I made the mistake of looking at disk IO numbers in two different ways --
now I'm confused, because they give inconsistent answers.
First way was using 'vmstat 10'. This gave me (apologies for wrapped lines):
r b swpd free buff cache si sobibo in cs us sy id
wa st
2 0
Greetings,
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 10:23 PM, David Dyer-Bennet d...@dd-b.net wrote:
I made the mistake of looking at disk IO numbers in two different ways --
now I'm confused, because they give inconsistent answers.
First way was using 'vmstat 10'. This gave me (apologies for wrapped lines):
On Mon, November 7, 2011 11:51, Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote:
Greetings,
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 10:23 PM, David Dyer-Bennet d...@dd-b.net wrote:
I made the mistake of looking at disk IO numbers in two different ways
--
now I'm confused, because they give inconsistent answers.
First way was
On Mon, November 7, 2011 13:23, Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote:
Greetings,
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 12:40 AM, David Dyer-Bennet d...@dd-b.net wrote:
On Mon, November 7, 2011 11:51, Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote:
Greetings,
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 10:23 PM, David Dyer-Bennet d...@dd-b.net
wrote:
Greetings,
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 1:13 AM, David Dyer-Bennet d...@dd-b.net wrote:
No, doesn't help.
Also, if you're claiming that the answers I get from monitor would be
correct, I'd like to understand why you think that set will be right in
preference to vmstat and snmp.
Or is it just
5 matches
Mail list logo
