On 10/10/2015 2:06 PM, Leandro wrote:
So, I would like to ask to comunity, which are the new methods for
clustering and get HA and where to get updated documentation.
I contend the appropriate approach to HA should be based on what
services you need to keep available. an HA file server has
Thanks for pointing that.
I would like to learn about clustering and HA, so if I have to chose a
service for my testing scenario It will be a radius or a mysql justo to
keep it simple.
Leandro.
On 10/10/15 18:49, John R Pierce wrote:
On 10/10/2015 2:06 PM, Leandro wrote:
So, I would like
-cluster-with-centos-7/
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
> From: "Leandro" <ingrog...@gmail.com>
> To: centos@centos.org
> Sent: Saturday, 10 October, 2015 22:06:38
> Subject: [CentOS] Clustering and h
The main mailing list for HA clustering in "Clusterlabs Users":
http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users.
It's not strictly for any OS, but RHEL/CentOS and SUSE are probably the
most common OSes.
I might recommend starting with this:
https://alteeve.ca/w/History_of_HA_Clustering
The
Hello , Centos users:
My name is Leandro, I have been using Centos for 4 years and this is the
first post in this mail list.
I would like to study and introduce myself in clustering and high
availability for Centos, currently I have not experience at all about it.
I would like to ask about the
On Jan 10, 2012, at 2:59 PM, Rafał Radecki radecki.ra...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all.
I am currently working for a hosting provider in a 100+ linux hosts'
environment. We have www, mail HA solutions, as storage we mainly use
NFS at the moment. We are also using DRBD, Heartbeat, Corosync.
I
Hi all.
I am currently working for a hosting provider in a 100+ linux hosts'
environment. We have www, mail HA solutions, as storage we mainly use
NFS at the moment. We are also using DRBD, Heartbeat, Corosync.
I am now gathering info to make a cluster with:
- two virtualization nodes (active
I am currently working for a hosting provider in a 100+ linux hosts'
environment. We have www, mail HA solutions, as storage we mainly use
NFS at the moment. We are also using DRBD, Heartbeat, Corosync.
I am now gathering info to make a cluster with:
- two virtualization nodes (active
On 01/10/2012 02:59 PM, Rafał Radecki wrote:
Hi all.
I am currently working for a hosting provider in a 100+ linux hosts'
environment. We have www, mail HA solutions, as storage we mainly use
NFS at the moment. We are also using DRBD, Heartbeat, Corosync.
I am now gathering info to make a
- Original Message -
| Hey folks,
|
| I just went through the archives trying to find some info on this but
| did not come up with much other than it seems there are a few experts
| here on the list.
|
| I have no experience with clustering and have just taken over a Stem
| Cell Research
Le 16/11/2011 04:09, Tony Schreiner a écrit :
I recommend you check out ROCKS
http://www.rocksclusters.org
CentOS based clustering with lots of built in goodness.
Hi,
I also recommend Rocks Cluster, that I used on my site. Recently, they
switch to OGS, Open Grid Schduler, the open source
Hey folks,
I just went through the archives trying to find some info on this but
did not come up with much other than it seems there are a few experts
here on the list.
I have no experience with clustering and have just taken over a Stem
Cell Research Lab that has a Grid Engine cluster. I have
I recommend you check out ROCKS
http://www.rocksclusters.org
CentOS based clustering with lots of built in goodness.
Tony Schreiner
On 11/15/2011 9:50 PM, Alan McKay wrote:
Hey folks,
I just went through the archives trying to find some info on this but
did not come up with much other than
On 11/15/11 7:09 PM, Tony Schreiner wrote:
I recommend you check out ROCKS
http://www.rocksclusters.org
awhile back I setup a little test OSCAR cluster, which used CentOS, and
found it quite nicely packaged and easy to deploy with a rich set of
tools... but I have no idea where its gone
On 11/15/2011 09:50 PM, Alan McKay wrote:
Basically I'd like to get up to speed really quickly on different
clustering technologies, and maybe even set up a CentOS (or
Scientific) based cluster in a sandbox to play with.
I guess - looking for reading to get up to speed on clustering, and
I'm a greenhorn when it comes to clustering in RHEL/CentOS and recently setup
an active/standby clustering using Apache Heartbeat. It seems to be a good
entry step into clustering however after testing it I was disappointed in that
the resource manager does not start httpd on node2 if httpd on
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 10:27 -0600, Dan Burkland wrote:
I’m a greenhorn when it comes to clustering in RHEL/CentOS and
recently setup an active/standby clustering using Apache Heartbeat.
It seems to be a good entry step into clustering however after testing
it I was disappointed in that the
On 2/17/2010 10:27 AM, Dan Burkland wrote:
I’m a greenhorn when it comes to clustering in RHEL/CentOS and recently
setup an active/standby clustering using Apache Heartbeat. It seems to
be a good entry step into clustering however after testing it I was
disappointed in that the resource
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Les Mikesell
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 10:37 AM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Clustering apache
On 2/17/2010 10:27 AM, Dan Burkland wrote:
I'm a greenhorn
Hi,
On 2/4/2010 3:17 PM, Bo Lynch wrote:
Right know we have about 30 or so linux servers scattered through out
or
district. Was looking at ways of consolidating and some sort of
redundancy
would be nice.
Will clustering not work with certain apps? We have a couple mysql
dbases,
On Thu, February 4, 2010 6:18 pm, Drew wrote:
Right know we have about 30 or so linux servers scattered through out or
district. Was looking at ways of consolidating and some sort of
redundancy
would be nice.
I'm in the process of going through something like that right now. The
solution
On Thu, February 4, 2010 6:34 pm, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 2/4/2010 3:17 PM, Bo Lynch wrote:
Right know we have about 30 or so linux servers scattered through out or
district. Was looking at ways of consolidating and some sort of
redundancy
would be nice.
Will clustering not work with certain
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Bo Lynch bly...@ameliaschools.com wrote:
On Thu, February 4, 2010 6:18 pm, Drew wrote:
Right know we have about 30 or so linux servers scattered through out or
district. Was looking at ways of consolidating and some sort of
redundancy
would be nice.
I'm in
On Fri, February 5, 2010 8:03 am, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Bo Lynch bly...@ameliaschools.com wrote:
On Thu, February 4, 2010 6:18 pm, Drew wrote:
Right know we have about 30 or so linux servers scattered through out
or
district. Was looking at ways of
Bo Lynch wrote:
Currently we are doing the low tech method. Daily and weekly backups both
onsite and off along with RAID and all that other good stuff. I was just
wondering if clustering was a better way of handling things. Thanks for
the info.
If you are looking at VMware, ESX(i) is the
Bo Lynch wrote:
Whats your thoughts on Vmware server over esxi?
Really do not want to have to budget for Virtualization if I do not have to.
Depends on the hardware, ideally esxi, though it is very
picky about hardware.
And you should budget for it, storage will be a big concern if
you want
Whats your thoughts on Vmware server over esxi?
Really do not want to have to budget for Virtualization if I do not have to.
Thanks for any info.
Here is a comparison of VMware ESXi and Server notice that server
doesn't cost money.
http://www.vmware.com/products/server/faqs.html
both are
Bo Lynch wrote:
Currently we are doing the low tech method. Daily and weekly backups
both
onsite and off along with RAID and all that other good stuff. I was just
wondering if clustering was a better way of handling things. Thanks for
the info.
If you are looking at VMware, ESX(i) is the
Thanks for the info. Looks like VM would be the way to go. I have been
looking at Vmware and virtualbox. Would you recommend Vmware over
virtualbox?
Whats your thoughts on Vmware server over esxi?
Really do not want to have to budget for Virtualization if I do not have to.
I know some will
Bo Lynch wrote:
Whats your thoughts on Vmware server over esxi?
Really do not want to have to budget for Virtualization if I do not have to.
Thanks for any info.
There is a free version of ESXi - which is really the same as the paid version
with the cluster management and vmotion functions
When you talk about the free version are your referring to Vmware server
or is there a free version of Esxi? The website is a little misleading
with free trail and such.
ESXi is free to use. ESX / vSphere is the paid version.
--
Drew
Nothing in life is to be feared. It is only to be
On Fri, 2010-02-05 at 07:57 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
Bo Lynch wrote:
Currently we are doing the low tech method. Daily and weekly backups both
onsite and off along with RAID and all that other good stuff. I was just
wondering if clustering was a better way of handling things. Thanks
Drew wrote:
When you talk about the free version are your referring to Vmware server
or is there a free version of Esxi? The website is a little misleading
with free trail and such.
ESXi is free to use. ESX / vSphere is the paid version.
A common confusion point. While there is a free
On Fri, February 5, 2010 9:02 am, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
Whats your thoughts on Vmware server over esxi?
Really do not want to have to budget for Virtualization if I do not have
to.
Thanks for any info.
Here is a comparison of VMware ESXi and Server notice that server
doesn't cost money.
Bo Lynch wrote:
When you talk about the free version are your referring to Vmware server
or is there a free version of Esxi? The website is a little misleading
with free trail and such.
You have to register, but the way it works is that you download a full-featured
ESXi demo with a 30-day
Does anyone have any experience with KVM or OpenVZ? If I can stick to
something that is not proprietary that would be great. I didn't realize
there were so many options. Any info would be greatly appreciated.
Bo
KVM is easier (like VMware) than OpenVZ when using virt-manager to
manage
Athmane Madjoudj
Does anyone have any experience with KVM or OpenVZ? If I can stick to
something that is not proprietary that would be great. I didn't realize
there were so many options. Any info would be greatly appreciated.
Bo
___
If you
Bo Lynch sent a missive on 2010-02-05:
On Fri, February 5, 2010 9:02 am, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
Whats your thoughts on Vmware server over esxi?
Really do not want to have to budget for Virtualization if I do not
have to.
Thanks for any info.
Here is a comparison of VMware ESXi and Server
Whats your thoughts on Vmware server over esxi?
Really do not want to have to budget for Virtualization if I do not have
to.
Thanks for any info.
Here is a comparison of VMware ESXi and Server notice that server
doesn't cost money.
http://www.vmware.com/products/server/faqs.html
both
ESXi is free, but usable on one system. ESX is the full-blown version,
costs, and I *think* comes with the console... which, for some unknown
reason, is WinDoze *only*.
I believe both can be administered via browser.
maybe because there are more windows users that Linux and / or Mac OS
X and
Bo Lynch wrote:
Does anyone have any experience with KVM or OpenVZ? If I can stick to
something that is not proprietary that would be great. I didn't realize
there were so many options. Any info would be greatly appreciated.
Bo
Philosophically, I don't see how running on ESXi
nate wrote:
Bo Lynch wrote:
Whats your thoughts on Vmware server over esxi?
Really do not want to have to budget for Virtualization if I do not have to.
Depends on the hardware, ideally esxi, though it is very
picky about hardware.
And you should budget for it, storage will be a big
On Fri, February 5, 2010 9:55 am, Les Mikesell wrote:
Bo Lynch wrote:
Does anyone have any experience with KVM or OpenVZ? If I can stick to
something that is not proprietary that would be great. I didn't realize
there were so many options. Any info would be greatly appreciated.
Bo
On Fri, February 5, 2010 9:57 am, Les Mikesell wrote:
nate wrote:
Bo Lynch wrote:
Whats your thoughts on Vmware server over esxi?
Really do not want to have to budget for Virtualization if I do not
have to.
Depends on the hardware, ideally esxi, though it is very
picky about hardware.
Les Mikesell wrote:
Have you investigated any of the mostly-software alternatives for this like
openfiler, nexentastor, etc., or rolling your own iscsi server out of
opensolaris or centos?
I have and it depends on your needs. I ran Openfiler a couple years
ago with ESX and it worked ok. The
ESXi is free, but usable on one system. ESX is the full-blown version,
costs, and I *think* comes with the console... which, for some unknown
reason, is WinDoze *only*.
I believe both can be administered via browser.
maybe because there are more windows users that Linux and / or Mac OS
X
Except that VMware is *based* on RHEL. Why would you *not* have a
Linux-based console?
The best is to have a cross platform console because there a lot of
linux sysadmin (including me) who run linux as a primary desktop OS
--
Athmane Madjoudj
___
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Except that VMware is *based* on RHEL. Why would you *not* have a
Linux-based console?
A common misconception. The linux based console is a VM in itself,
and is used for management purposes only, it runs on top of the
hypervisor.
nate
On 2/5/2010 10:12 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
ESXi is free, but usable on one system. ESX is the full-blown version,
costs, and I *think* comes with the console... which, for some unknown
reason, is WinDoze *only*.
I believe both can be administered via browser.
maybe because there are more
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 7:53 AM, Athmane Madjoudj athma...@gmail.com wrote:
ESXi is free, but usable on one system. ESX is the full-blown version,
costs, and I *think* comes with the console... which, for some unknown
reason, is WinDoze *only*.
I believe both can be administered via browser.
On 2/5/2010 10:04 AM, nate wrote:
Have you investigated any of the mostly-software alternatives for this like
openfiler, nexentastor, etc., or rolling your own iscsi server out of
opensolaris or centos?
I have and it depends on your needs. I ran Openfiler a couple years
ago with ESX and it
On Feb 5, 2010, at 9:03 AM, Drew drew@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the info. Looks like VM would be the way to go. I have
been
looking at Vmware and virtualbox. Would you recommend Vmware over
virtualbox?
Whats your thoughts on Vmware server over esxi?
Really do not want to have to
Les Mikesell wrote:
Somewhere along the line they switch from a CentOS base to rpath for
better package management, but I haven't followed them since.
Yeah the version I had at the time was based on rPath, I think
they changed to something else yet again in the past year or
so.
trusted it
Just wanted to get the lists opinion on clustering and what project to
use. Any info would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
--
Bo Lynch
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Bo Lynch bly...@ameliaschools.com wrote:
Just wanted to get the lists opinion on clustering and what project to
use. Any info would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
There are all types of clustering. What are you looking to do?
On Thu, February 4, 2010 3:31 pm, Kwan Lowe wrote:
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Bo Lynch bly...@ameliaschools.com wrote:
Just wanted to get the lists opinion on clustering and what project to
use. Any info would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
There are all types of clustering. What are
Just wanted to get the lists opinion on clustering and what project to
use. Any info would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
There are all types of clustering. What are you looking to do?
I guess the main objective would be availability.
We need more information then just an Availability
On Thu, February 4, 2010 4:09 pm, Drew wrote:
Just wanted to get the lists opinion on clustering and what project to
use. Any info would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
There are all types of clustering. What are you looking to do?
I guess the main objective would be availability.
We need
Bo Lynch wrote:
Right know we have about 30 or so linux servers scattered through out or
district. Was looking at ways of consolidating and some sort of redundancy
would be nice.
Will clustering not work with certain apps? We have a couple mysql dbases,
oracle database, smb shares, nfs,
Right know we have about 30 or so linux servers scattered through out or
district. Was looking at ways of consolidating and some sort of redundancy
would be nice.
I'm in the process of going through something like that right now. The
solution we're pursuing is to virtualize our existing
On 2/4/2010 3:17 PM, Bo Lynch wrote:
Right know we have about 30 or so linux servers scattered through out or
district. Was looking at ways of consolidating and some sort of redundancy
would be nice.
Will clustering not work with certain apps? We have a couple mysql dbases,
oracle database,
Les Mikesell пишет:
Sergej Kandyla wrote:
nginx http_proxy module is universal complex solution. Also apache
working in prefork mode (in general cases), I don't know does
mod_jk\mod_proxy_ajp works in the worker-MPM mode...
In the preforking mode apache create a child on each incoming
Sergej Kandyla wrote:
In the preforking mode apache create a child on each incoming request,
so it's too much expensive for resource usage.
Have you actually measured this? Preforking apache doesn't fork per
request, it forks enough instances to accept the concurrent connection
Thanks for your reply
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 9:22 PM, J Potter jpotter-cen...@codepuppy.comwrote:
Look at pound: http://www.apsis.ch/pound/
If you are concerned about traffic volume, you might consider running
squid as a transparent proxy in front of pound. I.e.:
request - squid - pound
Hi,
Thanks for your reply,
If I have my content in a centralised system like amazon s3, will I have
problem syncronizing?
Thanks and Regards
Marky
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Sergej Kandyla sk.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Anto Marky пишет:
Hi,
I am new to clustering and loadbalancing in
Anto Marky wrote:
If I have my content in a centralised system like amazon s3, will I
have problem syncronizing?
s3 is an example of a DE-centralized distributed cloud system.
by the simple fact that you're asking such a vague and generic question,
I'd hazard to guess, yes, you will have
John R Pierce schrieb:
Anto Marky wrote:
If I have my content in a centralised system like amazon s3, will I
have problem syncronizing?
s3 is an example of a DE-centralized distributed cloud system.
by the simple fact that you're asking such a vague and generic question,
I'd
Rainer Duffner пишет:
Sergej Kandyla schrieb:
Hi,
apache is good as backend server for dynamic applications.
You could use something like nginx, haproxy as frontend for balancing
multiple backend servers.
I'm using nginx. This light web server could serve many thousand
concurrent
Florin Andrei пишет:
Sergej Kandyla wrote:
apache is good as backend server for dynamic applications.
You could use something like nginx, haproxy as frontend for balancing
multiple backend servers.
I'm using nginx. This light web server could serve many thousand
concurrent connections!
Sergej Kandyla wrote:
No, nginx could serve any kind of content via ngx_http_proxy_module
module http://wiki.codemongers.com/NginxHttpProxyModule
For example I'm using nginx as reverse proxy for tomcat
servers\applications.
Is there some advantage to this over apache with mod_jk?
--
Les Mikesell пишет:
Sergej Kandyla wrote:
No, nginx could serve any kind of content via ngx_http_proxy_module
module http://wiki.codemongers.com/NginxHttpProxyModule
For example I'm using nginx as reverse proxy for tomcat
servers\applications.
Is there some advantage to
Look at pound: http://www.apsis.ch/pound/
If you are concerned about traffic volume, you might consider running
squid as a transparent proxy in front of pound. I.e.:
request - squid - pound - apache
Where squid will return the response for everything marked as
cacheable and still fresh;
Sergej Kandyla wrote:
nginx http_proxy module is universal complex solution. Also apache
working in prefork mode (in general cases), I don't know does
mod_jk\mod_proxy_ajp works in the worker-MPM mode...
In the preforking mode apache create a child on each incoming request,
so it's too
Les Mikesell wrote:
It may be, but I'd like to see some real-world measurements. Most of
the discussions about more efficient approaches seem to use straw-man
arguments that aren't realistic about the way apache works or timings of
a few static pages under ideal conditions that don't match
J Potter wrote:
It's hard to get very specific about what's best for your setup
without know the specifics of things like the data sync needs on the
apache nodes, so take all of this with a grain of salt -- or as a
default starting place.
I did not ask anything related to my setup. I
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:50:34 -0800
Florin Andrei flo...@andrei.myip.org wrote:
I was just curious about performance comparisons between different types
of load balancers in general.
It's hard to say ... you usualy use load balancers to achieve higher
availability and put as little as possible
Anto Marky пишет:
Hi,
I am new to clustering and loadbalancing in apache, What is best way
of doing it? How do I do the clustering and what tools do I need to
use? Do I have those tools, I use CentOS , Do i have any tools in
CenOs which comes default in it? And how do I do apache load
Sergej Kandyla schrieb:
Hi,
apache is good as backend server for dynamic applications.
You could use something like nginx, haproxy as frontend for balancing
multiple backend servers.
I'm using nginx. This light web server could serve many thousand
concurrent connections! It works great!
Sergej Kandyla wrote:
apache is good as backend server for dynamic applications.
You could use something like nginx, haproxy as frontend for balancing
multiple backend servers.
I'm using nginx. This light web server could serve many thousand
concurrent connections! It works great!
In
Hi,
I am new to clustering and loadbalancing in apache, What is best way of
doing it? How do I do the clustering and what tools do I need to use? Do I
have those tools, I use CentOS , Do i have any tools in CenOs which comes
default in it? And how do I do apache load balancing? should I rely on
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Anto Marky markycen...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am new to clustering and loadbalancing in apache, What is best way of
doing it? How do I do the clustering and what tools do I need to use? Do I
have those tools, I use CentOS , Do i have any tools in CenOs which
Fajar Priyanto napsal(a):
This is a good start to give you some overview:
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-linux-ha/index.html
Then, you can go here:
http://code.google.com/p/ath/
David Hrbáč
___
CentOS mailing list
Hi,
Thanks for the link.
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Fajar Priyanto fajar...@arinet.orgwrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Anto Marky markycen...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am new to clustering and loadbalancing in apache, What is best way of
doing it? How do I do the clustering
Hi,
Thanks for the link.
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 12:50 PM, David Hrbáč hrbac.c...@seznam.cz wrote:
Fajar Priyanto napsal(a):
This is a good start to give you some overview:
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-linux-ha/index.html
Then, you can go here:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 1:21 AM, Anto Marky markycen...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the link.
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Fajar Priyanto fajar...@arinet.orgwrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Anto Marky markycen...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I am new to clustering and
On Dec 12, 2007 4:46 PM, Karanbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt Shields wrote:
I just got my master-master servers setup and we're running
mysql-server-5.0.48-1.el4.centos. I should also mention that Meetup
presentation was given by Patrick Galbraith who used to work for MySQL
and
On 11/12/2007 17:18, Steve Campbell wrote:
I'm just beginning to consider using the Clustering available with
CentOS. We are going to spec out some new hardware, and after reading
most of the Clustering manuals, I have a small question about MySQL.
I would like to run High Availability MySQL,
On Dec 11, 2007 12:42 PM, Karanbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt Shields wrote:
the code). But I saw a presentation at the Boston MySQL Meetup.com
group about how to do master-master in mysql 5. We're about to
implement this in the next few weeks. If it's done this way both
that
Matt Shields wrote:
I just got my master-master servers setup and we're running
mysql-server-5.0.48-1.el4.centos. I should also mention that Meetup
presentation was given by Patrick Galbraith who used to work for MySQL
and was responsible for adding replication to MySQL.
sounds good, will
I'm just beginning to consider using the Clustering available with
CentOS. We are going to spec out some new hardware, and after reading
most of the Clustering manuals, I have a small question about MySQL.
I would like to run High Availability MySQL, in other words, similar to
how you can run
On Dec 11, 2007 12:18 PM, Steve Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm just beginning to consider using the Clustering available with
CentOS. We are going to spec out some new hardware, and after reading
most of the Clustering manuals, I have a small question about MySQL.
I would like to run
Matt Shields wrote:
the code). But I saw a presentation at the Boston MySQL Meetup.com
group about how to do master-master in mysql 5. We're about to
implement this in the next few weeks. If it's done this way both
that is imho, a mysql-5.1 only feature, where you can have rbr and
On Dec 11, 2007, at 9:42 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Matt Shields wrote:
the code). But I saw a presentation at the Boston MySQL Meetup.com
group about how to do master-master in mysql 5. We're about to
implement this in the next few weeks. If it's done this way both
that is imho, a
- master A is at position X
- master B, replicating from A, gets to position X
- master A syncs to its filesystem that it's at position X
- master A receives some inserts, and is now at position Y
- master B, replicating from A, gets to position Y
- master A crashes before the position
On Dec 11, 2007, at 11:29 AM, Matt Shields wrote:
On Dec 11, 2007 1:39 PM, J. Potter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
... But I saw a presentation at the Boston MySQL Meetup.com
group about how to do master-master in mysql 5. We're about to
implement this in the next few weeks. ...
I've run
Ryan Ordway wrote:
Specifically, what makes you say it is a 5.1 only feature? What does 5.1
give you that makes it easier than 5.0?
specifically - rbr
we've had load of issues with mysql-5.0 recently ( i think were just
tryign to use mysql like too much of a real database, while we seem to
On Dec 11, 2007, at 2:44 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Ryan Ordway wrote:
Specifically, what makes you say it is a 5.1 only feature? What
does 5.1
give you that makes it easier than 5.0?
specifically - rbr
Ahh, true.
( i think were just tryign to use mysql like too much of a real
Matt Shields wrote:
If this were master-slave, I'd probably do an LVM Snapshot and get a
fresh copy of the master db. The same could be done for
master-master.
has a live lvm-snapshot ever worked for you as a real move-data-around
policy ? you would, at the very least, need to flush in
Ryan Ordway wrote:
The problem is you'll have some inconsistency between your master A's
view of the database and the master B's view. You lose any changes to
the data on master B. It would be nice to be able to merge any changes
from B that hadn't made their way to master A yet. At that point
Ryan Ordway wrote:
Ryan Ordway wrote:
Specifically, what makes you say it is a 5.1 only feature? What does 5.1
give you that makes it easier than 5.0?
specifically - rbr
Ahh, true.
( i think were just tryign to use mysql like too much of a real
database, while we seem to have clearly
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
