I understood when Stephen said Don't trust nessus scans as I had also
mentioned in thi thread. Just that someone also mentioned in this thread
that Nessus should not in general be ignored. Simply wanted to double
check that before arriving at a conclusion.
Thanks
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 2:24
nessus also supports local checks on centos for patch levels?
On Aug 11, 2013 3:04 PM, Anumeha Prasad anumeha.pra...@gmail.com wrote:
I understood when Stephen said Don't trust nessus scans as I had also
mentioned in thi thread. Just that someone also mentioned in this thread
that Nessus
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Openssl vulnerability - SSL/ TLS Renegotion
Handshakes
Thank You.
Support for RFC 5746 in OpenSSL was introduced upstream in version
0.9.8m
mentioned in the Redhat article made me think that I would require
this
version. Stephen, as per what you explained, I
Am 08.08.2013 09:04, schrieb Anumeha Prasad:
Thanks for the update.
I'd updated most of my rpms to CentOS 5.9. I'd even updated openssl
to openssl-0.9.8e-22.el5_8.4 (though now the latest is version
is openssl-0.9.8e-26.el5_9.1). My concern is that even upgrading openssl to
version
Hi,
I'm currently at CentOS 5.8. I'm using openssl version
openssl-0.9.8e-22.el5. The following vulnerability was reported by a Nessus
security scan:
SSL/ TLS Renegotion Handshakes MiTm Plaintext Data Injection
As per following link, Redhat has introduced openssl-0.9.8m which fixes
this
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 04:01:12PM +0530, Anumeha Prasad wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently at CentOS 5.8. I'm using openssl version
Current is 5.9. Update.
openssl-0.9.8e-22.el5. The following vulnerability was reported by a Nessus
Current openssl is 0.9.8e-26. Again update.
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 04:01:12PM +0530, Anumeha Prasad wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently at CentOS 5.8. I'm using openssl version
openssl-0.9.8e-22.el5. The following vulnerability was reported by a Nessus
security scan:
Don't trust Nessus scans
As per following link, Redhat has introduced
Thank You.
Support for RFC 5746 in OpenSSL was introduced upstream in version 0.9.8m
mentioned in the Redhat article made me think that I would require this
version. Stephen, as per what you explained, I should be fine with
openssl-0.9.8e-22.el5.
Right? So, can the vulnerability reported by
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Openssl vulnerability - SSL/ TLS Renegotion
Handshakes
Thank You.
Support for RFC 5746 in OpenSSL was introduced upstream in version
0.9.8m
mentioned in the Redhat article made me think that I would require
this
version. Stephen, as per what you
9 matches
Mail list logo