James Pearson wrote:
>
> I've installed VirtualBox v5.2 on a CentOS 7.4 machine, but VMs set up
> with bridged networking can not 'see' past the VirtualBox host machine
>
> i.e. the VM can ping the host and vice versa, but the VM can not ping
> anything else and other machines
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 10:47 AM, James Pearson
wrote:
> Googling doesn't show up any similar issues, so I guess I'm missing
> something on the host machine
>
> Does anyone have any idea what could be the issue?
>
What kind of hardware? There can be issues with
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 03:47:42PM +, James Pearson wrote:
> I've installed VirtualBox v5.2 on a CentOS 7.4 machine, but VMs set up
> with bridged networking can not 'see' past the VirtualBox host machine
>
> i.e. the VM can ping the host and vice versa, but the VM can not ping
I've installed VirtualBox v5.2 on a CentOS 7.4 machine, but VMs set up
with bridged networking can not 'see' past the VirtualBox host machine
i.e. the VM can ping the host and vice versa, but the VM can not ping
anything else and other machines on the same subnet can't ping the VM
Hello,
Am Samstag, den 12.07.2014 um 12:11 -0700 schrieb Greg Bailey:
On 07/12/2014 12:02 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 07:55:52PM +0200, Matthias Petermann wrote:
Hi there,
because I just noticed that there is still no RPM package for RHEL 7/
CentOS 7 for Virtualbox
noticed that there is still no RPM package for RHEL 7/
CentOS 7 for Virtualbox what is the safest and cleanest way to
install Virtualbox on CentOS 7? Has anyone already done and can make a
recommendation?
I always just download it from virtualbox.org, also making sure to
get
Hi there,
because I just noticed that there is still no RPM package for RHEL 7/
CentOS 7 for Virtualbox what is the safest and cleanest way to
install Virtualbox on CentOS 7? Has anyone already done and can make a
recommendation?
Thanks Regards,
Matthias
--
Matthias Petermann matth
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 07:55:52PM +0200, Matthias Petermann wrote:
Hi there,
because I just noticed that there is still no RPM package for RHEL 7/
CentOS 7 for Virtualbox what is the safest and cleanest way to
install Virtualbox on CentOS 7? Has anyone already done and can make
On 07/12/2014 12:02 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 07:55:52PM +0200, Matthias Petermann wrote:
Hi there,
because I just noticed that there is still no RPM package for RHEL 7/
CentOS 7 for Virtualbox what is the safest and cleanest way to
install Virtualbox on CentOS 7
On Thu, 3 Nov 2011, Christopher Chan wrote:
How many cores assigned? VT-X/AMD-V enabled? Hardware?
Typically 1, yes VT-X is enabled, Core2Duo/Core2Quad and some newer Nehalem
based Xeons. IO-apic is enabled as Win7 64bit wouldn't boot with our image
without it.
jh
to support
seamless mouse and keyboard integration
- ... not to mention resizing the machine window
- Here's a relatively complete description on turning VirtualBox into a service
under Redhat/Centos/Fedora
(http://www.kernelhardware.org/virtualbox-auto-start-vm-centos-fedora-redhat/).
Though I'd replace
to support
seamless mouse and keyboard integration
- ... not to mention resizing the machine window
- Here's a relatively complete description on turning VirtualBox into a
service under Redhat/Centos/Fedora
(http://www.kernelhardware.org/virtualbox-auto-start-vm-centos-fedora-redhat
Vreme: 11/02/2011 09:10 AM, Lorenzo Martínez Rodríguez piše:
I had problems with VBox 4 in my CentOS6, so I had to install
VirtualBox-3.2-3.2.12_68302_rhel6-1.x86_64 and I am very very happy with it.
VMware Server meant a lot of problems with new kernels and the patch
any-any... so I think
If you want to install Virtualbox in CentOS, it is easy. Go to this download
link http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/4.1.4/VirtualBox-4.1-4.1.4_74291_rhel6-1.i686.rpm .
and download the RPM File, after simply install it.
I am not such a fan of Virtualbox neither but You can try
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 4:04 AM, Roy Trubshaw roy.trubs...@yahoo.co.ukwrote:
- Here's a relatively complete description on turning VirtualBox into a
service under Redhat/Centos/Fedora (
http://www.kernelhardware.org/virtualbox-auto-start-vm-centos-fedora-redhat/
).
Using VB 4.1.x under
On Wednesday, November 02, 2011 04:55 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
Vreme: 11/02/2011 09:10 AM, Lorenzo Martínez Rodríguez piše:
I had problems with VBox 4 in my CentOS6, so I had to install
VirtualBox-3.2-3.2.12_68302_rhel6-1.x86_64 and I am very very happy with it.
VMware Server meant a
On Wed, 2 Nov 2011, Christopher Chan wrote:
4.0.x was okay for me (Windows server guests) but 4.1.4 was a complete
disaster. The guest literally moved at SNAIL pace. Removed all cores
save one and then it moved at TURTLE pace. 4.1.x is do not touch even
with a ten foot pole. At least with
This doesn't appear to be universally true. We've run 4.1.4 with Windows 7
64bit on top of CentOS 6 and not seen any noticeable performance problems.
The way you describe it makes me think it's not the sort of thing we could not
notice if it was happening. This was Windows 7 Enterprise as
On Wednesday, November 02, 2011 10:33 PM, John Hodrien wrote:
On Wed, 2 Nov 2011, Christopher Chan wrote:
4.0.x was okay for me (Windows server guests) but 4.1.4 was a complete
disaster. The guest literally moved at SNAIL pace. Removed all cores
save one and then it moved at TURTLE pace.
On Wednesday, November 02, 2011 10:33 PM, John Hodrien wrote:
On Wed, 2 Nov 2011, Christopher Chan wrote:
4.0.x was okay for me (Windows server guests) but 4.1.4 was a complete
disaster. The guest literally moved at SNAIL pace. Removed all cores
save one and then it moved at TURTLE pace.
I have an older quad-core AMD processor that supports hardware
virtualization on a motherboard that does not support it in the bios.
Eventually I'll swap the mobo out on this box for one that will support
hardware virtualization and use qemu-kvm. I prefer kvm because of
SELinux and sVirt that
Any tips/tricks concerning it?
While I am used to using esx, I am forced to use vb on my wkst at my
new gig and can tell you there are age old bugs that have never been
resolved with respect to snap shot children not being cleaned up properly
and the xml config while having a nice programatic
On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 20:32 -0500, fred smith wrote:
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 04:13:04PM +, Lars Hecking wrote:
I tried everything in that post as well, and nothing worked for me.
Finally I found the process I laid out and it worked.
The link to it is here which is an old
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 04:13:04PM +, Lars Hecking wrote:
I tried everything in that post as well, and nothing worked for me.
Finally I found the process I laid out and it worked.
The link to it is here which is an old ticket:
http://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/705
I've
I tried everything in that post as well, and nothing worked for me.
Finally I found the process I laid out and it worked.
The link to it is here which is an old ticket:
http://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/705
I've tested it and it works! Presumably, it might have worked in some of
my
Lars Hecking wrote:
I've tested it and it works! Presumably, it might have worked in some of
my previous attempts, but I only now figured out that I need to manually
attach the device via device menu or USB icon. Not exactly plug and play,
but workable.
The mount command itself is
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Lars Hecking
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 7:24 AM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] VirtualBox and CentOS
I recently doownloaded and installed the latest RHEL5 rpm
I recently doownloaded and installed the latest RHEL5 rpm from the VirtualBox
web site. While it generally works very well, I have been unable to get USB
access to work on the guest.
This seems to be a very common problem. Many references to it turn up in a
web search, but I have not found
Lars Hecking wrote:
I recently doownloaded and installed the latest RHEL5 rpm from the VirtualBox
web site. While it generally works very well, I have been unable to get USB
access to work on the guest.
This seems to be a very common problem. Many references to it turn up in a
web
Get your vboxusers group ID
# cat /etc/group | vboxusers
Remount the USBFS with your vboxusers GID
# mount -t usbfs -o remount,devgid=GID,devmode=664 /proc/bus/usb
/proc/bus/usb
This is the bit that won't work. The mount options seem to have no effect:
# ll /proc/bus
total 0
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Lars Hecking
lheck...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
I would imaging it's rather similar to this -
http://forums.virtualbox.org/viewtopic.php?f=7t=20097
--
During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.
George Orwell
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Jim Perrin jper...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Lars Hecking
lheck...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
I would imaging it's rather similar to this -
http://forums.virtualbox.org/viewtopic.php?f=7t=20097
Gah, lowsy spel chekc not pikcing up
Jim Perrin writes:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Lars Hecking
lheck...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
I would imaging it's rather similar to this -
http://forums.virtualbox.org/viewtopic.php?f=7t=20097
Been there, tried that.
VirtualBox actually complains if you mess with
Jim Perrin wrote:
I would imaging it's rather similar to this -
http://forums.virtualbox.org/viewtopic.php?f=7t=20097
Gah, lowsy spel chekc not pikcing up waht I mean. s/imaging/imagine/
Ridiculous, I know...a computer should know what you're thinking and how
to spell it. :)
I tried
Lars Hecking wrote:
This is the bit that won't work. The mount options seem to have no effect:
dr-xr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Dec 8 12:08 001
dr-xr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Dec 8 12:08 002
dr-xr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Dec 8 12:08 003
dr-xr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Dec 8 12:08 004
dr-xr-xr-x 2 root root 0
35 matches
Mail list logo