Hi All.
What is the status of ReiserFS in CentOS at the moment? I have some servers
which use it as a loadable kernel module. I am thinking about a filesystem
for database systems and would like to know if ReiserFS will be maintained
in CentOS/Linux kernel in the future?
Best regards,
Rafal.
Am Tue, 21 May 2013 14:11:31 +0200
schrieb Rafał Radecki radecki.ra...@gmail.com:
Hi All.
What is the status of ReiserFS in CentOS at the moment? I have some
servers which use it as a loadable kernel module. I am thinking about
a filesystem for database systems and would like to know if
Hi All.
What is the status of ReiserFS in CentOS at the moment? I have some servers
which use it as a loadable kernel module. I am thinking about a filesystem for
database systems and would like to know if ReiserFS will be maintained in
CentOS/Linux kernel in the future?
Since Hans Reiser will
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Woehrle Hartmut SBB CFF FFS (Extern)
hartmut.woeh...@sbb.ch wrote:
Hi All.
What is the status of ReiserFS in CentOS at the moment? I have some
servers which use it as a loadable kernel module. I am thinking about a
filesystem for database systems and would
On 5/21/2013 5:55 AM, Yves S. Garret wrote:
http://www.serverfocus.org/reiserfs-vs-ext4-vs-xfs-vs-zfs-vs-btrfs
...
In the above link you can find comparisons between the various file systems,
their advantages and disadvantages. Perhaps you can find something more
contemporary that can help
On Sun, Jan 27, 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Is their any gotcha when using ResiserFs as a file system?
We used reiserfs for a while on SuSE systems thinking that it
would be OK because it was the default. Unfortunately I have had
several occassions where we had massive data loss with
On 1/28/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is their any gotcha when using ResiserFs as a file system?
Aside from not being supported by the CentOS kernels in base/updates,
I would recommend against it. No major distributor seems to put
development effort into reiserfs anymore and I
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 00:03 -0800, Bill Campbell wrote:
snip
Bill
--
INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC
URL: http://www.celestial.com/ PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way
FAX:(206) 232-9186 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676
DOS: n., A
Bill Campbell wrote:
On Sun, Jan 27, 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Is their any gotcha when using ResiserFs as a file system?
We used reiserfs for a while on SuSE systems thinking that it
would be OK because it was the default. Unfortunately I have had
several occassions where we had
Hi,
Is their any gotcha when using ResiserFs as a file system?
--
Thanks
http://www.911networks.com
When the network has to work
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Is their any gotcha when using ResiserFs as a file system?
other than not being supported by standard CentOS kernels?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
11 matches
Mail list logo