Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

2016-10-05 Thread Tony Schreiner
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 1:15 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 10/04/2016 03:24 AM, Leon Fauster wrote: > >> This can be accomplished by just this (generates ifcfg files etc): >> >> # virsh iface-bridge eth0 br0 >> > > > Brilliant! I'm not sure why I haven't noticed that

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

2016-10-04 Thread TE Dukes
> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Gordon Messmer > Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 1:18 PM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking > > On 10/04/2016 04:18 A

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

2016-10-04 Thread J Martin Rushton
On 04/10/16 11:24, Leon Fauster wrote: > Am 04.10.2016 um 08:46 schrieb Gordon Messmer : >> On 10/03/2016 07:00 PM, TE Dukes wrote: >>> /etc/sysconfig/ifcfg-eth1 >>> GATEWAY=192.168.1.1 >> ... >>> /etc/sysconfig/ifcfg-lo >>> GATEWAY=192.168.1.1 >> >> Don't specify

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

2016-10-04 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 10/04/2016 04:18 AM, TE Dukes wrote: I disabled NetworkManager and created one. You don't need to do that on CentOS 7, and I wouldn't recommend it. Use NetworkManager where it works. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

2016-10-04 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 10/04/2016 03:24 AM, Leon Fauster wrote: This can be accomplished by just this (generates ifcfg files etc): # virsh iface-bridge eth0 br0 Brilliant! I'm not sure why I haven't noticed that in the docs, before. I've definitely been to the page where Red Hat documents it... Thanks.

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

2016-10-04 Thread Richard
> Date: Monday, October 03, 2016 22:00:07 -0400 > From: TE Dukes > > I posted some files previously but that was like 20 or so installs > ago. I don't know the files you need. >From what you've indicated, you appear to be deleting/reinstalling when the networking

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

2016-10-04 Thread Leon Fauster
Am 04.10.2016 um 08:46 schrieb Gordon Messmer : > On 10/03/2016 07:00 PM, TE Dukes wrote: >> /etc/sysconfig/ifcfg-eth1 >> GATEWAY=192.168.1.1 > ... >> /etc/sysconfig/ifcfg-lo >> GATEWAY=192.168.1.1 > > Don't specify GATEWAY in interface files where it isn't used. This

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

2016-10-04 Thread TE Dukes
> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Gordon Messmer > Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 2:47 AM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking > > On 10/03/2016

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

2016-10-04 Thread TE Dukes
> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Richard > Sent: Monday, October 3, 2016 10:41 PM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking > > > > > Date: Monday

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

2016-10-04 Thread TE Dukes
> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of John R Pierce > Sent: Monday, October 3, 2016 10:18 PM > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking > > On 10/3/2016 7:00 P

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

2016-10-04 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 10/03/2016 07:00 PM, TE Dukes wrote: /etc/sysconfig/ifcfg-eth1 GATEWAY=192.168.1.1 ... /etc/sysconfig/ifcfg-lo GATEWAY=192.168.1.1 Don't specify GATEWAY in interface files where it isn't used. This should be set on eth0 only. # brctl show bridge name bridge id STP

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

2016-10-03 Thread Richard
> Date: Monday, October 03, 2016 22:00:07 -0400 > From: TE Dukes > >> From: Gordon Messmer >> Sent: Monday, October 3, 2016 4:25 PM >> >> On 10/03/2016 04:54 AM, TE Dukes wrote: >> > I can get the guest to access the internet but have tried every >> > was possible

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

2016-10-03 Thread John R Pierce
On 10/3/2016 7:00 PM, TE Dukes wrote: 4: vboxnet0: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UNKNOWN qlen 1000 link/ether 0a:00:27:00:00:00 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff are there any other /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg- files beyond the ones you listed? -- john r

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

2016-10-03 Thread TE Dukes
> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Gordon Messmer > Sent: Monday, October 3, 2016 4:25 PM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking > > On 10/03/2016 04:54 A

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

2016-10-03 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 10/03/2016 04:54 AM, TE Dukes wrote: I can get the guest to access the internet but have tried every was possible to be able to access the guest from the LAN or even the host. Nothing I have tried works. The only thing all documentation leaves out is how to set up the guest networking during

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

2016-10-03 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 07:54:36AM -0400, TE Dukes wrote: > > OK, I'm about done trying to get this to work. I have spent HOURS reading, > installing, re-installing, etc. > > I can get the guest to access the internet but have tried every was possible > to be able to access the guest from the

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

2016-10-03 Thread TE Dukes
-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Liam O'Toole Sent: Monday, October 3, 2016 10:28 AM To: centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking On 2016-10-03, TE Dukes <tdu...@palmettoshopper.com>

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

2016-10-03 Thread Liam O'Toole
; [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On >> >> Behalf Of Michael Cole Sent: Friday, September 30, 2016 9:41 PM >> >> To: centos@centos.org Subject: Re: >> >> [CentOS] Virtualization Networking >> >> >> >> Deletion does not remove all, Try a erase

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

2016-10-03 Thread TE Dukes
> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Liam O'Toole > Sent: Monday, October 3, 2016 9:19 AM > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking > > On 201

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

2016-10-03 Thread Liam O'Toole
gt; centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] >> Virtualization Networking >> >> Deletion does not remove all, Try a erase if that did not work. >> >> Configuration files are not always where you expect then to be. >> >> Regards Michael Cole >> >> On Friday,

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

2016-10-03 Thread Gianluca Cecchi
gt; > To: centos@centos.org > > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking > > > > Deletion does not remove all, Try a erase if that did not work. > > > > Configuration files are not always where you expect then to be. > > > > Regards Michael Cole

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

2016-10-03 Thread TE Dukes
> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Michael Cole > Sent: Friday, September 30, 2016 9:41 PM > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking > > Deletion does not

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

2016-09-30 Thread TE Dukes
I deleted all virtualization packages and re-installed. Something must have been hosed up. Installing a VM and it didn't even ask to setup the network. Hopefully that's a good sign. Will know shortly TIA ___ CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

2016-09-30 Thread TE Dukes
> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Richard > Sent: Friday, September 30, 2016 8:50 AM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking > > > > > Date: Fr

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

2016-09-30 Thread Richard
> Date: Friday, September 30, 2016 07:14:59 -0400 > From: TE Dukes >> From: Gordon Messmer >> Sent: Friday, September 30, 2016 1:01 AM >> >> On 09/29/2016 07:54 PM, TE Dukes wrote: >> > For whatever reason, the default NAT setup no longer works. >> >> Start over

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

2016-09-30 Thread TE Dukes
> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Gordon Messmer > Sent: Friday, September 30, 2016 1:01 AM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking > > On 09/29/2016

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

2016-09-29 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 09/29/2016 07:54 PM, TE Dukes wrote: For whatever reason, the default NAT setup no longer works. Start over with a new install. Record each change you make, carefully. I got some kind of bridge network (mactap) setup that has access to the outside but I still can't connect locally. As

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

2016-09-29 Thread TE Dukes
> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Gordon Messmer > Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 11:47 AM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking > > On

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

2016-09-29 Thread TE Dukes
> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of John R Pierce > Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2016 2:16 PM > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking > > On

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

2016-09-29 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 09/28/2016 08:43 AM, tdu...@palmettoshopper.com wrote: I have one of those free domains/DNS from no-ip.com, centos7vm.ddns.net I plan to use as the host name. I want to be able to access this VM from the internet. ... This is what I was seeing. Either it lands on the DSL router's login

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

2016-09-28 Thread John R Pierce
On 9/28/2016 11:09 AM, tdu...@palmettoshopper.com wrote: I guess this is why I'm confused. I thought a VM could be setup as its own domain with all available services. it can, if its got its own internet IP address... but if you're on consumer internet, with only one public IP address, then

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

2016-09-28 Thread tdukes
Original Message Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking From: Warren Young <w...@etr-usa.com> Date: Wed, September 28, 2016 1:19 pm To: CentOS mailing list <centos@centos.org> On Sep 28, 2016, at 9:43 AM, <tdu...@palmettoshopper.com> <tdu..

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

2016-09-28 Thread tdukes
Original Message Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking From: John R Pierce <pie...@hogranch.com> Date: Wed, September 28, 2016 12:54 pm To: CentOS mailing list <centos@centos.org> On 9/28/2016 8:43 AM, tdu...@palmettoshopper.com wrote: > I'm a

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

2016-09-28 Thread Warren Young
On Sep 28, 2016, at 9:43 AM, wrote: > > The first one, I created in my / file system but didn't really have the > space so I deleted it. One of the primary advantages of VMs over real machines is that you can pause them, move them, and

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking

2016-09-28 Thread John R Pierce
On 9/28/2016 8:43 AM, tdu...@palmettoshopper.com wrote: I'm a little confused on which networking option I need to choose when setting up a VM. the host thats running the VM, is it connected to a LAN behind a firewall/router, or directly to the internet? if directly, is there a dedicated

[CentOS] Virtualization Networking

2016-09-28 Thread tdukes
Hello, I'm a little confused on which networking option I need to choose when setting up a VM. I set up two VMs this past weekend both with NAT. Both able to were access the internet. The first one, I created in my / file system but didn't really have the space so I deleted it. The second one,