/
Rome / Stockholm / Vienna
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Upgrade perl; package conflict
Phil Schaffner wrote:
On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 08:55 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm working on upgrading my Xen Domain0 to CentOs 5.2. However, yum
update gives me a package conflict on perl:
...
Using a x86_64
: Thursday, June 26, 2008 8:34:11 PM GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin /
Bern / Rome / Stockholm / Vienna
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Upgrade perl; package conflict
Phil Schaffner wrote:
On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 08:55 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm working on upgrading my Xen Domain0 to CentOs 5.2
On Sun, 2008-06-29 at 16:46 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
I am still having this same problem. The only non-CentOS package I have
installed is Astro::Time via cpan. I have looked at the bug report but
am not sure what to do next. I have two x86_64 units that still
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
On Sun, 2008-06-29 at 16:46 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
I am still having this same problem. The only non-CentOS package I have
installed is Astro::Time via cpan. I have looked at the bug report but
am not sure what to do next. I have two
It looks like some perl thing is trying to keep the perl at the OLD level.
(you have plenty of rf packages, which is rpmforge ... those are
NON-CentOS pacakges. I am not saying those are the problem, just
pointing out your original statement is in error where you list only one
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
It looks like some perl thing is trying to keep the perl at the OLD level.
(you have plenty of rf packages, which is rpmforge ... those are
NON-CentOS pacakges. I am not saying those are the problem, just
pointing out your original statement is in error where you list
Thanks again for your help!!!
is it possible that you have extras set at a different priority than
base ... you also have the protectbase installed along with priorities
(not recommended).
You should have these settings for [extras], [base] and [updates]
sections in
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
Thanks again for your help!!!
is it possible that you have extras set at a different priority than
base ... you also have the protectbase installed along with priorities
(not recommended).
You should have these settings for [extras], [base] and [updates]
sections in
On Sun, 2008-06-29 at 15:41 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
Thanks again for your help!!!
is it possible that you have extras set at a different priority than
base ... you also have the protectbase installed along with priorities
(not recommended).
You should
Removing perl.i386 fixed this...
Thanks!
- Original Message -
From: Ralph Angenendt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: centos@centos.org
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 8:34:11 PM GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Bern /
Rome / Stockholm / Vienna
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Upgrade perl; package conflict
Hi!
I'm working on upgrading my Xen Domain0 to CentOs 5.2. However, yum update
gives me a package conflict on perl:
Running Transaction Test
Finished Transaction Test
Transaction Check Error:
file /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/pod/perldiag.pod from install of
perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3 conflicts with
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 8:55 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Transaction Check Error:
file /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/pod/perldiag.pod from install of
perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2
file /usr/share/man/man1/c2ph.1.gz from install of
On Jun 26, 2008, at 2:55 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I'm working on upgrading my Xen Domain0 to CentOs 5.2. However, yum
update gives me a package conflict on perl:
Running Transaction Test
Finished Transaction Test
Transaction Check Error:
file
On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 08:55 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I'm working on upgrading my Xen Domain0 to CentOs 5.2. However, yum update
gives me a package conflict on perl:
...
Using a x86_64 install btw.
Anyone seen this one??
Please don't hijack threads with a Reply when starting
Phil Schaffner wrote:
On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 08:55 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm working on upgrading my Xen Domain0 to CentOs 5.2. However, yum
update gives me a package conflict on perl:
...
Using a x86_64 install btw.
Anyone seen this one??
Please don't hijack threads with a
15 matches
Mail list logo
