Re: [CentOS] Samba use sendfile configuration option set do disabled as default - why?

2009-08-25 Thread happymaster23
No, I have not any problem. With use sendfile = yes it works great. My question is, why is this configuration option set to be off in CentOS? You know - when I want to read something about oplocks (advantages disadvantages) it was very easy - there are tons of documentation. When I want to read

Re: [CentOS] Samba use sendfile configuration option set do disabled as default - why?

2009-08-25 Thread Rick Barnes
happymaster23 wrote: My question is why is this option disabled as default in CentOS? I believe you are not getting the answer you seek because you are not asking the right question to the right people. The right question is Why is this option disabled as default in *RHEL*? The right people to

Re: [CentOS] Samba use sendfile configuration option set do disabled as default - why?

2009-08-25 Thread Johnny Hughes
Rick Barnes wrote: happymaster23 wrote: My question is why is this option disabled as default in CentOS? I believe you are not getting the answer you seek because you are not asking the right question to the right people. The right question is Why is this option disabled as default in

[CentOS] Samba use sendfile configuration option set do disabled as default - why?

2009-08-24 Thread happymaster23
Hello, I had problems with speed of Samba, so I was looking for some solution and I had discovered use sendfile configuration option. I was checking all Samba release notes and I had discovered, that from some version (older than is in CentOS repo) this option was turned on as default. So my

Re: [CentOS] Samba use sendfile configuration option set do disabled as default - why?

2009-08-24 Thread Per Qvindesland
Hi Have you tried this one  socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_RCVBUF=65536 SO_SNDBUF=65536 Also look at the log level reduce it to level to or lower. Per --- Original message follows --- SUBJECT: [CentOS] Samba use sendfile configuration option set do disabled as default - why

Re: [CentOS] Samba use sendfile configuration option set do disabled as default - why?

2009-08-24 Thread Christoph Maser
Am Montag, den 24.08.2009, 13:24 +0200 schrieb Per Qvindesland: socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_RCVBUF=65536 SO_SNDBUF=65536 These options are often found if you search for samba tuning. Did someone actaully benchmark the results? Shouldn't tuning buffers manuall be oboslete

Re: [CentOS] Samba use sendfile configuration option set do disabled as default - why?

2009-08-24 Thread Per Qvindesland
the nic seems to be working but it actually has a fault. Regards Per Qvindesland --- Original message follows --- SUBJECT: Re: [CentOS] Samba use sendfile configuration option set do disabled as default - why? FROM:  Christoph Maser TO: CentOS mailing list DATE: 24-08-2009 13:27 Am Montag, den

Re: [CentOS] Samba use sendfile configuration option set do disabled as default - why?

2009-08-24 Thread happymaster23
] Samba use sendfile configuration option set do disabled as default - why? From:  Christoph Maser c...@financial.com To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Date: 24-08-2009 13:27 Am Montag, den 24.08.2009, 13:24 +0200 schrieb Per Qvindesland: socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY

Re: [CentOS] Samba use sendfile configuration option set do disabled as default - why?

2009-08-24 Thread JohnS
On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 15:41 +0200, happymaster23 wrote: Thank you for replies, with option use sendfile = yes it works great (with good speed), but I am asking why is this option in CentOS disabled as default, even in standard samba build it should be (according to Samba release notes)

Re: [CentOS] Samba use sendfile configuration option set do disabled as default - why?

2009-08-24 Thread happymaster23
This is not problem of disks, this is problem of Samba (operating systems in network are Windows XP and Windows 7 only, so this should not be problem caused by Windows). I am asking because of risks and disadvantages. This is same as oplocks - it may be performance tweak, but it is potentially

Re: [CentOS] Samba use sendfile configuration option set do disabled as default - why?

2009-08-24 Thread Les Mikesell
happymaster23 wrote: This is not problem of disks, this is problem of Samba (operating systems in network are Windows XP and Windows 7 only, so this should not be problem caused by Windows). I am asking because of risks and disadvantages. This is same as oplocks - it may be performance