Scott Silva wrote:
I'm curious as to why 2 complete dd'd copies don't pair at boot. One
comes up running and it does work to mdadm --add the partner
partitions and after the resync they do automatically pair at boot.
Are they dd copies of the different nodes (IE.. dd copy of sda paired
on 6-11-2008 11:36 PM Les Mikesell spake the following:
Scott Silva wrote:
I'm curious as to why 2 complete dd'd copies don't pair at boot. One
comes up running and it does work to mdadm --add the partner
partitions and after the resync they do automatically pair at boot.
Are they dd
Scott Silva wrote:
I'm curious as to why 2 complete dd'd copies don't pair at boot.
One comes up running and it does work to mdadm --add the partner
partitions and after the resync they do automatically pair at boot.
Are they dd copies of the different nodes (IE.. dd copy of sda paired
on 6-12-2008 10:28 AM Les Mikesell spake the following:
Scott Silva wrote:
I'm curious as to why 2 complete dd'd copies don't pair at boot.
One comes up running and it does work to mdadm --add the partner
partitions and after the resync they do automatically pair at boot.
Are they dd
Scott Silva wrote:
I'm curious as to why 2 complete dd'd copies don't pair at boot.
One comes up running and it does work to mdadm --add the partner
partitions and after the resync they do automatically pair at boot.
Are they dd copies of the different nodes (IE.. dd copy of sda
paired
Les Mikesell wrote:
You can't beat dd for getting everything exactly the same regardless of
what you changed - or just splitting the mirrors and letting each sync
to new partners but then you have to reinstall grub. I prefer
clonezilla for non-raid configurations but most of the machines
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
You can't beat dd for getting everything exactly the same regardless of
what you changed - or just splitting the mirrors and letting each sync
to new partners but then you have to reinstall grub. I prefer
clonezilla for non-raid configurations but most of the
On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 15:14 -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
You can't beat dd for getting everything exactly the same regardless of
what you changed - or just splitting the mirrors and letting each sync
to new partners but then you have to reinstall grub. I prefer
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
If you have a disk with several partitions set up as members of a
raid1 md devices, can you make a dd image of that disk to replace its
matching drive with identical partitions or are there differences
between the mirrored partitions?
you can 'dd' the MBR and then
Les Mikesell wrote:
snip
'mdadm' writes a listing of the devices in the array to the md
superblock and orders them by number,major,minor. You cannot add
another device to the array with the same tuple.
Isn't this updated at detect time so the device minor's
should always be
on 6-10-2008 9:59 AM Ross S. W. Walker spake the following:
Les Mikesell wrote:
If you have a disk with several partitions set up as members of a raid1
md devices, can you make a dd image of that disk to replace its matching
drive with identical partitions or are there differences between the
Scott Silva wrote:
If you have a disk with several partitions set up as members of a
raid1 md devices, can you make a dd image of that disk to replace its
matching drive with identical partitions or are there differences
between the mirrored partitions?
you can 'dd' the MBR and then re-add
Les Mikesell wrote:
Scott Silva wrote:
If you have a disk with several partitions set up as members of a
raid1 md devices, can you make a dd image of that disk to replace its
matching drive with identical partitions or are there differences
between the mirrored partitions?
you
13 matches
Mail list logo
