I think so, at least you do the way I use it because you boot the
machine off the Clonezilla CD, then mount the device/partition you're
backing up to and select the device/partition being backed up.
But Clonezilla also has a whole network mode of operation involving a
Clonezilla server, so I
admin wrote:
I think so, at least you do the way I use it because you boot the
machine off the Clonezilla CD, then mount the device/partition you're
backing up to and select the device/partition being backed up.
But Clonezilla also has a whole network mode of operation involving a
Clonezilla
on: Sun Jun 22 08:00:34 UTC 2008, Gergely Buday gbuday at gmail.com wrote:
Dear CentOs users,
I have a centos server with nothing important at the moment, but I
would like to install some web-based project management tool (trac for
the curious) that would contain important data. And, as my
Yep, and USB external hard drives are even cheaper per GB.
Here in Australia an 8G USB stick retails for around AU$50, while a 250G
2.5 external HDD is around AU$140 by comparison (about 1/10 the cost
per GB).
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Sunday 22 June 2008 15:27:34 Les Mikesell wrote:
Anne
Do you need to shut your machine down to use clonezilla? After a quick skim
of the site, I can't find anything that says you don't.
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 7:27 AM, Les Mikesell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anne Wilson wrote:
I've had good results using Clonezilla for complete backup of
Gary Richardson wrote:
Do you need to shut your machine down to use clonezilla? After a quick
skim of the site, I can't find anything that says you don't.
Yes, Clonezilla is a LiveCD which you boot from to clone the disk so
your machine will be offline during this process.
Gergely Buday wrote:
Dear CentOs users,
I have a centos server with nothing important at the moment, but I
would like to install some web-based project management tool (trac for
the curious) that would contain important data. And, as my network is
growing the configuration of the server is
Dear CentOs users,
I have a centos server with nothing important at the moment, but I
would like to install some web-based project management tool (trac for
the curious) that would contain important data. And, as my network is
growing the configuration of the server is becoming complex. I would
I've had good results using Clonezilla for complete backup of OS+data.
It backs up entire disks/partitions, so includes everything including
configuration files, tweaks etc. It is fast compared to something like
Ghost, and can backup to devices (USB stick or external HDD) or a
network
On Sunday 22 June 2008 09:37:38 admin wrote:
I've had good results using Clonezilla for complete backup of OS+data.
Is there any compression? Does it span multiple CDs if necessary?
Anne
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://www.rsnapshot.org/
2008/6/22 Anne Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sunday 22 June 2008 09:37:38 admin wrote:
I've had good results using Clonezilla for complete backup of OS+data.
Is there any compression? Does it span multiple CDs if necessary?
Anne
Anne Wilson wrote:
I've had good results using Clonezilla for complete backup of OS+data.
Is there any compression? Does it span multiple CDs if necessary?
It does an image copy and knows enough about most filesystems to only
copy the used portions of the disk. Yes it compresses, no
On Sunday 22 June 2008 15:27:34 Les Mikesell wrote:
Anne Wilson wrote:
I've had good results using Clonezilla for complete backup of OS+data.
Is there any compression? Does it span multiple CDs if necessary?
It does an image copy and knows enough about most filesystems to only
copy the
We are migrating an LTO2 library off Veritas and NTBackup on a Windows Server
to a Linux Server with either Bacula or Amanda. Originally, the Windows server
used scripts to sync changes from various other Windows servers using Robocopy
to a locally attached set of volumes, then ran the backup
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
We are migrating an LTO2 library off Veritas and NTBackup on a Windows Server
to a Linux Server with either Bacula or Amanda. Originally, the Windows server
used scripts to sync changes from various other Windows servers using Robocopy
to a locally attached set of
Rsync directly from the target would be more efficient. I've never been
able to make this work using cygwin sshd on the windows side to accept
the connection and run rsync, but that could be a bug that is fixed now.
It will work using rsync in daemon mode on the windows side, or
initiating
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
Rsync directly from the target would be more efficient. I've never been
able to make this work using cygwin sshd on the windows side to accept
the connection and run rsync, but that could be a bug that is fixed now.
It will work using rsync in daemon mode on the windows
I can't install cygwin or a daemon for that matter on the Windows
Server, but I could execute a scheduled job to run a Widows port of
rsync on the file server which I am not opposed to at all. My only
problem with that is how do I then trigger the Bacula server to begin
the dump to tape once
After a moment or two of digging:
http://www.bacula.org/en/dev-manual/Tips_Suggestions.html#19274
Run Before Job = ShellScriptShownBelow
Shawn
On Sunday 16 March 2008, Shawn Everett wrote:
I can't install cygwin or a daemon for that matter on the Windows
Server, but I could execute a
On Sun, 2008-03-16 at 14:15 -0600, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
We are migrating an LTO2 library off Veritas and NTBackup on a Windows
Server to a Linux Server with either Bacula or Amanda. Originally, the
Windows server used scripts to sync changes from various other Windows
servers using Robocopy
20 matches
Mail list logo
