Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 1:15 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 10/04/2016 03:24 AM, Leon Fauster wrote: > >> This can be accomplished by just this (generates ifcfg files etc): >> >> # virsh iface-bridge eth0 br0 >> > > > Brilliant! I'm not sure why I haven't noticed that

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Gordon Messmer > Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 1:18 PM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking > > On 10/04/2016 04:18 A

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

On 04/10/16 11:24, Leon Fauster wrote: > Am 04.10.2016 um 08:46 schrieb Gordon Messmer : >> On 10/03/2016 07:00 PM, TE Dukes wrote: >>> /etc/sysconfig/ifcfg-eth1 >>> GATEWAY=192.168.1.1 >> ... >>> /etc/sysconfig/ifcfg-lo >>> GATEWAY=192.168.1.1 >> >> Don't specify

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

On 10/04/2016 04:18 AM, TE Dukes wrote: I disabled NetworkManager and created one. You don't need to do that on CentOS 7, and I wouldn't recommend it. Use NetworkManager where it works. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

On 10/04/2016 03:24 AM, Leon Fauster wrote: This can be accomplished by just this (generates ifcfg files etc): # virsh iface-bridge eth0 br0 Brilliant! I'm not sure why I haven't noticed that in the docs, before. I've definitely been to the page where Red Hat documents it... Thanks.

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

> Date: Monday, October 03, 2016 22:00:07 -0400 > From: TE Dukes > > I posted some files previously but that was like 20 or so installs > ago. I don't know the files you need. >From what you've indicated, you appear to be deleting/reinstalling when the networking

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

Am 04.10.2016 um 08:46 schrieb Gordon Messmer : > On 10/03/2016 07:00 PM, TE Dukes wrote: >> /etc/sysconfig/ifcfg-eth1 >> GATEWAY=192.168.1.1 > ... >> /etc/sysconfig/ifcfg-lo >> GATEWAY=192.168.1.1 > > Don't specify GATEWAY in interface files where it isn't used. This

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Gordon Messmer > Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 2:47 AM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking > > On 10/03/2016

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Richard > Sent: Monday, October 3, 2016 10:41 PM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking > > > > > Date: Monday

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of John R Pierce > Sent: Monday, October 3, 2016 10:18 PM > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking > > On 10/3/2016 7:00 P

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

On 10/03/2016 07:00 PM, TE Dukes wrote: /etc/sysconfig/ifcfg-eth1 GATEWAY=192.168.1.1 ... /etc/sysconfig/ifcfg-lo GATEWAY=192.168.1.1 Don't specify GATEWAY in interface files where it isn't used. This should be set on eth0 only. # brctl show bridge name bridge id STP

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

> Date: Monday, October 03, 2016 22:00:07 -0400 > From: TE Dukes > >> From: Gordon Messmer >> Sent: Monday, October 3, 2016 4:25 PM >> >> On 10/03/2016 04:54 AM, TE Dukes wrote: >> > I can get the guest to access the internet but have tried every >> > was possible

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

On 10/3/2016 7:00 PM, TE Dukes wrote: 4: vboxnet0: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UNKNOWN qlen 1000 link/ether 0a:00:27:00:00:00 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff are there any other /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg- files beyond the ones you listed? -- john r

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Gordon Messmer > Sent: Monday, October 3, 2016 4:25 PM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking > > On 10/03/2016 04:54 A

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

On 10/03/2016 04:54 AM, TE Dukes wrote: I can get the guest to access the internet but have tried every was possible to be able to access the guest from the LAN or even the host. Nothing I have tried works. The only thing all documentation leaves out is how to set up the guest networking during

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 07:54:36AM -0400, TE Dukes wrote: > > OK, I'm about done trying to get this to work. I have spent HOURS reading, > installing, re-installing, etc. > > I can get the guest to access the internet but have tried every was possible > to be able to access the guest from the

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Liam O'Toole Sent: Monday, October 3, 2016 10:28 AM To: centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking On 2016-10-03, TE Dukes <tdu...@palmettoshopper.com>

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

On 2016-10-03, TE Dukes <tdu...@palmettoshopper.com> wrote: > > >> -Original Message- From: >> centos-boun...@centos.org >> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On >> Behalf Of Liam O'Toole Sent: Monday, October 3, 2016 9:19 AM To: >> centos@centos.o

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Liam O'Toole > Sent: Monday, October 3, 2016 9:19 AM > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking > > On 201

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

On 2016-10-03, TE Dukes <tdu...@palmettoshopper.com> wrote: > > >> -Original Message- From: >> centos-boun...@centos.org >> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On >> Behalf Of Michael Cole Sent: Friday, September 30, 2016 9:41 PM To: >&

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

gt; > To: centos@centos.org > > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking > > > > Deletion does not remove all, Try a erase if that did not work. > > > > Configuration files are not always where you expect then to be. > > > > Regards Michael Cole

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Michael Cole > Sent: Friday, September 30, 2016 9:41 PM > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking > > Deletion does not

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

I deleted all virtualization packages and re-installed. Something must have been hosed up. Installing a VM and it didn't even ask to setup the network. Hopefully that's a good sign. Will know shortly TIA ___ CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Richard > Sent: Friday, September 30, 2016 8:50 AM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking > > > > > Date: Fr

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

> Date: Friday, September 30, 2016 07:14:59 -0400 > From: TE Dukes >> From: Gordon Messmer >> Sent: Friday, September 30, 2016 1:01 AM >> >> On 09/29/2016 07:54 PM, TE Dukes wrote: >> > For whatever reason, the default NAT setup no longer works. >> >> Start over

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Gordon Messmer > Sent: Friday, September 30, 2016 1:01 AM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking > > On 09/29/2016

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

On 09/29/2016 07:54 PM, TE Dukes wrote: For whatever reason, the default NAT setup no longer works. Start over with a new install. Record each change you make, carefully. I got some kind of bridge network (mactap) setup that has access to the outside but I still can't connect locally. As

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Gordon Messmer > Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 11:47 AM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking > > On

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of John R Pierce > Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2016 2:16 PM > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking > > On

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

On 09/28/2016 08:43 AM, tdu...@palmettoshopper.com wrote: I have one of those free domains/DNS from no-ip.com, centos7vm.ddns.net I plan to use as the host name. I want to be able to access this VM from the internet. ... This is what I was seeing. Either it lands on the DSL router's login

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

On 9/28/2016 11:09 AM, tdu...@palmettoshopper.com wrote: I guess this is why I'm confused. I thought a VM could be setup as its own domain with all available services. it can, if its got its own internet IP address... but if you're on consumer internet, with only one public IP address, then

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

Original Message Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking From: Warren Young <w...@etr-usa.com> Date: Wed, September 28, 2016 1:19 pm To: CentOS mailing list <centos@centos.org> On Sep 28, 2016, at 9:43 AM, <tdu...@palmettoshopper.com> <tdu..

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

Original Message Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking From: John R Pierce <pie...@hogranch.com> Date: Wed, September 28, 2016 12:54 pm To: CentOS mailing list <centos@centos.org> On 9/28/2016 8:43 AM, tdu...@palmettoshopper.com wrote: > I'm a

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

On Sep 28, 2016, at 9:43 AM, wrote: > > The first one, I created in my / file system but didn't really have the > space so I deleted it. One of the primary advantages of VMs over real machines is that you can pause them, move them, and

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

On 9/28/2016 8:43 AM, tdu...@palmettoshopper.com wrote: I'm a little confused on which networking option I need to choose when setting up a VM. the host thats running the VM, is it connected to a LAN behind a firewall/router, or directly to the internet? if directly, is there a dedicated

[CentOS] Virtualization Networking

Hello, I'm a little confused on which networking option I need to choose when setting up a VM. I set up two VMs this past weekend both with NAT. Both able to were access the internet. The first one, I created in my / file system but didn't really have the space so I deleted it. The second one,

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization

I use VirtualBox (on a CentOS host machine) because it allows me to use multiple large monitors on my guests. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization

well. current version of kvm on centos does not allow live backups without downtime to guest. it's only possible with newer version of kvm and related qemu tools.. so sad.. -- Eero 2015-06-17 19:44 GMT+03:00 Gordon Messmer gordon.mess...@gmail.com: On 06/17/2015 03:32 AM, Robert Heller wrote:

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization

On 06/17/2015 10:24 AM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote: On 06/17/2015 04:52 PM, Lamar Owen wrote: But to address the direct question of the OP, I use KVM for many things, but I have older hardware in quantity on which I'll likely run Xen4CentOS with paravirtualized guests, Is not LXC an

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization

On 06/17/2015 09:54 AM, Alessandro Baggi wrote: Also ESX(i) is not CentOS related but is included in this post. And what about oVirt? MMmmm, I really thought ESX was in some way a RHEL derivative but when reading http://www.v-front.de/2013/08/a-myth-busted-and-faq-esxi-is-not-based.html it

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization

qemu-img works for most image conversion formats including from vmware to kvm. try it? -- Eero 2015-06-17 14:43 GMT+03:00 Mihamina Rakotomandimby mihamina.rakotomandi...@rktmb.org: On 06/17/2015 11:10 AM, John R Pierce wrote: regardless of all that noise, in RHEL and therefore CentOS, KVM

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization

On 06/17/2015 11:10 AM, John R Pierce wrote: regardless of all that noise, in RHEL and therefore CentOS, KVM is the preferred and best supported hypervisor. I dont catch your point. The OP was wide enough in his question in order to allow that discussion. Anyway, I'll add one point:

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization

regardless of all that noise, in RHEL and therefore CentOS, KVM is the preferred and best supported hypervisor. -- john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization

Please don't top-post with fully quoting all previous content. This is a mailinglist. Proxmox VE is based on Debian. What does this have to do with CentOS? As it makes use of KVM you can run CentOS on top of it as a virtualization guest. Alexander

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization

It's so sad that centos is using very old versio on kvm and due that fact live backup without downtime is not possible. Anyway, virtsh+virtmanager + kvm is good choice. -- Eero 2015-06-17 11:10 GMT+03:00 John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com: regardless of all that noise, in RHEL and therefore

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization

yep, but still lack critical features :) like livebackup. 2015-06-17 12:26 GMT+03:00 Leon Fauster leonfaus...@googlemail.com: Am 17.06.2015 um 11:17 schrieb Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fi: It's so sad that centos is using very old versio on kvm and due that fact live backup without

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization

Am 17.06.2015 um 11:17 schrieb Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fi: It's so sad that centos is using very old versio on kvm and due that fact live backup without downtime is not possible. just some thoughts old != not good new != better s/old/stable/ s/new/not\ mature/ :-) -- LF

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization

At Wed, 17 Jun 2015 12:31:49 +0300 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote: yep, but still lack critical features :) like livebackup. If host is using LVM for disk partitioning and uses logical volumes for VM disks, it is possible to do LVM 'snapshots' and these snapshots can then be

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization

On 06/17/2015 03:28 AM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote: MMmmm, I really thought ESX was in some way a RHEL derivative but when reading http://www.v-front.de/2013/08/a-myth-busted-and-faq-esxi-is-not-based.html it is clearly not... Older ESX had an RHEL 3-based service console; ESXi does not.

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization

On 06/17/2015 04:52 PM, Lamar Owen wrote: But to address the direct question of the OP, I use KVM for many things, but I have older hardware in quantity on which I'll likely run Xen4CentOS with paravirtualized guests, Is not LXC an alternative for such situation? Simpler, fully integrated

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization

On 06/17/2015 03:32 AM, Robert Heller wrote: If host is using LVM for disk partitioning and uses logical volumes for VM disks, it is possible to do LVM 'snapshots' and these snapshots can then be backed up, all without shutting down the VMs. Note that making an LVM snapshot, alone, will not

[CentOS] Virtualization

Hi list, what solution do you use for virtualizzation? thanks in advance. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization

KVM - Vagrant - Docker :) On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 at 17:41 Alessandro Baggi alessandro.ba...@gmail.com wrote: Hi list, what solution do you use for virtualizzation? thanks in advance. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization

ESX(i) 6 and vCloud Air. At home, KVM and Vagrant. On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Numan Fatih YARCI fatih.ya...@linux.org.tr wrote: KVM - Vagrant - Docker :) On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 at 17:41 Alessandro Baggi alessandro.ba...@gmail.com wrote: Hi list, what solution do you use for

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization

What do you think about Proxmox VE? ESX(i) 6 and vCloud Air. At home, KVM and Vagrant. On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Numan Fatih YARCI fatih.ya...@linux.org.tr wrote: KVM - Vagrant - Docker :) On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 at 17:41 Alessandro Baggi alessandro.ba...@gmail.com wrote: Hi list,

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization

Am 16.06.2015 um 18:50 schrieb Alessandro Baggi: What do you think about Proxmox VE? Please don't top-post with fully quoting all previous content. This is a mailinglist. Proxmox VE is based on Debian. What does this have to do with CentOS? As it makes use of KVM you can run CentOS on top

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization

On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 11:06:20PM +0200, Alexander Dalloz wrote: Am 16.06.2015 um 18:50 schrieb Alessandro Baggi: What do you think about Proxmox VE? Please don't top-post with fully quoting all previous content. This is a mailinglist. Proxmox VE is based on Debian. What does this have

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization

On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 06:50:27PM +0200, Alessandro Baggi wrote: What do you think about Proxmox VE? It appears to just be an interface that runs on top of KVM and OpenVZ. -- Jonathan Billings billi...@negate.org ___ CentOS mailing list

[CentOS] Virtualization of a production environment

I need to virtualize a server, but this needs to be stable enough for production. What are the advantages/disadvantages of the different hypervisers with CENTOS ESXi (vmware) XEN KVM Primarily I will be running Centos6.4 there may or may not be a windows server. I need stability as this

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization in RHEL

On 06/08/2013 07:11 AM, Scott Robbins wrote: On Sat, Jun 08, 2013 at 08:03:36AM -0400, Fidel Dominguez wrote: Hello Friends I need a guide to virtualization in RHEL. I think it would help if you were a bit more specific. For example, putting ks.cfg virtualbox into google came up with this

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization in RHEL

On 06/08/2013 08:16 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 06/08/2013 07:11 AM, Scott Robbins wrote: On Sat, Jun 08, 2013 at 08:03:36AM -0400, Fidel Dominguez wrote: Hello Friends I need a guide to virtualization in RHEL. I think it would help if you were a bit more specific. For example, putting

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization in RHEL

On 08.Jun.2013, at 14:03, Fidel Dominguez wrote: What I want to achieve is to install a virtual machine from a ks.cfg on RHEL 6 How would you do it with a bare metal machine? I do not think your question has anything to do with virtualization. That said, try virt-manager, while creating a

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Options!

Am 01.11.2012 13:55, schrieb Johnny Hughes: Note: This is a very good resource to explain the differences between a Cloud and Virtualization: http://vimeo.com/51856809 Is that available as text somewhere? Presentation videos are so wearisome to sit through, especially if they are in a

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Options!

Hi folks, Thanks for your advices, I'll take a look on all and post what I conclude on it. Maybe I'm not clear enought, I already had CentOS5.8 Xen on my Hosts, but I'm finding a solution more enterprise. The HA/Load Balance solution we had are self made, it is much time consuming for

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Options!

On 11/01/2012 06:53 AM, Antonio da Silva Martins Junior wrote: Hi folks, Thanks for your advices, I'll take a look on all and post what I conclude on it. Maybe I'm not clear enought, I already had CentOS5.8 Xen on my Hosts, but I'm finding a solution more enterprise. The HA/Load

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Options!

On 11/01/2012 07:42 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 11/01/2012 06:53 AM, Antonio da Silva Martins Junior wrote: Hi folks, Thanks for your advices, I'll take a look on all and post what I conclude on it. Maybe I'm not clear enought, I already had CentOS5.8 Xen on my Hosts, but I'm

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Options!

- Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org escreveu: De: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org Para: centos@centos.org Enviadas: Quinta-feira, 1 de Novembro de 2012 10:55:05 (GMT-0300) Auto-Detected Assunto: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Options! On 11/01/2012 07:42 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 11

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Options!

On 11/01/2012 12:42 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: If you are looking for Cloud stacks and not just Virtualization, then take a good look at Eucalyptus: http://www.eucalyptus.com/ Here is a faststart install video, which could not be easier to get started with:

[CentOS] Virtualization Options!

Hi, I'm searching for virtualization options. I already take a look on VMware, but it needs too much MS software to work for my needs. Citrix needs less, but the key validation is still MS-AD. Now I'm taking a look at RHEV... and run into Oracle VM! Somebody had already take a look at

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Options!

On 10/31/2012 01:40 PM, Antonio da Silva Martins Junior wrote: Hi, I'm searching for virtualization options. I already take a look on VMware, but it needs too much MS software to work for my needs. Citrix needs less, but the key validation is still MS-AD. Now I'm taking a look at

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Options!

On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 03:40:05PM -0200, Antonio da Silva Martins Junior wrote: Hi, I'm searching for virtualization options. I already take a look on VMware, but it needs too much MS software to work for my needs. Citrix needs less, but the key validation is still MS-AD.

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Options!

On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, Stephen Harris wrote: I'm still using KVM, but using with kickstart rather than templates. I switched from Xen (and, before that, VMware) to KVM about eighteen months or so ago just to see what the fuss was about, and have not looked back. I have since deployed about

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Options!

On 31.10.2012 17:40, Antonio da Silva Martins Junior wrote: Hi, I'm searching for virtualization options. KVM+libvirt, definitely (+VirtManager as desktop GUI). It's a fantastic match. Might be worth looking at openstack, too, it's all the rage these days. It is also using kvm and

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Options!

On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 1:40 AM, Antonio da Silva Martins Junior asmart...@uem.br wrote: Hi, I'm searching for virtualization options. I already take a look on VMware, but it needs too much MS software to work for my needs. Citrix needs less, but the key validation is still MS-AD. The

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization in CentOS 6

On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 12:11 AM, Joseph L. Casale jcas...@activenetwerx.com wrote: I'm not sure if this is what you're looking for, but ... /snip Yeah, that helps. Frankly, my use of vcenter has spoiled me, thinking I might try and find a way to utilize my desktop for esxi and work off a

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization in CentOS 6

If you like ESXi and have a windows box to run the client, why not use the free version? Under the original use case where I had to use the desktop to work also, I couldn't. In any case I would probably use a 'native' remote access method (freenx/NX for linux, VNC or remote desktop for

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization in CentOS 6

On 04/15/12 9:28 AM, Joseph L. Casale wrote: I'm comfortable doing everything I need to via ssh into the esxi server so I don't need the client really. All the Linux guests are console based, and for the windows guests I certainly use rdp if need be. how do you install a windows guest on ESXi

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization in CentOS 6

how do you install a windows guest on ESXi without the console provided by the GUI vSphere Client ? Painfully:) Actually its not that bad, 1. Setup a firewall rule for a port range to utilize multiple vnc consoles. 2. Take a copy of an existing platform compatible guests vmx, edit and create

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization in CentOS 6

On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 9:03 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote: On 04/13/12 8:25 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote: I might be needing to utilize one of the provided virtualization packages either in a headless console only setup of CentOS or on my desktop. I havent used anything but

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization in CentOS 6

Joseph L. Casale writes: I might be needing to utilize one of the provided virtualization packages either in a headless console only setup of CentOS or on my desktop. I havent used anything but ESXi in ages except virtualbox which I did not like at all. Most of the guests which I will

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization in CentOS 6

On 04/14/2012 05:04 AM, n...@li.nux.ro wrote: Joseph L. Casale writes: I might be needing to utilize one of the provided virtualization packages either in a headless console only setup of CentOS or on my desktop. I havent used anything but ESXi in ages except virtualbox which I did not

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization in CentOS 6

I'm not sure if this is what you're looking for, but ... /snip Yeah, that helps. Frankly, my use of vcenter has spoiled me, thinking I might try and find a way to utilize my desktop for esxi and work off a laptop... A colleague has kvm running so I will look at it... Thanks everybody, jlc

[CentOS] Virtualization in CentOS 6

I might be needing to utilize one of the provided virtualization packages either in a headless console only setup of CentOS or on my desktop. I havent used anything but ESXi in ages except virtualbox which I did not like at all. Most of the guests which I will need to run will be wnidows based

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization in CentOS 6

On 04/13/12 8:25 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote: I might be needing to utilize one of the provided virtualization packages either in a headless console only setup of CentOS or on my desktop. I havent used anything but ESXi in ages except virtualbox which I did not like at all. Most of the

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization platform choice

On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 08:59:09AM -0400, Steve Thompson wrote: On Mon, 28 Mar 2011, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 09:41:04AM -0400, Steve Thompson wrote: First. With Xen I was never able to start more than 30 guests at one time with any success; the 31st guest always failed

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization platform choice

On 29/03/11 21:13, Kenni Lund wrote: Den 29/03/2011 15.41 skrev David Sommerseth d...@users.sourceforge.net: [...snip...] Thanks a lot for good information! The main problem is Windows guests, which easily chokes on hardware changes (forced reactivation of Windows or unbootable with BSOD).

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization platform choice

2011/3/31 David Sommerseth d...@users.sourceforge.net: On 29/03/11 21:13, Kenni Lund wrote: The main problem is Windows guests, which easily chokes on hardware changes (forced reactivation of Windows or unbootable with BSOD). Each qemu-kvm version will behave differently, so moving from one

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization platform choice

On 27/03/11 11:57, Jussi Hirvi wrote: Some may be bored with the subject - sorry... Still not decided about virtualization platform for my webhotel v2 (ns, mail, web servers, etc.). KVM would be a natural way to go, I suppose, only it is too bad CentOS 6 will not be out in time for me -

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization platform choice

On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 2:41 PM, David Sommerseth d...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: On 27/03/11 11:57, Jussi Hirvi wrote: Some may be bored with the subject - sorry... Still not decided about virtualization platform for my webhotel v2 (ns, mail, web servers, etc.). KVM would be a natural

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization platform choice

Den 29/03/2011 15.41 skrev David Sommerseth d...@users.sourceforge.net: This makes me wondering how well it would go to migrate from SL6 to CentOS 6, if all KVM guests are on dedicated/separate LVM volumes and that you take a backup of /etc/libvirt.  So when CentOS6 is released, scratch SL6

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization platform choice

On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 09:41:04AM -0400, Steve Thompson wrote: The slightly longer story... First. With Xen I was never able to start more than 30 guests at one time with any success; the 31st guest always failed to boot or crashed during booting, no matter which guest I chose as the

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization platform choice

On Mon, 28 Mar 2011, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 09:41:04AM -0400, Steve Thompson wrote: First. With Xen I was never able to start more than 30 guests at one time with any success; the 31st guest always failed to boot or crashed during booting, no matter which guest I chose

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization platform choice

On 3/27/2011 3:07 PM, Jure Pečar wrote: It's interesting that nobody so far mentioned openVZ I wouldn't use it since being bitten by its lack of swap support. I run a couple of web sites on a fairly heavy web stack which loads up a bunch of dependencies that don't actually end up being used

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization platform choice

Please also consider OpenNode - http://opennode.activesys.org - a CentOS based KVM full virtualization + OpenVZ linux containers solution. Supports VM templating and live migration, etc - with easy bare metal setup. Cheers, -- -- Andres Toomsalu,

[CentOS] Virtualization platform choice

Some may be bored with the subject - sorry... Still not decided about virtualization platform for my webhotel v2 (ns, mail, web servers, etc.). KVM would be a natural way to go, I suppose, only it is too bad CentOS 6 will not be out in time for me - I guess KVM would be more mature in CentOS

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization platform choice

On 03/27/11 11:57, Jussi Hirvi wrote: Some may be bored with the subject - sorry... Still not decided about virtualization platform for my webhotel v2 (ns, mail, web servers, etc.). KVM would be a natural way to go, I suppose, only it is too bad CentOS 6 will not be out in time for me - I

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization platform choice

On 03/27/2011 02:57 AM, Jussi Hirvi wrote: Some may be bored with the subject - sorry... Still not decided about virtualization platform for my webhotel v2 (ns, mail, web servers, etc.). KVM would be a natural way to go, I suppose, only it is too bad CentOS 6 will not be out in time for me

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization platform choice

Any experience with the free VMware vSphere Hypervisor?. (It was formerly known as VMware ESXi Single Server or free ESXi.) http://www.vmware.com/products/vsphere-hypervisor/overview.html I would need a tutorial about that... For example, does that run without a host OS? Can it be managed

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization platform choice

2011/3/27 Drew drew@gmail.com: Any experience with the free VMware vSphere Hypervisor?. (It was formerly known as VMware ESXi Single Server or free ESXi.) http://www.vmware.com/products/vsphere-hypervisor/overview.html I would need a tutorial about that... For example, does that run

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization platform choice

On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Drew drew@gmail.com wrote: Any experience with the free VMware vSphere Hypervisor?. (It was formerly known as VMware ESXi Single Server or free ESXi.) http://www.vmware.com/products/vsphere-hypervisor/overview.html I would need a tutorial about that...

  1   2   3   >