I have chased up SFTP since then. Thank you.
> On Sep 6, 2018, at 12:42 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
>> I wouldn't recommend Samba for this use case. The way it does permissions
> is like it's been grafted on from a Windows world. Fine for NAS stuff. But
> for editing system files, is look
>
>
> I wouldn't recommend Samba for this use case. The way it does permissions
is like it's been grafted on from a Windows world. Fine for NAS stuff. But
for editing system files, is look into an SFTP or SSH GUI client for macOS.
Also, SELinux requires dirs/files labeled with samba_share_t which
OK, got it working somewhat. I can see files and get them open in my text
editor on my workstation.
Do these services offer read/write abilities on remote workstations?
> On Sep 2, 2018, at 3:59 PM, Bee.Lists wrote:
>
> For some reason my smb.conf tests just fine, but it isn’t showing
Hi folks.
For some reason my smb.conf tests just fine, but it isn’t showing up at my Mac.
The box is showing, but I can’t see anything. It gives me an error as well.
All is below.
https://www.unixmen.com/install-configure-samba-server-centos-7/ is the setup
I’m trying.
The smb.conf:
On Tue, 3 Jul 2018, mark wrote:
m...@tdiehl.org wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jun 2018, mark wrote:
Walter H. wrote:
On 28.06.2018 16:30, mark wrote:
Just ran into a problem: someone with a new laptop, running Win 10,
version 1709, tried to map their home directory (served from a
CentOS 6.9
box, and
m...@tdiehl.org wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jun 2018, mark wrote:
>> Walter H. wrote:
>>> On 28.06.2018 16:30, mark wrote:
>>>
Just ran into a problem: someone with a new laptop, running Win 10,
version 1709, tried to map their home directory (served from a
CentOS 6.9
box, and it
On Thu, 28 Jun 2018, mark wrote:
Walter H. wrote:
On 28.06.2018 16:30, mark wrote:
Just ran into a problem: someone with a new laptop, running Win 10,
version 1709, tried to map their home directory (served from a CentOS 6.9
box, and it fails, with Windows complaining that it no longer
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 06:55:21PM -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 06/28/2018 07:30 AM, mark wrote:
> >Just ran into a problem: someone with a new laptop, running Win 10,
> >version 1709, tried to map their home directory (served from a CentOS
> >6.9 box, and it fails, with Windows
On 06/28/2018 07:30 AM, mark wrote:
Just ran into a problem: someone with a new laptop, running Win 10,
version 1709, tried to map their home directory (served from a CentOS
6.9 box, and it fails, with Windows complaining that it no longer
supports SMBv1, and if you go to their site, you can
On 28.06.2018 16:30, mark wrote:
>Just ran into a problem: someone with a new laptop, running Win 10,
> version 1709, tried to map their home directory (served from a CentOS
> 6.9 box, and it fails, with Windows complaining that it no longer
> supports SMBv1, and if you go to their site, you
On 28/06/18 15:30, mark wrote:
Hi, folks,
Just ran into a problem: someone with a new laptop, running Win 10,
version 1709, tried to map their home directory (served from a CentOS
6.9 box, and it fails, with Windows complaining that it no longer
supports SMBv1, and if you go to their site,
Walter H. wrote:
> On 28.06.2018 16:30, mark wrote:
>
>> Just ran into a problem: someone with a new laptop, running Win 10,
>> version 1709, tried to map their home directory (served from a CentOS 6.9
>> box, and it fails, with Windows complaining that it no longer supports
>> SMBv1, and if you
On 28.06.2018 16:30, mark wrote:
Hi, folks,
Just ran into a problem: someone with a new laptop, running Win 10,
version 1709, tried to map their home directory (served from a CentOS
6.9 box, and it fails, with Windows complaining that it no longer
supports SMBv1, and if you go to their
Hi, folks,
Just ran into a problem: someone with a new laptop, running Win 10,
version 1709, tried to map their home directory (served from a CentOS
6.9 box, and it fails, with Windows complaining that it no longer
supports SMBv1, and if you go to their site, you can install support
for that
14 matches
Mail list logo
