[CentOS] I thought Y2K was over with?

2010-01-02 Thread Gilbert Sebenste
Apparently not. On a command line, type: date '+%G' First Spamassassin's bug (now fixed, type sa-update as user root), and now this... *** Gilbert Sebenste

Re: [CentOS] I thought Y2K was over with?

2010-01-02 Thread Benjamin Donnachie
2010/1/2 Gilbert Sebenste seben...@weather.admin.niu.edu: Apparently not. On a command line, type: date '+%G' Looks perfectly correct to me - from man strftime %Gis replaced by a year as a decimal number with century. This year is the one that contains the greater part of

Re: [CentOS] I thought Y2K was over with?

2010-01-02 Thread Gilbert Sebenste
On Sat, 2 Jan 2010, Benjamin Donnachie wrote: 2010/1/2 Gilbert Sebenste seben...@weather.admin.niu.edu: Apparently not. On a command line, type: date '+%G' Looks perfectly correct to me - from man strftime %Gis replaced by a year as a decimal number with century. This year

Re: [CentOS] I thought Y2K was over with?

2010-01-02 Thread Stephen Harris
On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 04:44:38PM -0600, Gilbert Sebenste wrote: Apparently not. On a command line, type: date '+%G' This is, I believe, correct. We're in ISO week 53 of year 2009 % date +%V %G -- %c 53 2009 -- Sat Jan 2 18:29:48 2010 % date +%V %G -- %c -d today + 1 day 53 2009 -- Sun