I was back onsite and trying it again, in vain. Copied the conf from
another site's working setup and dumped directly, recreated with the
same names and all. No go.
So again removed and install samba again, made a blank conf file, fire
up SWAT and did the most basic config.
Even chmod 777 the
On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 17:46 +0800, Noob Centos Admin wrote:
I was back onsite and trying it again, in vain. Copied the conf from
another site's working setup and dumped directly, recreated with the
same names and all. No go.
So again removed and install samba again, made a blank conf file,
Noob Centos Admin wrote:
I was back onsite and trying it again, in vain. Copied the conf from
another site's working setup and dumped directly, recreated with the
same names and all. No go.
So again removed and install samba again, made a blank conf file, fire
up SWAT and did the most basic
on 3-6-2009 1:46 AM Noob Centos Admin spake the following:
I was back onsite and trying it again, in vain. Copied the conf from
another site's working setup and dumped directly, recreated with the
same names and all. No go.
So again removed and install samba again, made a blank conf file,
On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 14:53 -0800, Scott Silva wrote:
on 3-6-2009 1:46 AM Noob Centos Admin spake the following:
I was back onsite and trying it again, in vain. Copied the conf from
another site's working setup and dumped directly, recreated with the
same names and all. No go.
So
on 2-23-2009 10:53 AM Noob Centos Admin spake the following:
Everytime I have to setup samba to handle Windows users, sometime
inadvertently goes wrong or doesn't work the way I expected, or takes
forever to setup, especially when there are many users and various
policies. So far, the easiest,
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 3:57 AM, Scott Silva ssi...@sgvwater.com wrote:
Learn to use a file editor and edit the configs yourself. That is the only way
to have the best control.
That's generally how I try to do things, except sometimes hand
written doesn't work the way I expect it to. Then I'd
on 3-5-2009 12:03 PM Noob Centos Admin spake the following:
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 3:57 AM, Scott Silva
ssilva-m4n3GYAQT2lWk0Htik3J/w...@public.gmane.org wrote:
Learn to use a file editor and edit the configs yourself. That is the only
way
to have the best control.
That's generally how
Noob Centos Admin wrote:
I'm seriously befuddled by Samba now.
I followed the good advice given and got the previous server set up nicely.
I did the same thing on another one and it refuses to work.
1. useradd some users
2. gpasswd -a them to a staff group nd smbpasswd -a them
3. chmod
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 2:21 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
But, if you want to do it the hard way, you probably have an
Unfortunately I do want to do it the hard way. While the SME server
would make things really easy, the lesson I learnt in the past with
easy thing is that, once
On Sun, 2009-03-01 at 02:44 +0800, Noob Centos Admin wrote:
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 2:21 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
But, if you want to do it the hard way, you probably have an
Unfortunately I do want to do it the hard way. While the SME server
would make things really
Noob Centos Admin wrote:
But, if you want to do it the hard way, you probably have an
Unfortunately I do want to do it the hard way. While the SME server
would make things really easy, the lesson I learnt in the past with
easy thing is that, once something break, I will really have no idea
On Sun, 2009-03-01 at 02:44 +0800, Noob Centos Admin wrote:
you aren't too concerned about security, you can change this to
'security = share' and then you can browse before authenticating, and
also have the option to authenticate as different users when connecting
to different shares on
I'm seriously befuddled by Samba now.
I followed the good advice given and got the previous server set up nicely.
I did the same thing on another one and it refuses to work.
1. useradd some users
2. gpasswd -a them to a staff group nd smbpasswd -a them
3. chmod g+s the staff directory
4. tested
From: Noob Centos Admin centos.ad...@gmail.com
8. tail -f samba logs but nothing happens, it's like samba never see
the incoming request. Note that it doesn't log anything with smbclient
-L either.
Did you try to raise the log level (log level = 3)?
I'm almost certain now that samba coder
On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 17:59 +0800, Noob Centos Admin wrote:
I'm seriously befuddled by Samba now.
I followed the good advice given and got the previous server set up nicely.
I did the same thing on another one and it refuses to work.
1. useradd some users
2. gpasswd -a them to a staff
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 5:52 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a windows domain or AD in this picture somewhere?
Not at all for all the usual Windows network migrations I've been
setting up. Typically small offices with less than 20 people so they
simply used workgroups
Noob Centos Admin wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 5:52 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a windows domain or AD in this picture somewhere?
Not at all for all the usual Windows network migrations I've been
setting up. Typically small offices with less than 20 people so
Noob Centos Admin wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 1:20 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
That makes it somewhat harder to use multiple machines since you end up
having to create and maintain passwords on each.
True, but the usual work behaviour here means that seldom happen. Even
Everytime I have to setup samba to handle Windows users, sometime
inadvertently goes wrong or doesn't work the way I expected, or takes
forever to setup, especially when there are many users and various policies.
So far, the easiest, sureest and quickest method appears to be install
WindowsXP into
On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 02:53 +0800, Noob Centos Admin wrote:
Everytime I have to setup samba to handle Windows users, sometime
inadvertently goes wrong or doesn't work the way I expected, or takes
forever to setup, especially when there are many users and various
policies. So far, the easiest,
Noob Centos Admin wrote:
So far I've tried the following which all don't quite work.
1. CentOS's samba configuration tool
- added users never show up on the share configuration so the only shares it
could create was for public access.
The samba configuration tool (system-config-samba)
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 3:12 AM, Craig White craigwh...@azapple.com wrote:
probably not the answer you want to hear but...
swat is supposed to be the tool for simple administration.
I was afraid of that. By the time I gave up and completed the task manually,
I was thinking maybe it might be
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 3:23 AM, Ned Slider n...@unixmail.co.uk wrote:
The samba configuration tool (system-config-samba) is finally fixed in
5.3 (due out soon) and will now correctly show added samba users :-)
Honestly, I'm so glad to see this! Although I won't likely benefit from it
until
Noob Centos Admin wrote:
probably not the answer you want to hear but...
swat is supposed to be the tool for simple administration.
I was afraid of that. By the time I gave up and completed the task
manually, I was thinking maybe it might be easier to write my own script
to
25 matches
Mail list logo
