[CentOS] ReiserFS - status?

2013-05-21 Thread Rafał Radecki
Hi All. What is the status of ReiserFS in CentOS at the moment? I have some servers which use it as a loadable kernel module. I am thinking about a filesystem for database systems and would like to know if ReiserFS will be maintained in CentOS/Linux kernel in the future? Best regards, Rafal.

Re: [CentOS] ReiserFS - status?

2013-05-21 Thread Rainer Duffner
Am Tue, 21 May 2013 14:11:31 +0200 schrieb Rafał Radecki radecki.ra...@gmail.com: Hi All. What is the status of ReiserFS in CentOS at the moment? I have some servers which use it as a loadable kernel module. I am thinking about a filesystem for database systems and would like to know if

Re: [CentOS] ReiserFS - status?

2013-05-21 Thread Woehrle Hartmut SBB CFF FFS (Extern)
Hi All. What is the status of ReiserFS in CentOS at the moment? I have some servers which use it as a loadable kernel module. I am thinking about a filesystem for database systems and would like to know if ReiserFS will be maintained in CentOS/Linux kernel in the future? Since Hans Reiser will

Re: [CentOS] ReiserFS - status?

2013-05-21 Thread Yves S. Garret
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Woehrle Hartmut SBB CFF FFS (Extern) hartmut.woeh...@sbb.ch wrote: Hi All. What is the status of ReiserFS in CentOS at the moment? I have some servers which use it as a loadable kernel module. I am thinking about a filesystem for database systems and would

Re: [CentOS] ReiserFS - status?

2013-05-21 Thread John R Pierce
On 5/21/2013 5:55 AM, Yves S. Garret wrote: http://www.serverfocus.org/reiserfs-vs-ext4-vs-xfs-vs-zfs-vs-btrfs ... In the above link you can find comparisons between the various file systems, their advantages and disadvantages. Perhaps you can find something more contemporary that can help

Re: [CentOS] ReiserFS

2008-01-28 Thread Bill Campbell
On Sun, Jan 27, 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Is their any gotcha when using ResiserFs as a file system? We used reiserfs for a while on SuSE systems thinking that it would be OK because it was the default. Unfortunately I have had several occassions where we had massive data loss with

Re: [CentOS] ReiserFS

2008-01-28 Thread Daniel de Kok
On 1/28/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is their any gotcha when using ResiserFs as a file system? Aside from not being supported by the CentOS kernels in base/updates, I would recommend against it. No major distributor seems to put development effort into reiserfs anymore and I

Re: [CentOS] ReiserFS

2008-01-28 Thread William L. Maltby
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 00:03 -0800, Bill Campbell wrote: snip Bill -- INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC URL: http://www.celestial.com/ PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way FAX:(206) 232-9186 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676 DOS: n., A

Re: [CentOS] ReiserFS

2008-01-28 Thread Chris Mauritz
Bill Campbell wrote: On Sun, Jan 27, 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Is their any gotcha when using ResiserFs as a file system? We used reiserfs for a while on SuSE systems thinking that it would be OK because it was the default. Unfortunately I have had several occassions where we had

[CentOS] ReiserFS

2008-01-27 Thread centos
Hi, Is their any gotcha when using ResiserFs as a file system? -- Thanks http://www.911networks.com When the network has to work ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] ReiserFS

2008-01-27 Thread John R Pierce
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Is their any gotcha when using ResiserFs as a file system? other than not being supported by standard CentOS kernels? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos