From: Nataraj incoming-cen...@rjl.com
Are there any advantages to running FreeNX over vncserver? Does it
perform better?
Unless I am mistaken:
VNC traffic is bitmap (whole screen or part of the screen, optionaly
compressed)
transfered at each refresh.
FreeNX is compressed/cached XWindow
Nataraj wrote:
Stephen Harris wrote:
Even another ISP may not help so much. I have Verizon FIOS and am based on
the East Coast. There's a 92ms delay to reach my linode, in Fremont.
Any message the X client sends to the server and then waits for a reply would
have approx 200ms round trip
On 7/28/2010 12:19 AM, Nataraj wrote:
Are there any advantages to running FreeNX over vncserver? Does it
perform better?
I have run both. On a local network, they are about the same. Over the
Internet, FreeNX is much more responsive.
--
Bowie
Stephen Harris wrote:
Even another ISP may not help so much. I have Verizon FIOS and am based on
the East Coast. There's a 92ms delay to reach my linode, in Fremont.
Any message the X client sends to the server and then waits for a reply would
have approx 200ms round trip time. I doesn't
Hi all. I need to run X on a headless server, and I am having a hard
time configuring null devices in xorg.conf. Here are the server's
vital stats as per the getinfo.sh script on centos.org:
http://pastebin.centos.org/33908
When I try to start X:
[r...@centos-55-32-minimal ~]# startx
xauth:
On 25 July 2010 16:15, Dotan Cohen dotanco...@gmail.com wrote:
experiments. Should I post the logfiles? Note that my goal is to start
X, then ssh in and run Firefox remotely from a Fedora desktop. The
server itself has no monitor.
I'm not sure what you are trying to do. Using VNC server or ssh
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 18:26, Hakan Koseoglu ha...@koseoglu.org wrote:
I'm not sure what you are trying to do. Using VNC server or ssh with
X11 tunneling (-X or -Y) would make more sense.
You don't need X itself running for either of these.
Yes, my intention is to ssh in then run the app
Am 25.07.2010 17:15, schrieb Dotan Cohen:
Note that my goal is to start
X, then ssh in and run Firefox remotely from a Fedora desktop. The
server itself has no monitor.
Thanks in advance for any advice.
For that you do not need an X server on the remote machine all you need
is X11
Dotan,
On 25 July 2010 16:32, Dotan Cohen dotanco...@gmail.com wrote:
However, when I do this I get no response (no firefox window opens, no
terminal output), even after several minutes. I figured that was
because X is not running.
That's not the reason. You don't run X on the server for such
Dotan Cohen wrote:
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 18:26, Hakan Koseoglu ha...@koseoglu.org wrote:
I'm not sure what you are trying to do. Using VNC server or ssh with
X11 tunneling (-X or -Y) would make more sense.
You don't need X itself running for either of these.
Yes, my intention is to ssh
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 9:10 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
What you are trying should work without running X at the console, but you
might
like the freenx/NX client even better. That gives you a complete remote X
desktop with very good performance that you can disconnect and
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 18:38, Hakan Koseoglu ha...@koseoglu.org wrote:
Dotan,
On 25 July 2010 16:32, Dotan Cohen dotanco...@gmail.com wrote:
However, when I do this I get no response (no firefox window opens, no
terminal output), even after several minutes. I figured that was
because X is
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 19:14, Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 9:10 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
What you are trying should work without running X at the console, but you
might
like the freenx/NX client even better. That gives you a complete
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 07:23:03PM +0300, Dotan Cohen wrote:
I don't. After 15 minutes the square of the supposed Firefox window
came up. That's painful! But therein lies the problem.
Which shows it's working... but painfully slowly. Bandwidth and especially
latency is killing you.
FreeNX is
Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 9:10 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
What you are trying should work without running X at the console, but you
might
like the freenx/NX client even better. That gives you a complete remote X
desktop with very good performance that
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
You need to be somewhat careful these days about things that came from
centos-testing or extras as some now also appear in epel with the same names
and
version number that aren't likely to be coordinated. I haven't
Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
You need to be somewhat careful these days about things that came from
centos-testing or extras as some now also appear in epel with the same names
and
version number that aren't likely to be
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 19:35, Stephen Harris li...@spuddy.org wrote:
Which shows it's working... but painfully slowly. Bandwidth and especially
latency is killing you.
Other than getting a new ISP, is there anything that I can do about the latency?
FreeNX is designed to work around this
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 20:29, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
You need to be somewhat careful these days about things that came from
centos-testing or extras as some now also appear in epel
Dotan Cohen wrote:
EPEL is generally known to not overwrite distro files, but when it
starts showing conflicts with the CentOS extras repo, that needs an
additional note.
I think the point is that CentOS isn't 'the distro' that epel doesn't
overwrite.
And it really makes more sense for
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 08:46:08PM +0300, Dotan Cohen wrote:
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 19:35, Stephen Harris li...@spuddy.org wrote:
Which shows it's working... but painfully slowly. ??Bandwidth and especially
latency is killing you.
Other than getting a new ISP, is there anything that I can
Dotan Cohen wrote:
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 19:35, Stephen Harris li...@spuddy.org wrote:
Which shows it's working... but painfully slowly. Bandwidth and especially
latency is killing you.
Other than getting a new ISP, is there anything that I can do about the
latency?
I can smoothly run
Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
Dotan Cohen wrote:
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 19:35, Stephen Harris li...@spuddy.org wrote:
Which shows it's working... but painfully slowly. Bandwidth and especially
latency is killing you.
Other than getting a new ISP, is there anything that I can do about
At Mon, 26 Jul 2010 07:17:45 +0800 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
Dotan Cohen wrote:
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 19:35, Stephen Harris li...@spuddy.org wrote:
Which shows it's working... but painfully slowly. Bandwidth and especially
latency is killing you.
Other than
24 matches
Mail list logo
