Hello Tom,
On Tue, 2012-06-12 at 17:12 +0100, Tom Brown wrote:
To close the loop on this by making the 32 bit tar package available
to the system during the update allowed the update to progress as it
got pulled in as a dep during the yum run and all was happy.
I suppose my idea that this
http://yum.baseurl.org/wiki/YumDB
shame thats not actually available in CentOS 5
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
# yum update
Loaded plugins: downloadonly, fastestmirror, rhnplugin
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
Setting up Update Process
Resolving Dependencies
-- Running transaction check
snip
--- Package tar.x86_64 2:1.15.1-32.el5_8 set to be updated
-- Processing Dependency: /bin/tar
Hi
Trying to apply all available updates to CentOS 5 and the following is observed
# yum update
Loaded plugins: downloadonly, fastestmirror, rhnplugin
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
Setting up Update Process
Resolving Dependencies
-- Running transaction check
snip
-- Running
On 06/11/2012 06:21 AM, Tom Brown wrote:
Hi
Trying to apply all available updates to CentOS 5 and the following is
observed
# yum update
Loaded plugins: downloadonly, fastestmirror, rhnplugin
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
Setting up Update Process
Resolving Dependencies
--
The issue seems to be that the package tar was somehow removed from your
system.
When you tried to update, the system saw that the package tar was
removed from the system and that it was required by the already
installed package redhat-lsb.
This means that somehow, someone removed the
On 06/11/2012 07:17 AM, Tom Brown wrote:
The issue seems to be that the package tar was somehow removed from your
system.
When you tried to update, the system saw that the package tar was
removed from the system and that it was required by the already
installed package redhat-lsb.
This
Somehow it is NOT in the rpm database ... that is why yum thinks it is
not there.
This could also happen accidentally with multilib installs (it looks
like you do have this possible issue).
When a system is installed in c5, the default behavior is that both i386
and x86_64 packages are
from memory i have not deliberately removed the i386 package, but you
are right it is not there, however rpm does seem to know about
/bin/tar
# rpm -ql tar
/bin/gtar
/bin/tar
snip
although i agree its something rpm db related as reinstalling tar via
rpm rather than yum solves the
Johnny Hughes wrote:
snip
When adding packages, Yum can do two things ... install or update ...
and it does each differently.
snip of much-appreciated explanation of how yum
install/update/localinstall works
The problem all along is that someone did a force removal of tar (at
least from the
Hello Tom,
On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 14:23 +0100, Tom Brown wrote:
from memory i have not deliberately removed the i386 package, but you
are right it is not there, however rpm does seem to know about
/bin/tar
# rpm -ql tar
/bin/gtar
/bin/tar
snip
although i agree its something rpm db
rm /bin/tar will remove the binary but not update the rpmdb.
rpm -V {package}
to verify the package installation.
well yes - but tar is not removed, that is the point, its something to
do with rpm thinking its not there when in fact it is
___
CentOS
Hello Tom,
On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 15:48 +0100, Tom Brown wrote:
well yes - but tar is not removed, that is the point,
I guess I'll have to take your word for it as there is nothing in what
you mention that verifies this statement. rpm -ql tar will not verify
that any files are actually there,
I guess I'll have to take your word for it as there is nothing in what
you mention that verifies this statement. rpm -ql tar will not verify
that any files are actually there, just that they got installed at some
point.
Did you verify /bin/tar was actually there before you did the yum
On 06/11/2012 09:32 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
snip
When adding packages, Yum can do two things ... install or update ...
and it does each differently.
snip of much-appreciated explanation of how yum
install/update/localinstall works
The problem all along is that
Ron Blizzard wrote:
Hello.
Missing Dependency: libavcodec.so.51 is needed by package
transcode-1.0.5-1.el5.rf.i386 (installed)
Missing Dependency: libx264.so.55 is needed by package
transcode-1.0.5-1.el5.rf.i386 (installed)
Ask in the rpmforge list. This has nothing to do with CentOS repo.
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 3:20 AM, Olaf Muellerdaily-pla...@istari.de wrote:
Ron Blizzard wrote:
Hello.
Missing Dependency: libavcodec.so.51 is needed by package
transcode-1.0.5-1.el5.rf.i386 (installed)
Missing Dependency: libx264.so.55 is needed by package
transcode-1.0.5-1.el5.rf.i386
I come to you hat in hand again. For the first time in a long while
I got a Update Notification at the bottom of my screen -- so I
decided to click on it and run the update. Unfortunately I got a
couple dependency errors and am not sure how to solve them. (Not even
sure why I got them.)
They are
I should also mention that I added (a few days ago) the M Harris
repository so that I could install Firefox 3.5.
--
RonB -- Using CentOS 5.3
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Ron Blizzardrb4cen...@gmail.com wrote:
I should also mention that I added (a few days ago) the M Harris
repository so that I could install Firefox 3.5.
I ran an update for my rpmforge stuff this morning and saw the same
thing. Anyone here have a clue? I'm
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 9:12 PM, MHRmhullr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Ron Blizzardrb4cen...@gmail.com wrote:
I should also mention that I added (a few days ago) the M Harris
repository so that I could install Firefox 3.5.
I ran an update for my rpmforge stuff this
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 7:46 PM, Ron Blizzardrb4cen...@gmail.com wrote:
A few days ago, I think someone mentioned that they were doing
something at RPMForge. I'm guessing this is part of it -- this is is
an old Pentium III that I've got CentOS 4.7 on, and I tried to do an
update (haven't
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 9:54 PM, MHRmhullr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 7:46 PM, Ron Blizzardrb4cen...@gmail.com wrote:
A few days ago, I think someone mentioned that they were doing
something at RPMForge. I'm guessing this is part of it -- this is is
an old Pentium III that
On Saturday 04 April 2009, John Hinton wrote:
I seem to be able to get all of the 5.x update except for the kernel.
Each attempt results in this...
(1/1): kernel-2.6.18-128. 100% |=| 15 MB
00:16
John Hinton wrote:
I seem to be able to get all of the 5.x update except for the kernel.
Each attempt results in this...
(1/1): kernel-2.6.18-128. 100% |=| 15 MB
00:16
http://centos.mirror.nac.net/5.3/updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.i686.rpm:
I seem to be able to get all of the 5.x update except for the kernel.
Each attempt results in this...
(1/1): kernel-2.6.18-128. 100% |=| 15 MB
00:16
http://centos.mirror.nac.net/5.3/updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.i686.rpm:
[Errno -1] Package does
John Hinton wrote:
Error Downloading Packages:
kernel - 2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.i686: failure:
RPMS/kernel-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.i686.rpm from updates: [Errno 256] No
more mirrors to try.
Is this just me? I've tried at different times from different machines
and it seems that all other files are
nate wrote:
John Hinton wrote:
Error Downloading Packages:
kernel - 2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.i686: failure:
RPMS/kernel-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.i686.rpm from updates: [Errno 256] No
more mirrors to try.
Is this just me? I've tried at different times from different machines
and it seems that all
28 matches
Mail list logo
