Re: [CentOS] Some relevant information

2011-03-23 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 03/22/2011 08:37 AM, Sam Trenholme wrote: Hello everyone: * DNS does not have a refresh rate. In DNS, the person running the domain determines what the refresh rate (it's called TTL in DNS) for their records is; for example, Google has a TTL of once per hour and my domains (maradns.org,

Re: [CentOS] Some relevant information

2011-03-23 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 5:42 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote: And then looking at the reason for the fails: Differing package requirements certmonger-0.30-4.el5.x86_64.rpm.out: --- work/SL-req         2011-03-23 02:53:25.0 -0500 +++ work/RHEL-req       2011-03-23

Re: [CentOS] Some relevant information

2011-03-23 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 03/23/2011 07:53 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 5:42 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote: And then looking at the reason for the fails: Differing package requirements certmonger-0.30-4.el5.x86_64.rpm.out: --- work/SL-req 2011-03-23 02:53:25.0

Re: [CentOS] Some relevant information

2011-03-23 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote: On 03/23/2011 07:53 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: Ouch. Johnny, I'd really like to replicate this error, but I just don't have the visibility into your build configurations. Saying it's easy to do yourself doesn't work,

Re: [CentOS] Some relevant information

2011-03-23 Thread Dag Wieers
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011, Johnny Hughes wrote: It takes hours to analyze all the packages in a build ... I do not have hours to spend on doing it for SL ... but here is another error that I found in the SL tree when figuring out build issues in the CentOS 5.6 tree: Which is why opening the process

Re: [CentOS] Some relevant information

2011-03-23 Thread Lamar Owen
On Wednesday, March 23, 2011 09:56:34 am Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: Understood. I'd like to replicate or examine the error. Building it yourself, without that access to your unique build environment or a way to gracefully replicate it, represents dozens or hundreds of man-hours for each

Re: [CentOS] Some relevant information

2011-03-23 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote: On Wednesday, March 23, 2011 09:56:34 am Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: Understood. I'd like to replicate or examine the error. Building it yourself, without that access to your unique build environment or a way to gracefully

Re: [CentOS] Some relevant information

2011-03-23 Thread Sam Trenholme
* As mentioned before, Scientific Linux 6.0 is out.  What hasn't been mentioned here is that while SL 5.6 hasn't come out, 5.6 security updates are being backported to SL 5.5.  Ditto with SL 4 (no 4.9 but security patches look current) And we try very hard not to release things until they

Re: [CentOS] Some relevant information

2011-03-23 Thread Rob Kampen
Sam Trenholme wrote: * As mentioned before, Scientific Linux 6.0 is out. What hasn't been mentioned here is that while SL 5.6 hasn't come out, 5.6 security updates are being backported to SL 5.5. Ditto with SL 4 (no 4.9 but security patches look current) And we try very hard not to

[CentOS] Some relevant information

2011-03-22 Thread Sam Trenholme
Hello everyone: * DNS does not have a refresh rate. In DNS, the person running the domain determines what the refresh rate (it's called TTL in DNS) for their records is; for example, Google has a TTL of once per hour and my domains (maradns.org, etc.) have a TTL of one day. * As mentioned