nate wrote:
Alford, Seth wrote:
I'm looking for the anaconda source rpm. Yes, I know, it's
available from the upstream vendor.
this site seems to have it:
ftp://ftp.sunet.se/pub/os/Linux/distributions/centos/5.3/os/i386/CentOS/anaconda-11.1.2.168-1.el5.centos.i386.rpm
How is that a
Michael Holmes wrote:
Coming later. Please let the mirrors handle the load of people updating
their machines first. When the first wave of updates have gone down, the
SRPMS will be put onto the mirrors.
Not to be Mr. Goody Two Shoes, but isn't that a GPL violation? Seeing
as you can make
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
What probably should be done next time is to at least offer the SRPMS of
modified packages at release time, as you can get the other SRPMS from
somewhere else until the CentOS mirrors have synced up.
I have actually plumbed this into the scripts now, so all pkgs with a
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 10:31:37AM -0700, Alford, Seth wrote:
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 12:22:05PM +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
James Pearson wrote:
Is there _any_ chance the 5.3 SRPMS could be made available somehow -
e.g. on a single server, before they are pushed out to the mirrors?
Alford, Seth wrote:
I'm looking for the anaconda source rpm. Yes, I know, it's
available from the upstream vendor.
http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/4/idpl/12378998/com/anaconda-11.1.2.168-1.el5.centos.i386.rpm.html
this site seems to have it:
2009/4/1 Ralph Angenendt ra+cen...@br-online.de:
Steve Snyder wrote:
It seems that the mirrors are now all sync'd with the binary RPMs, but
where are the source packages?
The source RPMs are available for the few packages updated since the
upstream 5.3 release, but the SRPMS for the release
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Michael Holmes
holmesm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Not to be Mr. Goody Two Shoes, but isn't that a GPL violation? Seeing
as you can make an RPM from an SRPM but not vice versa, and the source
is what the GPL focuses on.
Please read the first few messages in the
On Wed, 08 Apr 2009 21:32:36 +0100
Michael Holmes wrote:
Not to be Mr. Goody Two Shoes, but isn't that a GPL violation? Seeing
as you can make an RPM from an SRPM but not vice versa, and the source
is what the GPL focuses on.
I'm not any kind of a legal expert, but I suspect that the concept
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Coming later. Please let the mirrors handle the load of people updating
their machines first. When the first wave of updates have gone down, the
SRPMS will be put onto the mirrors.
Is there _any_ chance the 5.3 SRPMS could be made available somehow -
e.g. on a single
James Pearson wrote:
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
The source RPMs are available for the few packages updated since the
upstream 5.3 release, but the SRPMS for the release itself are
missing.
I'm rather sure that I didn't write that.
Ralph
pgpf9OkyYiVUJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
James Pearson wrote:
Is there _any_ chance the 5.3 SRPMS could be made available somehow -
e.g. on a single server, before they are pushed out to the mirrors?
I would like to have a look at a couple of CentOS modified SRPMS
The src's and debuginfo's are uploading now ( they have been for
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
The source RPMs are available for the few packages updated since the
upstream 5.3 release, but the SRPMS for the release itself are
missing.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Steve Snyder wrote:
It seems that the mirrors are now all sync'd with the binary RPMs, but
where are the source packages?
The source RPMs are available for the few packages updated since the
upstream 5.3 release, but the SRPMS for the release itself are
missing.
Coming later. Please let
From: Steve Snyder swsny...@snydernet.net
It seems that the mirrors are now all sync'd with the binary RPMs, but
where are the source packages?
I think I read, a few posts ago, something about source rpms being delayed a
bit to reduce the traffic...
JD
Ralph Angenendt napsal(a):
Coming later. Please let the mirrors handle the load of people updating
their machines first. When the first wave of updates have gone down, the
SRPMS will be put onto the mirrors.
Regards,
Ralph,
I don´t like this solution. When things go wrong I want to look at
On 04/01/09 14:45, David Hrb?? enlightened us:
Ralph Angenendt napsal(a):
Coming later. Please let the mirrors handle the load of people updating
their machines first. When the first wave of updates have gone down, the
SRPMS will be put onto the mirrors.
Regards,
Ralph,
I don?t
Matthew Hyclak wrote:
On 04/01/09 14:45, David Hrb?? enlightened us:
Ralph Angenendt napsal(a):
Coming later. Please let the mirrors handle the load of people updating
their machines first. When the first wave of updates have gone down, the
SRPMS will be put onto the mirrors.
I don?t like
From: David Hrbáč hrbac.c...@seznam.cz
Ralph Angenendt napsal(a):
Coming later. Please let the mirrors handle the load of people updating
their machines first. When the first wave of updates have gone down, the
SRPMS will be put onto the mirrors.
Ralph,
I don´t like this solution. When
David Hrbáč wrote:
Ralph Angenendt napsal(a):
Coming later. Please let the mirrors handle the load of people updating
their machines first. When the first wave of updates have gone down, the
SRPMS will be put onto the mirrors.
Regards,
Ralph,
I don´t like this solution. When things go
John Doe wrote:
Why don't you just wait until the mirors are fully in sync (srpms included)?
Waiting for a few extra hours should not be that big of a deal...
Because it will be more than a few extra hours.
Ralph
pgppdLq9lotP1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
From: Ralph Angenendt ra+cen...@br-online.de
John Doe wrote:
Why don't you just wait until the mirors are fully in sync (srpms included)?
Waiting for a few extra hours should not be that big of a deal...
Because it will be more than a few extra hours.
Like... 6 months?
My point was that
David Hrbáč wrote:
Ralph Angenendt napsal(a):
Coming later. Please let the mirrors handle the load of people updating
their machines first. When the first wave of updates have gone down, the
SRPMS will be put onto the mirrors.
Regards,
Ralph,
I don´t like this solution. When things go
Fabian Arrotin napsal(a):
Right, if you don't like this solution, feel free to take a RHN
account .. btw you can always fetch Upstream SRPMs , no ?
Fabian,
well, I've got feeling that the mantra is get the RH for every point
coming out from the community. What do I have to think about this
John Doe wrote:
From: Ralph Angenendt ra+cen...@br-online.de
John Doe wrote:
Why don't you just wait until the mirors are fully in sync (srpms included)?
Waiting for a few extra hours should not be that big of a deal...
Because it will be more than a few extra hours.
Like... 6 months?
My
Fabian Arrotin wrote:
David Hrbáč wrote:
Ralph Angenendt napsal(a):
Coming later. Please let the mirrors handle the load of people updating
their machines first. When the first wave of updates have gone down, the
SRPMS will be put onto the mirrors.
Regards,
Ralph,
I don´t like this
David Hrbáč wrote:
Fabian Arrotin napsal(a):
Right, if you don't like this solution, feel free to take a RHN
account .. btw you can always fetch Upstream SRPMs , no ?
Fabian,
well, I've got feeling that the mantra is get the RH for every point
coming out from the community. What do I have
Michael A. Peters wrote:
However, I don't believe it needs to be made available by http, CentOS
would probably be in GPL compliance if they distributed it on IBM punch
cards to those who requested it.
FLOPPY DISKS! FOR A MEDIA HANDLING FEE of $5/disk!
(thats totally legal per GPL, the
On Wed, 2009-04-01 at 11:35 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
Michael A. Peters wrote:
However, I don't believe it needs to be made available by http, CentOS
would probably be in GPL compliance if they distributed it on IBM punch
cards to those who requested it.
FLOPPY DISKS! FOR A
On Wed, 2009-04-01 at 11:21 -0700, Michael A. Peters wrote:
John Doe wrote:
From: Ralph Angenendt ra+cen...@br-online.de
John Doe wrote:
Why don't you just wait until the mirors are fully in sync (srpms
included)?
Waiting for a few extra hours should not be that big of a deal...
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Well, technically the source has to be made available from CentOS to
anyone they distribute the software to.
However, I don't believe it needs to be made available by http, CentOS
would probably be in GPL compliance if they distributed it on IBM punch
cards to
John R Pierce wrote:
FLOPPY DISKS! FOR A MEDIA HANDLING FEE of $5/disk!
(thats totally legal per GPL, the recipient is free to redistribute any
way they wish)
The recipient - yes. The distributor - no.
Ralph
pgpt3hDwpUlS8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
31 matches
Mail list logo
