Re: [CentOS] Firefox fix

to firefox 102.15.0. -From: jefflp...@twc.com To: "centos@centos.org" Cc: Sent: Tuesday February 6 2024 1:28:55PM Subject: [CentOS] Firefox fix The latest upgrade of firefox to 115.7.0 appears to have fixed whatever was causing versi

[CentOS] Firefox fix

The latest upgrade of firefox to 115.7.0 appears to have fixed whatever was causing version 115.6.0 to crash. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Firefox, C-7, and... reboot?

Last night, for the second or third time since I upgraded from C6 to c7 this summer, I did something on firefox - I think it was reload a page, and my system rebooted. Yes, I have a ton of tabs open. I see nothing suspicious in /var/log/messages, or in /var/log/dmesg.old. I saw a mention of

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 78 under CentOS 6 -- no sound?

On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 at 11:29, James Pearson wrote: > Jonathan Billings wrote: > > > > Amazingly it appears that Red Hat has released another Firefox: > > Red Hat just follow the Mozilla ESR stream release cycle, which is > currently ESR 78 with point releases come out every 4 weeks or so > >

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 78 under CentOS 6 -- no sound?

Jonathan Billings wrote: > > Amazingly it appears that Red Hat has released another Firefox: Red Hat just follow the Mozilla ESR stream release cycle, which is currently ESR 78 with point releases come out every 4 weeks or so Each ESR stream is supported by Mozilla for about a year, with each

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 78 under CentOS 6 -- no sound?

On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 01:21:10PM +0100, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote: > > Am 26.10.20 um 12:45 schrieb Jonathan Billings: > > On Oct 23, 2020, at 14:45, Leon Fauster via CentOS > > wrote: > > > Mozilla released version 68.12.0, on August 25, 2020 -> > > >

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 78 under CentOS 6 -- no sound?

Am 26.10.20 um 12:45 schrieb Jonathan Billings: On Oct 23, 2020, at 14:45, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote: Mozilla released version 68.12.0, on August 25, 2020 -> https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/68.12.0/releasenotes/ RH has an ELS phase - if it gets fixed then only for paying customers.

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 78 under CentOS 6 -- no sound?

On Oct 23, 2020, at 14:45, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote: > Mozilla released version 68.12.0, on August 25, 2020 -> > https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/68.12.0/releasenotes/ > > RH has an ELS phase - if it gets fixed then only for paying customers. Amazingly it appears that Red Hat has

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 78 under CentOS 6 -- no sound?

Am 23.10.20 um 11:18 schrieb James Pearson: Peter wrote: What confuses me here is why would Red Hat rebase a package so close to EOL. Now that they have they're stuck with either leaving a severly broken firefox or providing a fix less than 6 weeks before EOL. I honestly don't know which way

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 78 under CentOS 6 -- no sound?

On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 at 05:19, James Pearson wrote: > Peter wrote: > > > > What confuses me here is why would Red Hat rebase a package so close to > > EOL. Now that they have they're stuck with either leaving a severly > > broken firefox or providing a fix less than 6 weeks before EOL. I > >

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 78 under CentOS 6 -- no sound?

Peter wrote: > > What confuses me here is why would Red Hat rebase a package so close to > EOL. Now that they have they're stuck with either leaving a severly > broken firefox or providing a fix less than 6 weeks before EOL. I > honestly don't know which way they'll go here but it just seems to

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 78 under CentOS 6 -- no sound?

On 22/10/20 10:25 am, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: Basically that says that upstream no longer thinks that Firefox is runnable on RHEL-6/CentOS-6 anymore. I think there was a similar problem at the end of EL-5 when a 'YOU HAVE TO UPGRADE' fix from Mozilla was released and while a lot of work was

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 78 under CentOS 6 -- no sound?

On Wednesday 21 October 2020, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > [yves@home firefox]$ ./firefox > > ./firefox: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.17' not found > > (required by ./firefox) > > ./firefox: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found > > (required by ./firefox) > > > > CentOS 6

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 78 under CentOS 6 -- no sound?

> > Basically that says that upstream no longer thinks that Firefox is runnable > on RHEL-6/CentOS-6 anymore. I think there was a similar problem at the end > of EL-5 when a 'YOU HAVE TO UPGRADE' fix from Mozilla was released and > while a lot of work was done by Red Hat to get it to work on

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 78 under CentOS 6 -- no sound?

On Wed, 21 Oct 2020 at 14:03, Yves Bellefeuille wrote: > Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote: > > > ... or a general problem. Does some one tried the version from > > mozilla? > > > > https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/all/#product-desktop-esr > > > > Can't test it - I don't run EL6

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 78 under CentOS 6 -- no sound?

Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote: > ... or a general problem. Does some one tried the version from > mozilla? > > https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/all/#product-desktop-esr > > Can't test it - I don't run EL6 workstations anymore ... [yves@home firefox]$ ./firefox ./firefox:

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 78 under CentOS 6 -- no sound?

On 10/20/20 3:32 PM, Robert Nichols wrote: > On 10/20/20 2:45 PM, Robert Heller wrote: >> At Tue, 20 Oct 2020 13:35:59 -0400 CentOS mailing list >> wrote: >> >>> >>> Jonathan Billings wrote: >>>   I'm less concerned with firefox being broken on 32-bit CentOS 6   systems when the

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 78 under CentOS 6 -- no sound?

Am 21.10.20 um 01:00 schrieb Robert Heller: At Tue, 20 Oct 2020 14:07:27 -0600 CentOS mailing list wrote: On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 15:45:54 -0400 (EDT) Robert Heller wrote: Does FF 78 sound work properly in CentOS 7 and 8? firefox-78.2.0-2.el8_2.x86_64 Working fine for me here on several

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 78 under CentOS 6 -- no sound?

Robert Heller wrote: > OK, so it is a FF78 / RHel 6 (implies CentOS 6) specific problem. I've reported it to Red Hat as bug 1889920: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889920 -- Yves Bellefeuille ___ CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 78 under CentOS 6 -- no sound?

At Tue, 20 Oct 2020 14:07:27 -0600 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 15:45:54 -0400 (EDT) > Robert Heller wrote: > > > Does FF 78 sound work properly in CentOS 7 and 8? > > firefox-78.2.0-2.el8_2.x86_64 > > Working fine for me here on several computers. OK, so it is a

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 78 under CentOS 6 -- no sound?

On 10/20/20 2:45 PM, Robert Heller wrote: At Tue, 20 Oct 2020 13:35:59 -0400 CentOS mailing list wrote: Jonathan Billings wrote: I'm less concerned with firefox being broken on 32-bit CentOS 6 systems when the platform is only going to live for another month. Frankly, I'm glad to

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 78 under CentOS 6 -- no sound?

On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 15:45:54 -0400 (EDT) Robert Heller wrote: > Does FF 78 sound work properly in CentOS 7 and 8? firefox-78.2.0-2.el8_2.x86_64 Working fine for me here on several computers. -- Can we uninstall 2020 and install it again? This one has a virus. MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 78 under CentOS 6 -- no sound?

On 10/20/20 2:04 PM, R C wrote: > RHEL 6 has the same problem, also firefox 78 on a 64 bit machine. And if this is the case, it should also be broken in CentOS until it is fixed in RHEL source code. > > > On 10/20/20 11:35 AM, Yves Bellefeuille wrote: >> Jonathan Billings wrote: >> >>>   I'm

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 78 under CentOS 6 -- no sound?

At Tue, 20 Oct 2020 13:35:59 -0400 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > Jonathan Billings wrote: > > > I'm less concerned with firefox being broken on 32-bit CentOS 6 > > systems when the platform is only going to live for another month. > > Frankly, I'm glad to see flash die just a little

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 78 under CentOS 6 -- no sound?

At Tue, 20 Oct 2020 13:35:59 -0400 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > Jonathan Billings wrote: > > > I'm less concerned with firefox being broken on 32-bit CentOS 6 > > systems when the platform is only going to live for another month. > > Frankly, I'm glad to see flash die just a little

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 78 under CentOS 6 -- no sound?

RHEL 6 has the same problem, also firefox 78 on a 64 bit machine. On 10/20/20 11:35 AM, Yves Bellefeuille wrote: Jonathan Billings wrote: I'm less concerned with firefox being broken on 32-bit CentOS 6 systems when the platform is only going to live for another month. Frankly, I'm

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 78 under CentOS 6 -- no sound?

Jonathan Billings wrote: > I'm less concerned with firefox being broken on 32-bit CentOS 6 > systems when the platform is only going to live for another month. > Frankly, I'm glad to see flash die just a little earlier. It isn't just 32-bit, but also 64-bit, and it isn't just Flash, but also

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 78 under CentOS 6 -- no sound?

At Tue, 20 Oct 2020 12:56:38 -0400 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > Akemi Yagi wrote: > > > This issue? > > > > https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=17767 > > This is a huge bug! Using Firefox to watch videos is a basic activity. Even worse is that it is a failure for Google Voice and

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 78 under CentOS 6 -- no sound?

On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 12:56:38PM -0400, Yves Bellefeuille wrote: > Akemi Yagi wrote: > > > This issue? > > > > https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=17767 > > This is a huge bug! Using Firefox to watch videos is a basic activity. > > The bug with grub2 a few months ago was even more serious:

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 78 under CentOS 6 -- no sound?

Akemi Yagi wrote: > This issue? > > https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=17767 This is a huge bug! Using Firefox to watch videos is a basic activity. The bug with grub2 a few months ago was even more serious: it made systems unbootable. It's discomfiting to see two major bugs so close to each

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 78 under CentOS 6 -- no sound?

On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 10:26:50PM -0500, Robert Nichols wrote: > On 10/17/20 3:38 PM, Robert Heller wrote: > > I did a yum update on my CentOS 6 laptop and it upgraded Firefox to 78, and > > FF stopped seeing my mic and speakers. Is there some magic I need to do? > > As > > a short term (?)

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 78 under CentOS 6 -- no sound?

On 10/17/20 3:38 PM, Robert Heller wrote: I did a yum update on my CentOS 6 laptop and it upgraded Firefox to 78, and FF stopped seeing my mic and speakers. Is there some magic I need to do? As a short term (?) fix, I downgraded back to Firefox 68. My system is otherwise up-to-date. I'm

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 78 under CentOS 6 -- no sound?

At Sat, 17 Oct 2020 19:08:49 -0500 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 3:38 PM Robert Heller wrote: > > > I did a yum update on my CentOS 6 laptop and it upgraded Firefox to 78, > > and > > FF stopped seeing my mic and speakers. Is there some magic I need to do? > > As >

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 78 under CentOS 6 -- no sound?

At Sat, 17 Oct 2020 17:34:11 -0700 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 1:38 PM Robert Heller wrote: > > > I did a yum update on my CentOS 6 laptop and it upgraded Firefox to 78, > > and > > FF stopped seeing my mic and speakers. Is there some magic I need to do? > > As >

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 78 under CentOS 6 -- no sound?

On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 1:38 PM Robert Heller wrote: > I did a yum update on my CentOS 6 laptop and it upgraded Firefox to 78, > and > FF stopped seeing my mic and speakers. Is there some magic I need to do? > As > a short term (?) fix, I downgraded back to Firefox 68. My system is > otherwise

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 78 under CentOS 6 -- no sound?

On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 3:38 PM Robert Heller wrote: > I did a yum update on my CentOS 6 laptop and it upgraded Firefox to 78, > and > FF stopped seeing my mic and speakers. Is there some magic I need to do? > As > a short term (?) fix, I downgraded back to Firefox 68. My system is > otherwise

[CentOS] Firefox 78 under CentOS 6 -- no sound?

I did a yum update on my CentOS 6 laptop and it upgraded Firefox to 78, and FF stopped seeing my mic and speakers. Is there some magic I need to do? As a short term (?) fix, I downgraded back to Firefox 68. My system is otherwise up-to-date. -- Robert Heller -- Cell:

Re: [CentOS] firefox unable to load pkcs11 module

On Sun, Apr 5, 2020 at 4:27 PM nschehovin--- via CentOS wrote: > Hi Tony, > Have you solved this problem yet?I took another approach and used CACkey > which supportsUS Government PIV cards including the CAC. In my case I set > it up on Linux Mint but there is an rpm version of CACKey for 32 or

Re: [CentOS] firefox unable to load pkcs11 module

Hi Tony, Have you solved this problem yet?I took another approach and used CACkey which supportsUS Government PIV cards including the CAC.  In my case I set it up on Linux Mint but there is an rpm version of CACKey for 32 or 64 bit Centos.Here is the process I went through. - setup CAC card by

Re: [CentOS] firefox unable to load pkcs11 module

On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 12:47 PM Tony Schreiner wrote: > CentOS 7, In firefox -> privacy & security -> certificates -> security > devices > i am trying to load the pkcs11 modules, but get the error unable to load. > > I am following the directions at >

[CentOS] firefox unable to load pkcs11 module

CentOS 7, In firefox -> privacy & security -> certificates -> security devices i am trying to load the pkcs11 modules, but get the error unable to load. I am following the directions at https://piv.idmanagement.gov/engineering/firefox/ I have installed opensc and openssl-pkcs11, which contains

Re: [CentOS] firefox update

> Date: Friday, January 10, 2020 19:10:47 + > From: Steve Clark > > Any idea when firefox-68.4.1 will be available? RH just announced the release of the update: so I expect that the

[CentOS] firefox update

Any idea when firefox-68.4.1 will be available? Thanks, Email Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this transmission may contain privileged and confidential and/or protected health information (PHI) and may be subject to protection under the law, including the Health

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 68 jnlp files

that talk about updating java. If I missed this answer, I apologize as I receive the digests. Patti Clark Sr. Linux System Administrator Oak Ridge National Laboratory >>>>>>> Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 16:21:03 + From: James Pearson To: Subject: Re: [CentOS] Firefox 68

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 68 jnlp files

isdtor wrote: It seems that firefox 68.x, as distributed with CentOS6 updates, no longer allows opening jnlp files with javaws The "Choose Helper Application" window popping up after selecting "Open with/Other" has a predefined list of applications that cannot be customised. I'm sure it

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 68 jnlp files

Leroy Tennison writes: > Not knowing what kind of server management you're looking for I can only make > general suggestions. We found that the removal of Java support (actually > NSAPI in favor of the Pepper API which Oracle has stated they won't support) > left us with limited IPMI (iLO,

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 68 jnlp files

cation to ... en.wikipedia.org From: CentOS on behalf of isdtor Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2019 8:17 AM To: centos@centos.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [CentOS] Firefox 68 jnlp files isdtor writes: > It seems that firefox 68.x, as distributed with CentOS

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 68 jnlp files

isdtor writes: > It seems that firefox 68.x, as distributed with CentOS6 updates, no longer > allows opening jnlp files with javaws > > The "Choose Helper Application" window popping up after selecting "Open > with/Other" has a predefined list of applications that cannot be customised. > > I'm

[CentOS] Firefox 68 jnlp files

It seems that firefox 68.x, as distributed with CentOS6 updates, no longer allows opening jnlp files with javaws The "Choose Helper Application" window popping up after selecting "Open with/Other" has a predefined list of applications that cannot be customised. I'm sure it must be a

Re: [CentOS] Firefox addons disabled - temporary fix

On 05/05/2019 22:21, wwp wrote: > Hello Frank, > > > On Sat, 4 May 2019 11:09:22 -0600 Frank Cox wrote: > >> The currently available fix for Firefox doesn't work with ESR, but there's a >> temporary fix that works. At least, it's working for me: >> >> Go to about:config and set

Re: [CentOS] Firefox esr repackage

> On 11/05/19 2:05 AM, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote: >>> Am 10.05.2019 um 11:12 schrieb Nux! : I maintain a desktop oriented repo for CentOS and last I checked a year or so ago, I got over 150k+ unique IPs with yum user agent downloading stuff from it. It's a bit

Re: [CentOS] Firefox esr repackage

On 11/05/19 2:05 AM, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote: Am 10.05.2019 um 11:12 schrieb Nux! : I maintain a desktop oriented repo for CentOS and last I checked a year or so ago, I got over 150k+ unique IPs with yum user agent downloading stuff from it. It's a bit anecdotal as perhaps not all are

Re: [CentOS] Firefox esr repackage

-- Original Message - > >> From: "CentOS mailing list" > >> To: "CentOS mailing list" > >> Sent: Friday, 10 May, 2019 05:40:38 > >> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Firefox esr repackage > > > >>> On 09/05/2019 09:09, Simon Matter via CentO

Re: [CentOS] Firefox esr repackage

> Am 10.05.2019 um 11:12 schrieb Nux! : >> >> I maintain a desktop oriented repo for CentOS and last I checked a year >> or so ago, I got over 150k+ unique IPs with yum user agent downloading >> stuff from it. >> >> It's a bit anecdotal as perhaps not all are actual desktop users and >> some users

Re: [CentOS] Firefox esr repackage

On 2019-05-10 04:29, wwp wrote: Hello Nux!, On Fri, 10 May 2019 10:12:59 +0100 (BST) Nux! wrote: I maintain a desktop oriented repo for CentOS and last I checked a year or so ago, I got over 150k+ unique IPs with yum user agent downloading stuff from it. It's a bit anecdotal as perhaps

Re: [CentOS] Firefox esr repackage

Am 10.05.2019 um 11:12 schrieb Nux! : > > I maintain a desktop oriented repo for CentOS and last I checked a year or so > ago, I got over 150k+ unique IPs with yum user agent downloading stuff from > it. > > It's a bit anecdotal as perhaps not all are actual desktop users and some > users

Re: [CentOS] Firefox esr repackage

Borg technology! > > Nux! > www.nux.ro > > - Original Message - >> From: "CentOS mailing list" >> To: "CentOS mailing list" >> Sent: Friday, 10 May, 2019 05:40:38 >> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Firefox esr repackage > >>> On 09

Re: [CentOS] Firefox esr repackage

Hello Nux!, On Fri, 10 May 2019 10:12:59 +0100 (BST) Nux! wrote: > I maintain a desktop oriented repo for CentOS and last I checked a year or so > ago, I got over 150k+ unique IPs with yum user agent downloading stuff from > it. > > It's a bit anecdotal as perhaps not all are actual desktop

Re: [CentOS] Firefox esr repackage

- Original Message - > From: "CentOS mailing list" > To: "CentOS mailing list" > Sent: Friday, 10 May, 2019 05:40:38 > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Firefox esr repackage >> On 09/05/2019 09:09, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote: >>>> The price we pay.. :) &

Re: [CentOS] Firefox esr repackage

it's used for running HPCs a lot On 5/9/19 10:40 PM, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote: On 09/05/2019 09:09, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote: The price we pay.. :) Do you say that paying RH customers already received new firefox packages? Regards, Simon No, Red Hat have not yet released any

Re: [CentOS] Firefox esr repackage

> On 09/05/2019 09:09, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote: >>> The price we pay.. :) >> >> Do you say that paying RH customers already received new firefox >> packages? >> >> Regards, >> Simon >> > > No, Red Hat have not yet released any updates for Firefox. I doubt it's > a priority for them. Which

Re: [CentOS] Firefox esr repackage

On 09/05/2019 09:09, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote: The price we pay.. :) Do you say that paying RH customers already received new firefox packages? Regards, Simon No, Red Hat have not yet released any updates for Firefox. I doubt it's a priority for them.

Re: [CentOS] Firefox esr repackage

No, it's the "price" we "pay" for using EL. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "Simon Matter" > To: "Nux!" > Cc: "CentOS mailing list" > Sent: Thursday, 9 Ma

Re: [CentOS] Firefox esr repackage

"CentOS mailing list" >> Sent: Wednesday, 8 May, 2019 17:24:57 >> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Firefox esr repackage > >>> I was told lately about this workaround, check it out. >>> https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2019/05/04/update-regarding-add-ons-in-firefox/ >&g

Re: [CentOS] Firefox esr repackage

quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "CentOS mailing list" > To: "CentOS mailing list" > Sent: Wednesday, 8 May, 2019 17:24:57 > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Firefox esr repackage >> I was told lately about t

Re: [CentOS] Firefox esr repackage

R C wrote: > cool!! that works for now.. thanks Mark!! Glad it helped. > > On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 11:21 AM mark wrote: > > >> firefox_repackage via CentOS wrote: >>> Hi everyone, I use firefox on centos 7 at work but due to the fairly >>> well know extension signing problem, I cannot use

Re: [CentOS] Firefox esr repackage

cool!! that works for now.. thanks Mark!! On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 11:21 AM mark wrote: > firefox_repackage via CentOS wrote: > > Hi everyone, I use firefox on centos 7 at work but due to the fairly well > > know extension signing problem, I cannot use ublock origin. > > > > From what I can

Re: [CentOS] Firefox esr repackage

firefox_repackage via CentOS wrote: > Hi everyone, I use firefox on centos 7 at work but due to the fairly well > know extension signing problem, I cannot use ublock origin. > > From what I can tell, the latest version of firefox in the updates > repository is 60.6.1-1.el7. It looks like Mozilla

Re: [CentOS] Firefox esr repackage

. Did upstream already release new packages? Regards, Simon > > -- > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > > Nux! > www.nux.ro > > - Original Message - >> From: "CentOS mailing list" >> To: "CentOS mailing list" >>

Re: [CentOS] Firefox esr repackage

To: "CentOS mailing list" > > Sent: Wednesday, 8 May, 2019 16:50:20 > > Subject: [CentOS] Firefox esr repackage > > > Hi everyone, I use firefox on centos 7 at work but due to the fairly > well know > > extension signing problem, I cannot use ublock origin. &g

Re: [CentOS] Firefox esr repackage

t;CentOS mailing list" > Sent: Wednesday, 8 May, 2019 16:50:20 > Subject: [CentOS] Firefox esr repackage > Hi everyone, I use firefox on centos 7 at work but due to the fairly well know > extension signing problem, I cannot use ublock origin. > > From what I can tell,

Re: [CentOS] Firefox esr repackage

might fix the signing issue... but a lot of plugins/addons broke... like the restclient ... dangit... On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 9:50 AM firefox_repackage via CentOS < centos@centos.org> wrote: > Hi everyone, I use firefox on centos 7 at work but due to the fairly well > know extension signing

[CentOS] Firefox esr repackage

Hi everyone, I use firefox on centos 7 at work but due to the fairly well know extension signing problem, I cannot use ublock origin. >From what I can tell, the latest version of firefox in the updates repository >is 60.6.1-1.el7. It looks like Mozilla have just released firefox esr 60.6.2

Re: [CentOS] Firefox addons disabled - temporary fix

Hello Frank, On Sat, 4 May 2019 11:09:22 -0600 Frank Cox wrote: > The currently available fix for Firefox doesn't work with ESR, but there's a > temporary fix that works. At least, it's working for me: > > Go to about:config and set xpinstall.signatures.required to false. [snip] And

Re: [CentOS] Firefox addons disabled - temporary fix

Le 04/05/2019 à 19:09, Frank Cox a écrit : > The Firefox folks say that a fix for ESR will be coming at some > point, but at least this gets things working again in the short > term. uBlock Origin has been disabled on all our machines here, and all Firefox installations switched from french to

Re: [CentOS] Firefox addons disabled - temporary fix

On Sat, 4 May 2019 19:20:02 +0200 Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote: > There (Mozilla's) certificate expired, that is the reason. IMHO ignoring > signatures checks is not the way to go. It opens a (small) attack window. I suppose you pick your poison. Your other choices are to use a different web

Re: [CentOS] Firefox addons disabled - temporary fix

> Am 04.05.2019 um 19:09 schrieb Frank Cox : > > The currently available fix for Firefox doesn't work with ESR, but there's a > temporary fix that works. At least, it's working for me: > > Go to about:config and set xpinstall.signatures.required to false. > > The Firefox folks say that a

[CentOS] Firefox addons disabled - temporary fix

The currently available fix for Firefox doesn't work with ESR, but there's a temporary fix that works. At least, it's working for me: Go to about:config and set xpinstall.signatures.required to false. The Firefox folks say that a fix for ESR will be coming at some point, but at least this

[CentOS] Firefox view downloads folder - changed program

Hi All, A short while back, Firefox changed from using (I believe) Dolphin to using gwenview when I choose 'view in container' or 'view all downloads'. The problem with this is that when I choose 'view in containter' it no longer selects the appropriate file. Does anyone know how to change

Re: [CentOS] firefox-60.5.0-2.el7.centos.x86_64 and Netflix

Bernard Lheureux: > > Since the last upgrade to firefox-60.5.0-2.el7.centos.x86_64 on my > CentOS 7, it is no longer possible to watch Netflix with my Firefox, it > always says that "Firefox is installing components needed to play the > audio or video on this page. Please try again later." > But

Re: [CentOS] firefox-60.5.0-2.el7.centos.x86_64 and Netflix

On Sat, 2019-02-09 at 15:10 +0100, Bernard Lheureux wrote: > Hi all, > > Since the last upgrade to firefox-60.5.0-2.el7.centos.x86_64 on my > CentOS 7, it is no longer possible to watch Netflix with my Firefox, > it > always says that "Firefox is installing components needed to play > the >

Re: [CentOS] firefox-60.5.0-2.el7.centos.x86_64 and Netflix

On 09/02/2019 15:12, Glênio Côrtes Himmen wrote: Really not the answer I expect... I hope a corrected version of Firefox will soon be released ! Install Google Chrome. Em Sáb, 9 de fev de 2019 12:11, Bernard Lheureux < bernard.lheur...@bbsoft4.org> escreveu: Hi all, Since the last upgrade

Re: [CentOS] firefox-60.5.0-2.el7.centos.x86_64 and Netflix

Install Google Chrome. Em Sáb, 9 de fev de 2019 12:11, Bernard Lheureux < bernard.lheur...@bbsoft4.org> escreveu: > Hi all, > > Since the last upgrade to firefox-60.5.0-2.el7.centos.x86_64 on my > CentOS 7, it is no longer possible to watch Netflix with my Firefox, it > always says that "Firefox

[CentOS] firefox-60.5.0-2.el7.centos.x86_64 and Netflix

Hi all, Since the last upgrade to firefox-60.5.0-2.el7.centos.x86_64 on my CentOS 7, it is no longer possible to watch Netflix with my Firefox, it always says that "Firefox is installing components needed to play the audio or video on this page. Please try again later." But nothing happens

[CentOS] Firefox showing bogus sites after 'yum update'

I have just done a yum update for the first time in a while, and as part of that I believe Firefox got upgraded. After the reboot I restarted Firefox which had been closed down with the option to retain all open tabs/windows. However, when I restarted Firefox it had three new tabs, one being

Re: [CentOS] Firefox Video Capability

On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 at 08:03, Chris Olson via CentOS wrote: > > One of our summer interns has stayed on during the school > year to work some weekends on special projects. This past > weekend, her assignment was to trouble shoot problems with > Firefox when trying to view various on-line training

[CentOS] Firefox Video Capability

One of our summer interns has stayed on during the school year to work some weekends on special projects. This past weekend, her assignment was to trouble shoot problems with Firefox when trying to view various on-line training videos. At some web sites, the video associated with the page will

Re: [CentOS] Firefox Issue

On 17/09/18 21:54, Chris Olson via CentOS wrote: We have several small networks, some of which have only four systems that are usually a mix of Windows 7 and CentOS 6 and CentOS 7 machines. All of these systems are Internet connected and updated regularly when yum finds packages available. 

[CentOS] Firefox Issue

We have several small networks, some of which have only four systems that are usually a mix of Windows 7 and CentOS 6 and CentOS 7 machines. All of these systems are Internet connected and updated regularly when yum finds packages available.  Information about one of the CentOS 6 machines is

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 60 crashes when trying to save an image [OT]

On 07/18/2018 09:37 AM, Matthew Phelps wrote: > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 6:55 PM Johnny Hughes wrote: > >> On 07/17/2018 05:51 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> On 07/15/2018 03:00 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 12:13 PM, Leon Fauster via CentOS < >> centos@centos.org > wrote:

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 60 crashes when trying to save an image [OT]

On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 6:55 PM Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 07/17/2018 05:51 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > On 07/15/2018 03:00 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > >> On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 12:13 PM, Leon Fauster via CentOS < > centos@centos.org > >>> wrote: > >> > >>> Am 15.07.2018 um 20:03 schrieb Nicolas

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 60 crashes when trying to save an image [OT]

On 07/17/2018 05:51 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 07/15/2018 03:00 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >> On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 12:13 PM, Leon Fauster via CentOS >> wrote: >> >>> Am 15.07.2018 um 20:03 schrieb Nicolas Kovacs : Le 15/07/2018 à 19:49, Matthew Phelps a écrit : > This is a known

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 60 crashes when trying to save an image [OT]

On 07/15/2018 03:00 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 12:13 PM, Leon Fauster via CentOS > wrote: > >> Am 15.07.2018 um 20:03 schrieb Nicolas Kovacs : >>> >>> Le 15/07/2018 à 19:49, Matthew Phelps a écrit : This is a known issue. See

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 60 crashes when trying to save an image

On 07/15/2018 12:49 PM, Matthew Phelps wrote: This is a known issue. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1596852 for a patch to the /usr/bin/firefox wrapper script. On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 1:19 PM Robert Nichols wrote: On any web page with an image, if i right-click on the

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 60 crashes when trying to save an image [OT]

On Sun, 15 Jul 2018 17:47:04 -0600 Frank Cox wrote: > This is peculiar. I just tried right-clicking on an image, then "Save Image > As" and it worked fine. And that would be because I'm using Centos 7 and not Centos 6 where this bug applies. *Cough* Sorry about the noise, folks. --

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 60 crashes when trying to save an image [OT]

On Sun, 15 Jul 2018 19:08:50 -0400 Matthew Phelps wrote: > Any file operation, i.e. one that opens the file chooser, or tries to print > to a file, will fail because of the bug I mentioned in another thread, > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1596852 This is peculiar. I just tried

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 60 crashes when trying to save an image [OT]

On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 4:00 PM Kay Schenk wrote: > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 12:13 PM, Leon Fauster via CentOS < > centos@centos.org > > wrote: > > > Am 15.07.2018 um 20:03 schrieb Nicolas Kovacs : > > > > > > Le 15/07/2018 à 19:49, Matthew Phelps a écrit : > > >> This is a known issue. See > >

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 60 crashes when trying to save an image [OT]

On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 12:13 PM, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote: > Am 15.07.2018 um 20:03 schrieb Nicolas Kovacs : > > > > Le 15/07/2018 à 19:49, Matthew Phelps a écrit : > >> This is a known issue. See > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1596852 for a patch to the > >>

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 60 crashes when trying to save an image [OT]

Am 15.07.2018 um 20:03 schrieb Nicolas Kovacs : > > Le 15/07/2018 à 19:49, Matthew Phelps a écrit : >> This is a known issue. See >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1596852 for a patch to the >> /usr/bin/firefox wrapper script. > > On a side note, I've been using Firefox since

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 60 crashes when trying to save an image [OT]

Le 15/07/2018 à 19:49, Matthew Phelps a écrit : > This is a known issue. See > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1596852 for a patch to the > /usr/bin/firefox wrapper script. On a side note, I've been using Firefox since version 0.99 around 2003, when it wasn't even called Firefox but

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >