On Thu, 25 Aug 2011, Paul Heinlein wrote:
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011, John Hodrien wrote:
This is a known bug of CentOS 6.0. Redo the install without
including the updates repo in your kickstart file, and you'll find
it installs fine.
Odd. I've had no trouble doing kickstarts with the updates
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011, John Hodrien wrote:
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011, Paul Heinlein wrote:
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011, John Hodrien wrote:
This is a known bug of CentOS 6.0. Redo the install without
including the updates repo in your kickstart file, and you'll find
it installs fine.
Odd. I've had no
Hi listers
i tried to kickstart-install CentOS 6.0 64 in a Virtualbox (Virtualbox
Version 4.12). I used a local CDROM with the net-install ISO on it to
boot from. The ISO distribution file was provided on a server in the LAN
as was the kickstart file.
When starting the installation i aded the
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011, anax wrote:
Hi listers
i tried to kickstart-install CentOS 6.0 64 in a Virtualbox (Virtualbox
Version 4.12). I used a local CDROM with the net-install ISO on it to
boot from. The ISO distribution file was provided on a server in the LAN
as was the kickstart file.
When
From: anax a...@ayni.com
binary /usr/bin/fusermount. This binary was installed without execute
permission for everybody, so it could be invoked only by the userid root
and members of the group fuse, which is not, what i had expected.
Same permissions as with CentOS 5...
# ll
Hi John
thanks for the immediate information.
suomi
On 2011-08-25 11:51, John Hodrien wrote:
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011, anax wrote:
Hi listers
i tried to kickstart-install CentOS 6.0 64 in a Virtualbox (Virtualbox
Version 4.12). I used a local CDROM with the net-install ISO on it to
boot from.
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011, John Hodrien wrote:
This is a known bug of CentOS 6.0. Redo the install without
including the updates repo in your kickstart file, and you'll find
it installs fine.
Odd. I've had no trouble doing kickstarts with the updates repo
specified in the kickstart
7 matches
Mail list logo
