John Hodrien wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Jun 2016, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>> Btw, I did just update flash-plugin. Does anyone know what the issue was
>> that caused the video issues in the first release of 45, and whether
>> those issues were resolved? Also, were they occurring in C7? Unless
that's the
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Btw, I did just update flash-plugin. Does anyone know what the issue was
that caused the video issues in the first release of 45, and whether those
issues were resolved? Also, were they occurring in C7? Unless that's the
case, it's not just me, but
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Just did some looking, and I see my (C6) mplayer is current, but ffmpeg
has an available update. So, assuming I can update ffmpeg, and it works
with mplayer (I have to use that - if nothing else, to look at
surveillance videos for our secure rooms).
John Hodrien wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Jun 2016, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>> I haven't gone past 38, because when the 45 update came out, and
>> video...like, say, my *required* training from work, when I tried
>> to run it, it crashed firefox. Repeatedly. 100% of the time.
>>
>> Has anyone been using
John Hodrien wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Jun 2016, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>> I haven't gone past 38, because when the 45 update came out, and
>> video...like, say, my *required* training from work, when I tried to
>> run it, it crashed firefox. Repeatedly. 100% of the time.
>>
>> Has anyone been using
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I haven't gone past 38, because when the 45 update came out, and video...
like, say, my *required* training from work, when I tried to run it, it
crashed firefox. Repeatedly. 100% of the time.
Has anyone been using the current version had trouble
I haven't gone past 38, because when the 45 update came out, and video...
like, say, my *required* training from work, when I tried to run it, it
crashed firefox. Repeatedly. 100% of the time.
Has anyone been using the current version had trouble with video, etc? I'd
like to update, but not if I
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
The latest version seems to have a bug. One of my users went to look at a
paper in Phy Rev E, and the firefox pdf view looked fine... but what
printed had garbage for scales on the graphs. Then I had him use the
firefox print preview... and it was garbage. Looked
On Tue, 11 Feb 2014, Nux! wrote:
On 11.02.2014 19:40, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
The latest version seems to have a bug. One of my users went to look
at a
paper in Phy Rev E, and the firefox pdf view looked fine... but what
printed had garbage for scales on the graphs. Then I had him use the
On 2/12/2014 15:04, m...@tdiehl.org wrote:
I guess it is hard to get it tested without making
it the default.
No need to guess. There's plenty of evidence that at a certain point,
software needs to be battle tested to shake the last bugs out.
Take btrfs. It's been included in shipping
The latest version seems to have a bug. One of my users went to look at a
paper in Phy Rev E, and the firefox pdf view looked fine... but what
printed had garbage for scales on the graphs. Then I had him use the
firefox print preview... and it was garbage. Looked at it on my system,
ditto, and
On 02/11/2014 01:40 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
The latest version seems to have a bug. One of my users went to look at a
paper in Phy Rev E, and the firefox pdf view looked fine... but what
printed had garbage for scales on the graphs. Then I had him use the
firefox print preview... and it
Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 02/11/2014 01:40 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
The latest version seems to have a bug. One of my users went to look at
a
paper in Phy Rev E, and the firefox pdf view looked fine... but what
printed had garbage for scales on the graphs. Then I had him use the
firefox
On 2/11/2014 12:40, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Save as (why isn't there an open?) a .pdf, pull it up in acroread, and
print, and everything's fine.
The Firefox PDF engine is new, and PDF is complex. Hence, Firefox PDF
still has problems.
This is almost certainly not the right list to get this
On 2/11/2014 14:27, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Phys Rev E, vol 77, article 030902. Do a print preview, which takes a long
time, then look at the scales to the graphs on pages two and three.
APS » Journals » Authorization Required
Authorization Required
Individual Subscribers
Please log
Warren Young wrote:
On 2/11/2014 14:27, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Phys Rev E, vol 77, article 030902. Do a print preview, which takes a
long
time, then look at the scales to the graphs on pages two and three.
APS » Journals » Authorization Required
Authorization Required
Individual
On 11.02.2014 19:40, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
The latest version seems to have a bug. One of my users went to look
at a
paper in Phy Rev E, and the firefox pdf view looked fine... but what
printed had garbage for scales on the graphs. Then I had him use the
firefox print preview... and it was
On 2/11/2014 14:36, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
for right now, that was the one that showed the problem.
PRX is open-access: http://prx.aps.org/
Perhaps you can come up with a cite in that or another open-access
journal, like arXiv?
___
CentOS mailing
On 02/12/2014 10:27 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 02/11/2014 01:40 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
The latest version seems to have a bug. One of my users went to look at
a
paper in Phy Rev E, and the firefox pdf view looked fine... but what
printed had garbage for scales on
19 matches
Mail list logo
