On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Ray Van Dolson ra...@bludgeon.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:48:17AM -0400, Boris Epstein wrote:
Hi all,
If you have had experience hosting GFS/GFS2 on CentOS machines could
you share you general impression on it? Was it realiable? Fast? Any
issues
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 05:12:24PM -0400, Boris Epstein wrote:
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Ray Van Dolson ra...@bludgeon.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:48:17AM -0400, Boris Epstein wrote:
Hi all,
If you have had experience hosting GFS/GFS2 on CentOS machines could
you share
Nope, Red Hat backports the necessary bits from the newer kernels into
their 2.6.18 stable release, so you should be all set.
Ray
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
This is interesting...
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 05:36:42PM -0400, Boris Epstein wrote:
Nope, Red Hat backports the necessary bits from the newer kernels into
their 2.6.18 stable release, so you should be all set.
Ray
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Hi all,
If you have had experience hosting GFS/GFS2 on CentOS machines could
you share you general impression on it? Was it realiable? Fast? Any
issues or concerns?
Also, how feasible is it to start it on just one machine and then grow
it out if necessary?
Thanks.
Boris
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:48:17AM -0400, Boris Epstein wrote:
Hi all,
If you have had experience hosting GFS/GFS2 on CentOS machines could
you share you general impression on it? Was it realiable? Fast? Any
issues or concerns?
I've only run GFS2 on RHEL5. It's been quite reliable
6 matches
Mail list logo