On 01/04/2013 11:53 AM, Ned Slider wrote:
On 04/01/13 15:59, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
In http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Amavisd
there is a recommendation to NOT use the version that comes with Centos
6.3, but to get the more current version from RPMForge.
Is this the 'correct' thing to do on
On 01/10/2013 03:10 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 01/04/2013 11:53 AM, Ned Slider wrote:
On 04/01/13 15:59, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
In http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Amavisd
there is a recommendation to NOT use the version that comes with Centos
6.3, but to get the more current version from
In http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Amavisd
there is a recommendation to NOT use the version that comes with Centos
6.3, but to get the more current version from RPMForge.
Is this the 'correct' thing to do on a Centos-based mail server?
___
CentOS
On 04/01/13 15:59, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
In http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Amavisd
there is a recommendation to NOT use the version that comes with Centos
6.3, but to get the more current version from RPMForge.
Is this the 'correct' thing to do on a Centos-based mail server?
There is no
On 01/04/2013 11:53 AM, Ned Slider wrote:
On 04/01/13 15:59, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
In http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Amavisd
there is a recommendation to NOT use the version that comes with Centos
6.3, but to get the more current version from RPMForge.
Is this the 'correct' thing to do on
On 04.01.2013 17:12, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I have been looking at the same issue WRT Postfix. There the
differences are probably greater between what is available in source
and
what is in 6.3. But I need to resist going with source building, as
then I have to spend more time than I have
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
what is in 6.3. But I need to resist going with source building, as
then I have to spend more time than I have staying up with fixes. I
want an RPM repo to fit into the YUM process.
BTW, I have started this effort following:
Spamassassin seems to have become more-or-less non-functional
in use with KMail on my server.
It appears to be running OK, but only catches about 20% of my spam.
I wonder if others have experienced this decline?
I suspect that sa-learn is not performing properly.
(I run sa-learn nightly on my
On 08/31/2012 04:56 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
It appears to be running OK, but only catches about 20% of my spam.
If you have old rules and as far as spam evolves, that situation is fair
I wonder if others have experienced this decline?
No.
I suspect that sa-learn is not performing
On 2012-08-31 at 17:57:01 +0300, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
On 08/31/2012 04:56 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
Also, about 35% of the spam that gets through is in foreign
languates - Russian, Chinese, Arabic and Turkish -
Those are local langages for some...
Unfortunately you don't
10 matches
Mail list logo
