Am Sonntag, den 09.12.2007, 18:04 +0100 schrieb Dag Wieers:
...
I understand CentOS's position to simplify user-related issues, but the
use of 3rd party software on top of CentOS is as much a CentOS user
problem as it is a 3rd party software problem in most cases. Users should
be able to
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007, Johnny Hughes wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
There is a distribution-related issue here whether you care to
acknowledge it or not - and the solution isn't going to be to wait until
the whole world decides on only one version of everything. Incompatible
repositories
Les Mikesell wrote:
Karanbir Singh wrote:
I have repeatedly asked people to take this conversation away from
this list. Is there really any point you are trying to make by
carrying on ?
its not that hard to just post a follow up on another list, both you
and rex are on the epel and the
Dag Wieers wrote:
Besides I did not start this thread, and many others have replied after
your post as well. But if you had to pick on my to make an example or as a
political statement, I don't mind being the stooge (just tell me in
advance).
i guess you havent read the full thread yet.
--
On Fri, 7 Dec 2007, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Dag Wieers wrote:
Targetted for Fedora Core 9 ?
Nothing can replace the simplicity and ease of a repotag, which is a
solution that works today on EL2, EL3, EL4 and EL5. Any other solution
discussed over the last year does not exist and is
Karanbir Singh wrote:
I have repeatedly asked people to take this conversation away from this
list. Is there really any point you are trying to make by carrying on ?
its not that hard to just post a follow up on another list, both you and
rex are on the epel and the rpmforge lists. how
Les Mikesell wrote:
Rex Dieter wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
How does a user identify packages that have come from this repository in
order to fix or control any incompatibilities?
rpm -qi name_of_package
Look for Vendor and/or Packager tag.
Is there some reason to expect a
7 matches
Mail list logo
