Lanny Marcus wrote:
On 4/22/09, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
Michael Holmes wrote:
snip
I have always wondered about the sanity of using python for system
administration tools, but this should be a yum file in /usr/share/yum-cli/.
I found i18n on my CentOS 5.3 Desktop. It's
Rob Kampen wrote:
there was an issue with the update to 5.3 in that the glibc libraries
needed to be updated prior to the remainder otherwise rpm had issues -
this is probably what yum is choking on
No. Completely different beast.
Ralph
pgpaWPCBnHWcP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Dan Roberts wrote:
Ok - something truly bad appears to have happened.Yes, I will
concede that cycling the system was a bad thing - but after two hours
it should have returned from the update, still I was bad.
There are indeed updates that it wants - and I went back to the site
to
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Dan Roberts d...@jlazyh.com wrote:
I will start reading again and striving to improve things. I have
previously taken steps to secure the server, and was under the
impression that it was so.
Dan: After you get the server running properly again, you might go to
thanks for the details - As the server lives in a closet without a
monitor on it or even easy access I opted for Webmin so as to have the
ability to get in and work with it.
I will resubscribe and get back into a better habit - I had been
checking every day a year ago, and then life got
Dan Roberts wrote:
thanks for the details - As the server lives in a closet without a
monitor on it or even easy access I opted for Webmin so as to have the
ability to get in and work with it.
I will resubscribe and get back into a better habit - I had been
checking every day a year
Hmmm -
# rpm -uv glibc*
-uv: unknown option
Ok - so I go with -Uv instead
# rpm -Uv glibc*
error: File not found by glob: glibc*
But this is strange because I know that glib-2.0 is there - fairly
easy to confirm - is something missing?
# locate glibc
/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include/glibconfig.h
Jim Perrin wrote:
So you probably missed the notes and announcements about the 5.3
release, as well as the release notes about upgrade hiccups.
You guys just have to screw up more often to keep everyone on their toes.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com
Dan Roberts wrote:
thanks for the details - As the server lives in a closet without a
monitor on it or even easy access I opted for Webmin so as to have the
ability to get in and work with it.
I think most people on this list would recommend using ssh + screen for
remote administration, not
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 13:28 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Jim Perrin wrote:
So you probably missed the notes and announcements about the 5.3
release, as well as the release notes about upgrade hiccups.
You guys just have to screw up more often to keep everyone on their toes.
that
2009/4/22 Dan Roberts d...@jlazyh.com:
thanks for the details - As the server lives in a closet without a
monitor on it or even easy access I opted for Webmin so as to have the
ability to get in and work with it.
I will resubscribe and get back into a better habit - I had been
checking every
Given the mess that I have already got, would you care to provide a
clear list of the steps to do that - I certainly don't want to blow a
hole in something else by mistake.
On Apr 22, 2009, at 12:37 PM, Michael Holmes wrote:
2009/4/22 Dan Roberts d...@jlazyh.com:
thanks for the details -
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Dan Roberts d...@jlazyh.com wrote:
thanks for the details - As the server lives in a closet without a
monitor on it or even easy access I opted for Webmin so as to have the
ability to get in and work with it.
There are other ways you can get into a headless
Craig White wrote:
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 13:28 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Jim Perrin wrote:
So you probably missed the notes and announcements about the 5.3
release, as well as the release notes about upgrade hiccups.
You guys just have to screw up more often to keep everyone on their toes.
Thanks -
I will start reading again and striving to improve things. I have
previously taken steps to secure the server, and was under the
impression that it was so.
that aside - I can't run the command you suggest because any yum
operation results in the same error message.
# yum clean
2009/4/22 Dan Roberts d...@jlazyh.com:
Given the mess that I have already got, would you care to provide a
clear list of the steps to do that - I certainly don't want to blow a
hole in something else by mistake.
Can you tell me what version Python is? A simple python -v (without
quotes of
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Dan Roberts d...@jlazyh.com wrote:
I will start reading again and striving to improve things. I have
previously taken steps to secure the server, and was under the
impression that it was so.
I hope so. If not, you have a tiger by the tail.
that aside - I
2009/4/22 Lanny Marcus lmmailingli...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Dan Roberts d...@jlazyh.com wrote:
I will start reading again and striving to improve things. I have
previously taken steps to secure the server, and was under the
impression that it was so.
I hope so. If not,
On 4/22/09, Michael Holmes holmesm...@googlemail.com wrote:
2009/4/22 Lanny Marcus lmmailingli...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Dan Roberts d...@jlazyh.com wrote:
I will start reading again and striving to improve things. I have
previously taken steps to secure the server, and
Dan Roberts wrote:
that aside - I can't run the command you suggest because any yum
operation results in the same error message.
# yum clean all yum update glibc\* yum update
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/yum, line 28, in ?
import yummain
File
On 4/22/09, Dan Roberts d...@jlazyh.com wrote:
I will start reading again and striving to improve things. I have
previously taken steps to secure the server, and was under the
impression that it was so.
If you were only updating every month or so, impossible for the server
to have been secure
Michael Holmes wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Dan Roberts d...@jlazyh.com wrote:
I will start reading again and striving to improve things. I have
previously taken steps to secure the server, and was under the
impression that it was so.
I hope so. If not, you have a tiger by the
My current version of python appears to be python 2.4.3
python - v (without quotes returned a slue of lines, but near the
bottom it said
Python 2.4.3 (#1, Jan 21 2009, 01:10:13)
[GCC 4.1.2 20071124 (Red Hat 4.1.2-42)] on linux2
As to the question below - I have that directory, but not that
On 4/22/09, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Dan Roberts d...@jlazyh.com wrote:
snip
that aside - I can't run the command you suggest because any yum
operation results in the same error message.
# yum clean all yum update glibc\* yum update
On 4/22/09, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
Michael Holmes wrote:
snip
I have always wondered about the sanity of using python for system
administration tools, but this should be a yum file in /usr/share/yum-cli/.
I found i18n on my CentOS 5.3 Desktop. It's in /etc/sysconfig/
Les Mikesell wrote:
Dan Roberts wrote:
that aside - I can't run the command you suggest because any yum
operation results in the same error message.
# yum clean all yum update glibc\* yum update
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/yum, line 28, in ?
import
Dan Roberts wrote:
My current version of python appears to be python 2.4.3
python - v (without quotes returned a slue of lines, but near the
bottom it said
Python 2.4.3 (#1, Jan 21 2009, 01:10:13)
[GCC 4.1.2 20071124 (Red Hat 4.1.2-42)] on linux2
As to the question below - I have that
Yes - I have it in that location too - but clearly it is not getting
found by yum
On Apr 22, 2009, at 1:23 PM, Lanny Marcus wrote:
On 4/22/09, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
Michael Holmes wrote:
snip
I have always wondered about the sanity of using python for system
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Dan Roberts d...@jlazyh.com wrote:
Hey there -
This morning I ran the yum updater through Webmin as I do every month
or so - after about two hours I realized that I still had the same
updating screen going - and no response. Seemed strange.
Simple
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 15:17, Dan Roberts d...@jlazyh.com wrote:
As to the question below - I have that directory, but not that file.
yum-3.2.8-9.el5.centos.2.1 (from CentOS 5.2) has /usr/share/yum-cli/i18n.py
yum-3.2.19-18.el5.centos (from CentOS 5.3) no longer has that file.
Probably
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 15:23, Lanny Marcus lmmailingli...@gmail.com wrote:
I have always wondered about the sanity of using python for system
administration tools, but this should be a yum file in /usr/share/yum-cli/.
I found i18n on my CentOS 5.3 Desktop. It's in /etc/sysconfig/
The
Hi Filipe -
Clearly I have indeed got things broken -
# rpm -q yum
package yum is not installed
So I downloaded the rpm for a reinstall as you suggested - but clearly
I have more to get and install -
I downloaded to my home directory and ran the rpm -Uvh from there
# rpm -Uvh --force
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 15:40, Dan Roberts d...@jlazyh.com wrote:
# rpm -Uvh --force yum-3.2.19-18.el5.centos.noarch.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
rpm = 0:4.4.2 is needed by yum-3.2.19-18.el5.centos.noarch
rpm-python is needed by yum-3.2.19-18.el5.centos.noarch
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 13:40 -0600, Dan Roberts wrote:
Hi Filipe -
Clearly I have indeed got things broken -
# rpm -q yum
package yum is not installed
So I downloaded the rpm for a reinstall as you suggested - but clearly
I have more to get and install -
I downloaded to my home
Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 15:40, Dan Roberts d...@jlazyh.com wrote:
# rpm -Uvh --force yum-3.2.19-18.el5.centos.noarch.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
rpm = 0:4.4.2 is needed by yum-3.2.19-18.el5.centos.noarch
rpm-python is needed by
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 16:00, Craig White craigwh...@azapple.com wrote:
I wouldn't recommend that you use '--force' for any rpm commands unless
you know what you're doing.
I suggested the --force just in case the RPM database already had the
yum package registered, but the package was
Ok - something truly bad appears to have happened.Yes, I will
concede that cycling the system was a bad thing - but after two hours
it should have returned from the update, still I was bad.
There are indeed updates that it wants - and I went back to the site
to get them, but then things
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 16:06 -0400, Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 16:00, Craig White craigwh...@azapple.com wrote:
I wouldn't recommend that you use '--force' for any rpm commands unless
you know what you're doing.
I suggested the --force just in case the RPM
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 15:05 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Once yum is basically working you might be able to
yum install yum-utils
and
yum-complete-transaction
to pick up where you left off. I had to do this on one box where the
update process kicked me off and died with a bunch of duplicate
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 14:06 -0600, Dan Roberts wrote:
snip
I know very little about this, but maybe Felipe et al can fill in the
holes.
I recall times that folks on the list indicated an rpm rebuild db be
done. Is that possibly needed here?
Did the glibc get updated? If so/not what should be
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 16:06, Dan Roberts d...@jlazyh.com wrote:
There are indeed updates that it wants - and I went back to the site
to get them, but then things continue to show up as missing.
# rpm -Uvh --force rpm-4.4.2-48.el5.i386.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
Craig White wrote:
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 15:05 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Once yum is basically working you might be able to
yum install yum-utils
and
yum-complete-transaction
to pick up where you left off. I had to do this on one box where the
update process kicked me off and died with
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 15:37 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Craig White wrote:
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 15:05 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Once yum is basically working you might be able to
yum install yum-utils
and
yum-complete-transaction
to pick up where you left off. I had to do this on
on 4-22-2009 11:18 AM Dan Roberts spake the following:
Hmmm -
# rpm -uv glibc*
-uv: unknown option
Ok - so I go with -Uv instead
# rpm -Uv glibc*
error: File not found by glob: glibc*
But this is strange because I know that glib-2.0 is there - fairly
easy to confirm - is something
44 matches
Mail list logo
