/
___
CentOS mailing
On 6/15/2011 3:41 PM, Mike A. Harris wrote:
Personally, I find that indenting config files by 3 spaces has a lot of
advantages to indenting them by 4 spaces although conventional wisdom
might suggest otherwise. Who's with me on this?
White space should be meaningless, but unnecessary changes
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 02:23:29PM -0700, Cody Jackson wrote:
I prefer two or four, usually two. Three is extremely disturbing to me
because it is not a multiple of two
I am constantly frustrated by being limited to a whole number of spaces.
What if I want pi spaces? Or e*i?
--keith
--
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Keith Keller wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 02:23:29PM -0700, Cody Jackson wrote:
I prefer two or four, usually two. Three is extremely disturbing to me
because it is not a multiple of two
I am constantly frustrated by being limited to a whole number of spaces.
What if
On 06/15/2011 10:41 PM, Mike A. Harris wrote:
Personally, I find that indenting config files by 3 spaces has a lot of
advantages to indenting them by 4 spaces although conventional wisdom
might suggest otherwise. Who's with me on this?
Three is evil, four even more. Two spaces and what do
20 matches
Mail list logo
