On 3/8/11, bedo bedo.w...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, i know ,you need ICS with XP ,you can see below:
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/using/networking/expert/crawford_02july01.mspx
2011/3/8 hadi motamedi motamed...@gmail.com
On 3/8/11, bedo bedo.w...@gmail.com wrote:
your topology is below?
Dear All
My centos machine is connected to my MS Windows machine on the net.The
MS Windows machine is connected to Internet via valid IP address
setting and on its secondary ip address setting it can see my centos
machine on the intranet.Can you please let me know how can try for
Internet
Dne 8.3.2011 10:19, hadi motamedi napsal(a):
Dear All
My centos machine is connected to my MS Windows machine on the net.The
MS Windows machine is connected to Internet via valid IP address
setting and on its secondary ip address setting it can see my centos
machine on the intranet.Can you
On 3/8/11, Jakub Jedelsky jakub.jedel...@gmail.com wrote:
Dne 8.3.2011 10:19, hadi motamedi napsal(a):
Dear All
My centos machine is connected to my MS Windows machine on the net.The
MS Windows machine is connected to Internet via valid IP address
setting and on its secondary ip address
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:09 PM, hadi motamedi motamed...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/8/11, Jakub Jedelsky jakub.jedel...@gmail.com wrote:
Dne 8.3.2011 10:19, hadi motamedi napsal(a):
Dear All
My centos machine is connected to my MS Windows machine on the net.The
MS Windows machine is connected to
On 3/8/11, Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:09 PM, hadi motamedi motamed...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/8/11, Jakub Jedelsky jakub.jedel...@gmail.com wrote:
Dne 8.3.2011 10:19, hadi motamedi napsal(a):
Dear All
My centos machine is connected to my MS Windows machine on
Dne 8.3.2011 11:27, hadi motamedi napsal(a):
On 3/8/11, Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:09 PM, hadi motamedi motamed...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/8/11, Jakub Jedelsky jakub.jedel...@gmail.com wrote:
Dne 8.3.2011 10:19, hadi motamedi napsal(a):
Dear All
My centos
Thank you very much for your reply.I am familiar with internet
connection sharing on MS Windows as I have a third XP client on the
same net connected to the internet.I tried as the following on my
centos:
#route add -net default gw 172.18.209.1
Where this is the secondary ip address of the
your topology is below?
centos xp---internet
then centos access internet via xp ?
2011/3/8 hadi motamedi motamed...@gmail.com
On 3/8/11, Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:09 PM, hadi motamedi motamed...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 3/8/11, Jakub Jedelsky
On 3/8/11, bedo bedo.w...@gmail.com wrote:
your topology is below?
centos xp---internet
then centos access internet via xp ?
2011/3/8 hadi motamedi motamed...@gmail.com
On 3/8/11, Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:09 PM, hadi motamedi
OK, i know ,you need ICS with XP ,you can see below:
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/using/networking/expert/crawford_02july01.mspx
2011/3/8 hadi motamedi motamed...@gmail.com
On 3/8/11, bedo bedo.w...@gmail.com wrote:
your topology is below?
centos xp---internet
then centos
My centos machine is connected to my MS Windows machine on the net.
The MS Windows machine is connected to Internet via valid IP address
setting and on its secondary ip address setting it can see my centos
machine on the intranet.
Connecting any windows based computer directly to the internet is
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 1:19 AM, hadi motamedi motamed...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear All
Can you please let me know how can try for
Internet connection sharing such that my centos machine can see
internet with minor modifications done?
I believe Steve Barnes has the right answer -- you need to
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 5:23 PM, Bart Schaefer barton.schae...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 1:19 AM, hadi motamedi motamed...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear All
Can you please let me know how can try for
Internet connection sharing such that my centos machine can see
internet with minor
On 03/08/11 7:01 AM, compdoc wrote:
Connecting any windows based computer directly to the internet is a really
really bad idea...
go away. it isn't 1998 anymore.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On 03/08/11 7:01 AM, compdoc wrote:
Connecting any windows based computer directly to the internet is a really
really bad idea...
go away. it isn't 1998 anymore.
That may be, but the advice is still valid, windows is infinitely more
vulnerable than *NIX on a direct/open connection. Most
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 8:59 PM, David Brian Chait dch...@invenda.com wrote:
On 03/08/11 7:01 AM, compdoc wrote:
Connecting any windows based computer directly to the internet is a really
really bad idea...
go away. it isn't 1998 anymore.
That may be, but the advice is still valid, windows
On 3/8/2011 12:53 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 03/08/11 7:01 AM, compdoc wrote:
Connecting any windows based computer directly to the internet is a really
really bad idea...
go away. it isn't 1998 anymore.
Still, consumer type NAT routers are really cheap, take little power,
and would
Do you have any proof of this? OR are you making assumptions of past
experiences? We have many Windows server on the net, directly with
very few hassles.
I have never had a *NIX server under my charge hacked, I have had several
Windows machines (those directly connected to the internet)
On 03/08/11 10:59 AM, David Brian Chait wrote:
That may be, but the advice is still valid, windows is infinitely more
vulnerable than *NIX on a direct/open connection. Most corps filter traffic
to windows boxes through intermediaries to limit risk.
Corps firewall their unix servers too.
On 03/08/11 11:09 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 3/8/2011 12:53 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 03/08/11 7:01 AM, compdoc wrote:
Connecting any windows based computer directly to the internet is a really
really bad idea...
go away. it isn't 1998 anymore.
Still, consumer type NAT routers are really
Windows since XP SP2 has had a perfectly decent firewall
built in and enabled by default.
Selinux is installed by default too, and usually the first thing that's
disabled when something isn't working, just as it is with windows users.
You are right about one thing: It's not 1998. It's a lot less
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 8:59 PM, David Brian Chait dch...@invenda.com
wrote:
On 03/08/11 7:01 AM, compdoc wrote:
Connecting any windows based computer directly to the internet is a
really really bad idea...
go away. it isn't 1998 anymore.
That may be, but the advice is
John R Pierce wrote:
On 03/08/11 10:59 AM, David Brian Chait wrote:
That may be, but the advice is still valid, windows is infinitely more
vulnerable than *NIX on a direct/open connection. Most corps filter
traffic to windows boxes through intermediaries to limit risk.
Corps firewall their
On 03/08/11 11:41 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
And I know of a major incident, the vector and targets being all Windows
systems. Sorry, I literally can't speak about how I know or more
details
duh. theres a lot more Windows systems out there than everything else
put together. of COURSE
compdoc wrote:
Windows since XP SP2 has had a perfectly decent firewall
built in and enabled by default.
Selinux is installed by default too, and usually the first thing that's
disabled when something isn't working, just as it is with windows users.
You are right about one thing: It's not
On 03/08/11 11:47 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Yup. Last time I saw a story about someone hanging an unprotected Windows
box on the 'Net, late last year, I think, it was down from 12 min to 5 min
before it was attacked.
and how long after you connect a 'nix box before worms start port
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 10:01 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 03/08/11 11:47 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Yup. Last time I saw a story about someone hanging an unprotected Windows
box on the 'Net, late last year, I think, it was down from 12 min to 5 min
before it was attacked.
John R Pierce wrote:
On 03/08/11 11:47 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Yup. Last time I saw a story about someone hanging an unprotected
Windows box on the 'Net, late last year, I think, it was down from 12
min to 5
min before it was attacked.
and how long after you connect a 'nix box before
And I know of a major incident, the vector and targets being all
Windows systems. Sorry, I literally can't speak about how I know
or more details
I've been removing java from the computers I service. It's not used much if
at all, and it's a vector.
On one workstation I monitor, the java
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 10:46 PM, compdoc comp...@hotrodpc.com wrote:
Google Chrome , or even Firefox are the way to go for visiting those
websites that no one admits to visiting...
Are you referring to website like http://www.microsoft.com and
http://technet.microsoft.com/? ;)
--
Kind
2011/3/8 John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com:
On 03/08/11 11:47 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Yup. Last time I saw a story about someone hanging an unprotected Windows
box on the 'Net, late last year, I think, it was down from 12 min to 5 min
before it was attacked.
and how long after you
32 matches
Mail list logo
