Re: [CentOS] Is bind-9.8.2-0.47.rc1.el6_8.1.x86_64 vulnerable

2016-10-17 Thread マスターズ　イアン
Folks Thanks for all the replies, especially the one with the rpm -q command in it (thanks Phil). I didn't know you could do that with rpm. Very useful indeed. Regards Ian ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] Is bind-9.8.2-0.47.rc1.el6_8.1.x86_64 vulnerable

2016-10-17 Thread Phil Wyett
On Mon, 2016-10-17 at 14:28 +0900, マスターズ　イアン wrote: > Hi > > I'd like to know if the present version of Bind in CentOS 6 > (bind-9.8.2-0.47.rc1.el6_8.1.x86_64) is vulerable to CVE-2016-2776. > > According to https://www.isc.org/downloads/, version 9.8.x is End-of-Life > (EOL) as of Sep 2014. >

Re: [CentOS] Is bind-9.8.2-0.47.rc1.el6_8.1.x86_64 vulnerable

2016-10-16 Thread John R Pierce
On 10/16/2016 10:28 PM, マスターズ　イアン wrote: I'd like to know if the present version of Bind in CentOS 6 (bind-9.8.2-0.47.rc1.el6_8.1.x86_64) is vulerable to CVE-2016-2776. According tohttps://www.isc.org/downloads/, version 9.8.x is End-of-Life (EOL) as of Sep 2014. Red Hat continues to

Re: [CentOS] Is bind-9.8.2-0.47.rc1.el6_8.1.x86_64 vulnerable

2016-10-16 Thread Eero Volotinen
https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2016-2776 check versions against centos package numbers :) -- Eero 2016-10-17 8:28 GMT+03:00 マスターズ イアン : > Hi > > I'd like to know if the present version of Bind in CentOS 6 > (bind-9.8.2-0.47.rc1.el6_8.1.x86_64) is vulerable to

[CentOS] Is bind-9.8.2-0.47.rc1.el6_8.1.x86_64 vulnerable

2016-10-16 Thread マスターズ　イアン
Hi I'd like to know if the present version of Bind in CentOS 6 (bind-9.8.2-0.47.rc1.el6_8.1.x86_64) is vulerable to CVE-2016-2776. According to https://www.isc.org/downloads/, version 9.8.x is End-of-Life (EOL) as of Sep 2014. Regards ian ___