Hello,
Kinda confused, will CentOS new SIGs: CentOS Storage, CentOS Cloud, and
CentOS Virtualization, CentOS Core,etc be a developmental path to future
RHEL releases, or will they continue be an exact clone of RHEL, like
Centos currently is?
Initial reaction: Crap!
One of the best things about CentOS, in my opinion, was not having to deal
with all the different RHEL builds/releases/whatever they called them, and
just having ONE distribution.
So much for that.
It didn't take long for Red Hat to get their mitts all over CentOS, huh?
On 03/31/2014 07:28 AM, Phelps, Matt wrote:
Initial reaction: Crap!
One of the best things about CentOS, in my opinion, was not having to deal
with all the different RHEL builds/releases/whatever they called them, and
just having ONE distribution.
This doesn't change. It's the core sig.
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 8:58 AM, Jim Perrin jper...@centos.org wrote:
On 03/31/2014 07:28 AM, Phelps, Matt wrote:
Initial reaction: Crap!
One of the best things about CentOS, in my opinion, was not having to
deal
with all the different RHEL builds/releases/whatever they called them,
On 03/31/2014 04:56 AM, Edward M wrote:
Hello,
Kinda confused, will CentOS new SIGs: CentOS Storage, CentOS Cloud, and
CentOS Virtualization, CentOS Core,etc be a developmental path to future
RHEL releases, or will they continue be an exact clone of RHEL, like
Centos currently is?
On 03/31/2014 08:16 AM, Phelps, Matt wrote:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 8:58 AM, Jim Perrin jper...@centos.org wrote:
On 03/31/2014 07:28 AM, Phelps, Matt wrote:
Initial reaction: Crap!
One of the best things about CentOS, in my opinion, was not having to
deal
with all the different RHEL
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Jim Perrin jper...@centos.org wrote:
On 03/31/2014 08:16 AM, Phelps, Matt wrote:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 8:58 AM, Jim Perrin jper...@centos.org wrote:
On 03/31/2014 07:28 AM, Phelps, Matt wrote:
Initial reaction: Crap!
One of the best things
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 09:49:53AM -0400, Phelps, Matt wrote:
OK, I'll calm down. Perhaps what you've said could have been communicated
by the article. This line is what troubled me:
Do keep in mind that the article in question was written by a tech journalist
and includes independent analysis
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 10:02 AM, Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm.org wrote:
Do keep in mind that the article in question was written by a tech
journalist
and includes independent analysis and opinion. It isn't direct
communication
from Red Hat or CentOS.
Yes, I see that now.
Is the talk by
On 03/31/2014 08:49 AM, Phelps, Matt wrote:
aggressive snipping
OK, I'll calm down. Perhaps what you've said could have been communicated
by the article. This line is what troubled me:
So what the newly united Red Hat and
Phelps, Matt wrote:
Initial reaction: Crap!
One of the best things about CentOS, in my opinion, was not having to deal
with all the different RHEL builds/releases/whatever they called them, and
just having ONE distribution.
So much for that.
It didn't take long for Red Hat to get their
On 3/31/2014 6:26 AM, Jim Perrin wrote:
On 03/31/2014 04:56 AM, Edward M wrote:
Hello,
Kinda confused, will CentOS new SIGs: CentOS Storage, CentOS Cloud, and
CentOS Virtualization, CentOS Core,etc be a developmental path to future
RHEL releases, or will they continue be an exact clone of
12 matches
Mail list logo
