I need to restructure my server farm from tower PC:s to a minimal amount
of 1U rack servers. I am going to rely on xen virtualization, as KVM
seems not to be very mature yet.
My current problem is the mail server, which uses a lot of CPU and I/O.
A dedicated machine would be the best option.
I need to restructure my server farm from tower PC:s to a minimal amount
of 1U rack servers. I am going to rely on xen virtualization, as KVM
seems not to be very mature yet.
My current problem is the mail server, which uses a lot of CPU and I/O.
A dedicated machine would be the best option.
On 4.3.2011 10.52, Simon Matter wrote:
I don't know if it's recommended that way but at least it works fine.
Hm, that is kind of the only important thing. :-)
If it is not recommended, there have to be better reasons for that than
mere tidiness.
- Jussi
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 11:11:52AM +0200, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
On 4.3.2011 10.52, Simon Matter wrote:
I don't know if it's recommended that way but at least it works fine.
Hm, that is kind of the only important thing. :-)
If it is not recommended, there have to be better reasons for that
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 11:37:08AM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 11:11:52AM +0200, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
On 4.3.2011 10.52, Simon Matter wrote:
I don't know if it's recommended that way but at least it works fine.
Hm, that is kind of the only important thing. :-)
On Fri, 4 Mar 2011, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
I need to restructure my server farm from tower PC:s to a minimal
amount of 1U rack servers. I am going to rely on xen virtualization,
as KVM seems not to be very mature yet.
What part of KVM seems immature to you? I deploy public-facing
machines
What part of KVM seems immature to you? I deploy public-facing
machines using both it and Xen, and I can't really speak to any
difference in performance or small-scall management.
I like kvm - no issues
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
7 matches
Mail list logo
