On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Emmanuel Noobadmin
centos.ad...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/29/11, Lucian luc...@lastdot.org wrote:
Something seems out of order with the above; may I ask what exactly
you are trying to achieve?
Unless I read it all wrong you want (i.e.) x.x.x.2 on br0 and also on
Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote on Sat, 30 Apr 2011 03:54:01 +0800:
if they are accessible via the Internet, then it means it wasn't
necessary to add any IP to a bridge.
FYI: the IP addresses of host and guest don't have to be in the same
subnet, e.g. your host may have a private, non-routable IP
Is it possible to assign multiple IP addresses to a bridge the same
way ethernet devices can?
The purpose is to accept incoming traffic for multiple public IP.
1 Physical NIC
- br0 (accepts incoming traffic for x.x.x.2 to x.x.x.5)
Then 3 different virtual interfaces are connected to this bridge
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Emmanuel Noobadmin
centos.ad...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it possible to assign multiple IP addresses to a bridge the same
way ethernet devices can?
Yes, I think you can even define whole ranges of addresses.
The purpose is to accept incoming traffic for multiple
On 4/29/11, Lucian luc...@lastdot.org wrote:
Something seems out of order with the above; may I ask what exactly
you are trying to achieve?
Unless I read it all wrong you want (i.e.) x.x.x.2 on br0 and also on
eth0? This cannot work.
Well, I have a physical connected to the ISP modem/router
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Emmanuel Noobadmin
centos.ad...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/29/11, Lucian luc...@lastdot.org wrote:
Something seems out of order with the above; may I ask what exactly
you are trying to achieve?
Unless I read it all wrong you want (i.e.) x.x.x.2 on br0 and also on
Lucian wrote:
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Emmanuel Noobadmin
centos.ad...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/29/11, Lucian luc...@lastdot.org wrote:
Something seems out of order with the above; may I ask what exactly
you are trying to achieve?
Unless I read it all wrong you want (i.e.) x.x.x.2 on
On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 18:51:50 +0800
Emmanuel Noobadmin centos.ad...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/29/11, Lucian luc...@lastdot.org wrote:
Something seems out of order with the above; may I ask what exactly
you are trying to achieve?
Unless I read it all wrong you want (i.e.) x.x.x.2 on br0 and also
Benjamin Hackl wrote on Fri, 29 Apr 2011 13:51:13 +0200:
Just assign IP1 to eth0, IP2 to eth0:1, IP3 to eth0:2 and so on.
and if you really need a bridge you attach those to the bridge: br0,
br0:1, br0:2 etc. eth0 ist the *physical* interface for the bridge.
Kai
On 4/29/11, Lucian luc...@lastdot.org wrote
So .2 works as main IP and .3 does not?
Is your ISP doing any MAC address filtering? You may need to use a
routed bridge then..
It turns out that I was barking up the wrong tree and chasing red herrings.
The virtualized guest definition was off by
10 matches
Mail list logo
