On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 at 11:29, James Pearson
wrote:
> Jonathan Billings wrote:
> >
> > Amazingly it appears that Red Hat has released another Firefox:
>
> Red Hat just follow the Mozilla ESR stream release cycle, which is
> currently ESR 78 with point releases come out every 4 weeks or so
>
>
Jonathan Billings wrote:
>
> Amazingly it appears that Red Hat has released another Firefox:
Red Hat just follow the Mozilla ESR stream release cycle, which is currently
ESR 78 with point releases come out every 4 weeks or so
Each ESR stream is supported by Mozilla for about a year, with each
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 01:21:10PM +0100, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote:
>
> Am 26.10.20 um 12:45 schrieb Jonathan Billings:
> > On Oct 23, 2020, at 14:45, Leon Fauster via CentOS
> > wrote:
> > > Mozilla released version 68.12.0, on August 25, 2020 ->
> > >
Am 26.10.20 um 12:45 schrieb Jonathan Billings:
On Oct 23, 2020, at 14:45, Leon Fauster via CentOS
wrote:
Mozilla released version 68.12.0, on August 25, 2020 ->
https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/68.12.0/releasenotes/
RH has an ELS phase - if it gets fixed then only for paying customers.
On Oct 23, 2020, at 14:45, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote:
> Mozilla released version 68.12.0, on August 25, 2020 ->
> https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/68.12.0/releasenotes/
>
> RH has an ELS phase - if it gets fixed then only for paying customers.
Amazingly it appears that Red Hat has
Am 23.10.20 um 11:18 schrieb James Pearson:
Peter wrote:
What confuses me here is why would Red Hat rebase a package so close to
EOL. Now that they have they're stuck with either leaving a severly
broken firefox or providing a fix less than 6 weeks before EOL. I
honestly don't know which way
On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 at 05:19, James Pearson
wrote:
> Peter wrote:
> >
> > What confuses me here is why would Red Hat rebase a package so close to
> > EOL. Now that they have they're stuck with either leaving a severly
> > broken firefox or providing a fix less than 6 weeks before EOL. I
> >
Peter wrote:
>
> What confuses me here is why would Red Hat rebase a package so close to
> EOL. Now that they have they're stuck with either leaving a severly
> broken firefox or providing a fix less than 6 weeks before EOL. I
> honestly don't know which way they'll go here but it just seems to
On 22/10/20 10:25 am, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
Basically that says that upstream no longer thinks that Firefox is runnable
on RHEL-6/CentOS-6 anymore. I think there was a similar problem at the end
of EL-5 when a 'YOU HAVE TO UPGRADE' fix from Mozilla was released and
while a lot of work was
On Wednesday 21 October 2020, Stephen John Smoogen
wrote:
> > [yves@home firefox]$ ./firefox
> > ./firefox: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.17' not found
> > (required by ./firefox)
> > ./firefox: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found
> > (required by ./firefox)
> >
> > CentOS 6
>
> Basically that says that upstream no longer thinks that Firefox is runnable
> on RHEL-6/CentOS-6 anymore. I think there was a similar problem at the end
> of EL-5 when a 'YOU HAVE TO UPGRADE' fix from Mozilla was released and
> while a lot of work was done by Red Hat to get it to work on
On Wed, 21 Oct 2020 at 14:03, Yves Bellefeuille wrote:
> Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote:
>
> > ... or a general problem. Does some one tried the version from
> > mozilla?
> >
> > https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/all/#product-desktop-esr
> >
> > Can't test it - I don't run EL6
Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote:
> ... or a general problem. Does some one tried the version from
> mozilla?
>
> https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/all/#product-desktop-esr
>
> Can't test it - I don't run EL6 workstations anymore ...
[yves@home firefox]$ ./firefox
./firefox:
On 10/20/20 3:32 PM, Robert Nichols wrote:
> On 10/20/20 2:45 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
>> At Tue, 20 Oct 2020 13:35:59 -0400 CentOS mailing list
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Jonathan Billings wrote:
>>>
I'm less concerned with firefox being broken on 32-bit CentOS 6
systems when the
Am 21.10.20 um 01:00 schrieb Robert Heller:
At Tue, 20 Oct 2020 14:07:27 -0600 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 15:45:54 -0400 (EDT)
Robert Heller wrote:
Does FF 78 sound work properly in CentOS 7 and 8?
firefox-78.2.0-2.el8_2.x86_64
Working fine for me here on several
Robert Heller wrote:
> OK, so it is a FF78 / RHel 6 (implies CentOS 6) specific problem.
I've reported it to Red Hat as bug 1889920:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889920
--
Yves Bellefeuille
___
CentOS mailing list
At Tue, 20 Oct 2020 14:07:27 -0600 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 15:45:54 -0400 (EDT)
> Robert Heller wrote:
>
> > Does FF 78 sound work properly in CentOS 7 and 8?
>
> firefox-78.2.0-2.el8_2.x86_64
>
> Working fine for me here on several computers.
OK, so it is a
On 10/20/20 2:45 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
At Tue, 20 Oct 2020 13:35:59 -0400 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
Jonathan Billings wrote:
I'm less concerned with firefox being broken on 32-bit CentOS 6
systems when the platform is only going to live for another month.
Frankly, I'm glad to
On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 15:45:54 -0400 (EDT)
Robert Heller wrote:
> Does FF 78 sound work properly in CentOS 7 and 8?
firefox-78.2.0-2.el8_2.x86_64
Working fine for me here on several computers.
--
Can we uninstall 2020 and install it again? This one has a virus.
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D
On 10/20/20 2:04 PM, R C wrote:
> RHEL 6 has the same problem, also firefox 78 on a 64 bit machine.
And if this is the case, it should also be broken in CentOS until it is
fixed in RHEL source code.
>
>
> On 10/20/20 11:35 AM, Yves Bellefeuille wrote:
>> Jonathan Billings wrote:
>>
>>> I'm
At Tue, 20 Oct 2020 13:35:59 -0400 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> Jonathan Billings wrote:
>
> > I'm less concerned with firefox being broken on 32-bit CentOS 6
> > systems when the platform is only going to live for another month.
> > Frankly, I'm glad to see flash die just a little
At Tue, 20 Oct 2020 13:35:59 -0400 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> Jonathan Billings wrote:
>
> > I'm less concerned with firefox being broken on 32-bit CentOS 6
> > systems when the platform is only going to live for another month.
> > Frankly, I'm glad to see flash die just a little
RHEL 6 has the same problem, also firefox 78 on a 64 bit machine.
On 10/20/20 11:35 AM, Yves Bellefeuille wrote:
Jonathan Billings wrote:
I'm less concerned with firefox being broken on 32-bit CentOS 6
systems when the platform is only going to live for another month.
Frankly, I'm
Jonathan Billings wrote:
> I'm less concerned with firefox being broken on 32-bit CentOS 6
> systems when the platform is only going to live for another month.
> Frankly, I'm glad to see flash die just a little earlier.
It isn't just 32-bit, but also 64-bit, and it isn't just Flash, but
also
At Tue, 20 Oct 2020 12:56:38 -0400 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> Akemi Yagi wrote:
>
> > This issue?
> >
> > https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=17767
>
> This is a huge bug! Using Firefox to watch videos is a basic activity.
Even worse is that it is a failure for Google Voice and
On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 12:56:38PM -0400, Yves Bellefeuille wrote:
> Akemi Yagi wrote:
>
> > This issue?
> >
> > https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=17767
>
> This is a huge bug! Using Firefox to watch videos is a basic activity.
>
> The bug with grub2 a few months ago was even more serious:
Akemi Yagi wrote:
> This issue?
>
> https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=17767
This is a huge bug! Using Firefox to watch videos is a basic activity.
The bug with grub2 a few months ago was even more serious: it made
systems unbootable. It's discomfiting to see two major bugs so close
to each
On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 10:26:50PM -0500, Robert Nichols wrote:
> On 10/17/20 3:38 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
> > I did a yum update on my CentOS 6 laptop and it upgraded Firefox to 78, and
> > FF stopped seeing my mic and speakers. Is there some magic I need to do?
> > As
> > a short term (?)
On 10/17/20 3:38 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
I did a yum update on my CentOS 6 laptop and it upgraded Firefox to 78, and
FF stopped seeing my mic and speakers. Is there some magic I need to do? As
a short term (?) fix, I downgraded back to Firefox 68. My system is otherwise
up-to-date.
I'm
At Sat, 17 Oct 2020 19:08:49 -0500 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 3:38 PM Robert Heller wrote:
>
> > I did a yum update on my CentOS 6 laptop and it upgraded Firefox to 78,
> > and
> > FF stopped seeing my mic and speakers. Is there some magic I need to do?
> > As
>
At Sat, 17 Oct 2020 17:34:11 -0700 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 1:38 PM Robert Heller wrote:
>
> > I did a yum update on my CentOS 6 laptop and it upgraded Firefox to 78,
> > and
> > FF stopped seeing my mic and speakers. Is there some magic I need to do?
> > As
>
On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 1:38 PM Robert Heller wrote:
> I did a yum update on my CentOS 6 laptop and it upgraded Firefox to 78,
> and
> FF stopped seeing my mic and speakers. Is there some magic I need to do?
> As
> a short term (?) fix, I downgraded back to Firefox 68. My system is
> otherwise
On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 3:38 PM Robert Heller wrote:
> I did a yum update on my CentOS 6 laptop and it upgraded Firefox to 78,
> and
> FF stopped seeing my mic and speakers. Is there some magic I need to do?
> As
> a short term (?) fix, I downgraded back to Firefox 68. My system is
> otherwise
I did a yum update on my CentOS 6 laptop and it upgraded Firefox to 78, and
FF stopped seeing my mic and speakers. Is there some magic I need to do? As
a short term (?) fix, I downgraded back to Firefox 68. My system is otherwise
up-to-date.
--
Robert Heller -- Cell:
34 matches
Mail list logo
