Re: [CentOS] Re: CentOS 5.2 is here!

2008-06-25 Thread William L. Maltby
On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 18:09 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote: On 6/23/08, Timothy Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip Orlando, FL. The move from Firefox 1.5 to 3.0 should be a big improvement for those of us who are Desktop users. Be aware that the FF beta version RH released will not

[CentOS] Re: CentOS 5.2 is here!

2008-06-25 Thread Timothy Murphy
Jun Salen wrote: I like to keep reasonably up-to-date with distributions I am running, so would like to update to Centos-5.2 as and when it is released. you will be up to date simply by running 'yum update' When 5.2 is released, those updates will be installed For the record, I

[CentOS] Re: CentOS 5.2 is here!

2008-06-24 Thread centos
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 10:41:37 -0500 Johnny Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: CentOS-5.0, CentOS-5.1 and CentOS-5.2 are update sets of CentOS-5 ... and are still CentOS-5. The .0, .1, and .2 are update sets and are really just a frozen point in time of CentOS-5. I think that the problem is the

Re: [CentOS] Re: CentOS 5.2 is here!

2008-06-24 Thread Ralph Angenendt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 10:41:37 -0500 Johnny Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: CentOS-5.0, CentOS-5.1 and CentOS-5.2 are update sets of CentOS-5 ... and are still CentOS-5. The .0, .1, and .2 are update sets and are really just a frozen point in time of CentOS-5.

Re: [CentOS] Re: CentOS 5.2 is here!

2008-06-24 Thread Johnny Hughes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 10:41:37 -0500 Johnny Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: CentOS-5.0, CentOS-5.1 and CentOS-5.2 are update sets of CentOS-5 ... and are still CentOS-5. The .0, .1, and .2 are update sets and are really just a frozen point in time of CentOS-5. I think

Re: [CentOS] Re: CentOS 5.2 is here!

2008-06-24 Thread Lanny Marcus
On 6/23/08, Timothy Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: William L. Maltby wrote: And I add my thanks too, to the whole CentOS crew. I'm running Centos-5.1 but am a complete Centos newbie. What is the best way of installing Centos-5.2 ? Is a fresh installation recommended, or can one do a yum

[CentOS] Re: CentOS 5.2 is here!

2008-06-24 Thread Jun Salen
Message: 76 Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 13:37:17 +0100 From: Timothy Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [CentOS] Re: Re: Re: CentOS 5.2 is here! To: centos@centos.org Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Timothy Murphy wrote: I like to keep reasonably up-to-date

[CentOS] Re: CentOS 5.2 is here!

2008-06-23 Thread Timothy Murphy
William L. Maltby wrote: And I add my thanks too, to the whole CentOS crew. I'm running Centos-5.1 but am a complete Centos newbie. What is the best way of installing Centos-5.2 ? Is a fresh installation recommended, or can one do a yum upgrade? Or is there any other way of proceeding?

Re: [CentOS] Re: CentOS 5.2 is here!

2008-06-23 Thread Rudi Ahlers
Timothy Murphy wrote: William L. Maltby wrote: And I add my thanks too, to the whole CentOS crew. I'm running Centos-5.1 but am a complete Centos newbie. What is the best way of installing Centos-5.2 ? Is a fresh installation recommended, or can one do a yum upgrade? Or is there any