On 08/12/13 18:16, Warren Young wrote:
> On 8/12/2013 12:54, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>
>> Well, *all* of these are rackmount servers, with no moving-the-server
>> wear.
>
> Our servers are all rack-mounted, too, and pretty much never get moved
> after being installed.
>
> In any case, I was referr
On 8/12/2013 12:54, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
> Well, *all* of these are rackmount servers, with no moving-the-server
> wear.
Our servers are all rack-mounted, too, and pretty much never get moved
after being installed.
In any case, I was referring to wear in the electromechanical components
of
On Aug 12, 2013, at 16:17, Glenn Eychaner wrote:
> I didn't even know that the Optiplex 7010 was CentOS compatible (though
> someone may have mentioned it in my previous thread); it is not on the
> RedHat Hardware List, not does Dell's web site go out of its way to mention
> it. Again, how does o
> > Since the reqirements are (relatively) modest (except those two), I was
> > hoping to squeeze something in.
>
> how about an ultrasmall form factor desktop, such as the Dell Optiplex
> 7010 USFF ? those have dual displayport outputs (requires $7 optional
> video output panel), and are 24x6
On Aug 12, 2013 1:57 PM, "Ljubomir Ljubojevic" wrote:
>
> On 08/12/2013 07:30 PM, Glenn Eychaner wrote:
> > Since the reqirements are (relatively) modest (except those two), I was
> > hoping to squeeze something in.
> >
> > Looks like I'm out of luck, and buying another full tower to hold a
> > mo
On 12.08.2013 20:42, Warren Young wrote:
> On 8/12/2013 11:01, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> VERY STRONG RECOMMENDATION: DON'T buy Supermicro. They have a *lot* of
>> trouble with this new, fuzzy concept called "quality control".
>
> We have a *lot* of SuperMicro based systems in the field, and they
>
Warren Young wrote:
> On 8/12/2013 11:01, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> VERY STRONG RECOMMENDATION: DON'T buy Supermicro. They have a *lot* of
>> trouble with this new, fuzzy concept called "quality control".
>
> We have a *lot* of SuperMicro based systems in the field, and they
> aren't failing. In
Glenn Eychaner wrote:
> m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote:
>> Now, about what you're looking to build - you say that you want 1U, and
>> mention rackspace: in my experience, rackmounts are a *lot* larger than
>> a pizza box, so I'm a little confused at the requirements you're building
>> for.
>
> The rack
On 8/12/2013 11:01, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> VERY STRONG RECOMMENDATION: DON'T buy Supermicro. They have a *lot* of
> trouble with this new, fuzzy concept called "quality control".
We have a *lot* of SuperMicro based systems in the field, and they
aren't failing. In fact, I can't remember the l
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Glenn Eychaner wrote:
[snip]
> Third (more general) question: My requirements are (I believe) modest:
> * 1U short-depth rackmount chassis OR Mini-ITX small-footprint chassis
> * Dual GbE network ports
> * Dual 1920x1200 monitor display
> * One SSD drive
> * 32-bi
On Aug 12, 2013, at 14:01, John R Pierce wrote:
> how about an ultrasmall form factor desktop, such as the Dell Optiplex
> 7010 USFF ? those have dual displayport outputs (requires $7 optional
> video output panel), and are 24x6.5x24cm
I was going to recommend the Optiplex 7010 as well. I ru
On 8/12/2013 10:30 AM, Glenn Eychaner wrote:
>
> Since the reqirements are (relatively) modest (except those two), I was
> hoping to squeeze something in.
>
> Looks like I'm out of luck, and buying another full tower to hold a
> motherboard, a disk drive, and one expansion card.
how about an ul
On 08/12/2013 01:22 PM, Glenn Eychaner wrote:
> m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote:
>> Now, about what you're looking to build - you say that you want 1U, and
>> mention rackspace: in my experience, rackmounts are a *lot* larger than a
>> pizza box, so I'm a little confused at the requirements you're buildi
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Glenn Eychaner wrote:
>
> Since the reqirements are (relatively) modest (except those two), I was
> hoping to squeeze something in.
>
> Looks like I'm out of luck, and buying another full tower to hold a
> motherboard, a disk drive, and one expansion card.
Depend
On 08/12/2013 07:30 PM, Glenn Eychaner wrote:
> Since the reqirements are (relatively) modest (except those two), I was
> hoping to squeeze something in.
>
> Looks like I'm out of luck, and buying another full tower to hold a
> motherboard, a disk drive, and one expansion card.
>
Have you consider
John R Pierce wrote:
> On 8/12/2013 9:14 AM, Glenn Eychaner wrote:
> > * 1U short-depth rackmount chassis OR Mini-ITX small-footprint chassis
> > * Dual 1920x1200 monitor display
>
> those two requirements together are unusual. most rackmount 1U systems
> are headless, except a basic VGA for ini
m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote:
> Now, about what you're looking to build - you say that you want 1U, and
> mention rackspace: in my experience, rackmounts are a *lot* larger than a
> pizza box, so I'm a little confused at the requirements you're building
> for.
The rack is already full; I only get tha
On 8/12/2013 9:14 AM, Glenn Eychaner wrote:
> * 1U short-depth rackmount chassis OR Mini-ITX small-footprint chassis
> ...
> * Dual 1920x1200 monitor display
those two requirements together are unusual. most rackmount 1U systems
are headless, except a basic VGA for initial configuration.
dual d
Glenn Eychaner wrote:
> So, having returned from a month's vacation, I'm back to work on
> attempting to build a set of small form factor CentOS compatible
computers. I've
> really tried to do my homework, but this doesn't appear (at first glance)
> to be at all easy. It's not made easier by the fa
So, having returned from a month's vacation, I'm back to work on attempting
to build a set of small form factor CentOS compatible computers. I've
really tried to do my homework, but this doesn't appear (at first glance)
to be at all easy. It's not made easier by the fact that I have to get it
right
20 matches
Mail list logo
