Paul Norton wrote:
Scott Silva wrote:
I don't even have any hits in my logs on that date, and I rechecked my
filters.
I have Centos 4 in i686 and x86_64 and CentOS 5 in the same arches.
Maybe it only fell under the General CentOS 4 filter and didn't trickle
out to the individual arches.
on 9-16-2008 8:21 AM Joe Pruett spake the following:
i (and others) have missed messages on centos-devel as well. did other
people not see the 4.7 announcement message? i'm wondering if the
centos list server is having some kind of issue.
I didn't see one either. Maybe it wasn't announced
Scott Silva wrote:
on 9-16-2008 8:21 AM Joe Pruett spake the following:
i (and others) have missed messages on centos-devel as well. did
other people not see the 4.7 announcement message? i'm wondering if
the centos list server is having some kind of issue.
I didn't see one either. Maybe
Scott Silva wrote:
on 9-16-2008 8:21 AM Joe Pruett spake the following:
i (and others) have missed messages on centos-devel as well. did other
people not see the 4.7 announcement message? i'm wondering if the
centos list server is having some kind of issue.
I didn't see one either.
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 09:53 -0700, Scott Silva wrote:
on 9-16-2008 8:21 AM Joe Pruett spake the following:
i (and others) have missed messages on centos-devel as well. did other
people not see the 4.7 announcement message? i'm wondering if the
centos list server is having some kind of
on 9-16-2008 10:03 AM Greg Bailey spake the following:
Scott Silva wrote:
on 9-16-2008 8:21 AM Joe Pruett spake the following:
i (and others) have missed messages on centos-devel as well. did
other people not see the 4.7 announcement message? i'm wondering if
the centos list server is
Here it is:
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2008-September/064540.html
Scroll down to message 5.
HTH,
Filipe
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 15:46 -0400, William L. Maltby wrote:
snip
Thinking about it, I tend too watch for the point releases in there own
s/there/their/
announcements. Bad habit I guess.
snip
--
Bill
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
William L. Maltby wrote:
+1 And I have no filters and do get all the other anounce stuff. FWIW, I
never did get the 4.6 either.
Are you sure that you have *no* filters in place at
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/options/centos-announce? Do you really get
*every*
announcement, even for CentOS
on 9-16-2008 12:32 PM Filipe Brandenburger spake the following:
Here it is:
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2008-September/064540.html
Scroll down to message 5.
HTH,
Filipe
So I retract my maybe it wasn't announced. But not my I didn't get it.
Nothing in my mail logs either except
Scott Silva wrote:
So I retract my maybe it wasn't announced. But not my I didn't get it.
Nothing in my mail logs either except the announcement on Aug. 30 and the
Announcements (8) on the 15th.
Which mail address? The one you use here didn't get any mails on sunday.
Ralph
However, another post implies a possible oversight on my part. He
mentions entry # 5 in an announcement. Being an (a?)typical hoomon, I
could've scrolled by too quickly and missed them. *sigh*. The ultimate
CPE problem.
Thinking about it, I tend too watch for the point releases in there own
on 9-16-2008 1:23 PM Ralph Angenendt spake the following:
Scott Silva wrote:
So I retract my maybe it wasn't announced. But not my I didn't get it.
Nothing in my mail logs either except the announcement on Aug. 30 and the
Announcements (8) on the 15th.
Which mail address? The one you use
Scott Silva wrote:
I don't even have any hits in my logs on that date, and I rechecked my
filters.
I have Centos 4 in i686 and x86_64 and CentOS 5 in the same arches.
Maybe it only fell under the General CentOS 4 filter and didn't trickle
out to the individual arches.
That's exactly what
from looking at the regexs for the subscriptions, i can see that the
announcement would not be caught by any of the arch specific
subscriptions. so that explains why i (and probably others) didn't see
it. mystery solved.
___
CentOS mailing list
on 9-16-2008 3:42 PM Joe Pruett spake the following:
from looking at the regexs for the subscriptions, i can see that the
announcement would not be caught by any of the arch specific
subscriptions. so that explains why i (and probably others) didn't see
it. mystery solved.
I also assume
Scott Silva wrote:
I don't even have any hits in my logs on that date, and I rechecked my
filters.
I have Centos 4 in i686 and x86_64 and CentOS 5 in the same arches.
Maybe it only fell under the General CentOS 4 filter and didn't trickle
out to the individual arches.
You're not alone.
I
17 matches
Mail list logo
