On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 11:27:27AM +0200, Bent Terp wrote:
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Adrian Sevcenco
adrian.sevce...@cern.ch wrote:
Hi,
What would you recommend as an FS for an partition greater than 16 TiB?
This is for an production server (that is, no ext4 recommendations
please
thus Pasi Kärkkäinen spake:
On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 11:27:27AM +0200, Bent Terp wrote:
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Adrian Sevcenco
adrian.sevce...@cern.ch wrote:
Hi,
What would you recommend as an FS for an partition greater than 16 TiB?
This is for an production server (that is, no
On Thursday 07 May 2009, Bent Terp wrote:
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen pa...@iki.fi wrote:
On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 11:27:27AM +0200, Bent Terp wrote:
We've got a 110 TB xfs system in production based on a logical volume
striped over 9 boxes of SATA disk, works like a
Hi,
What would you recommend as an FS for an partition greater than 16 TiB?
This is for an production server (that is, no ext4 recommendations
please :) )
What experiences did you had with your preferred FS ? (good and not so
good points)
Thank you,
Adrian
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME
Hi,
Hi,
What would you recommend as an FS for an partition greater than 16 TiB?
This is for an production server (that is, no ext4 recommendations
please :) )
What experiences did you had with your preferred FS ? (good and not so
good points)
Thank you,
Adrian
I personally would go
2009/5/6 Timo Schoeler timo.schoe...@riscworks.net:
Hi,
Hi,
What would you recommend as an FS for an partition greater than 16 TiB?
This is for an production server (that is, no ext4 recommendations
please :) )
What experiences did you had with your preferred FS ? (good and not so
good
Adrian Sevcenco schrieb:
Hi,
What would you recommend as an FS for an partition greater than 16 TiB?
This is for an production server (that is, no ext4 recommendations
please :) )
What experiences did you had with your preferred FS ? (good and not so
good points)
Thank you,
Adrian
Rainer Duffner wrote:
Adrian Sevcenco schrieb:
Hi,
What would you recommend as an FS for an partition greater than 16 TiB?
This is for an production server (that is, no ext4 recommendations
please :) )
What experiences did you had with your preferred FS ? (good and not so
good points)
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Adrian Sevcenco
adrian.sevce...@cern.ch wrote:
Hi,
What would you recommend as an FS for an partition greater than 16 TiB?
This is for an production server (that is, no ext4 recommendations
please :) )
What experiences did you had with your preferred FS ?
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Bent Terp b...@nagstrup.dk wrote:
Lesson learned: don't use xfs_grow unless you're in the general
vicinity of the server ;-)
Correction: the command is xfs_growfs not xfs_grow
/B
___
CentOS mailing list
Adrian Sevcenco schrieb:
Rainer Duffner wrote:
Adrian Sevcenco schrieb:
Hi,
What would you recommend as an FS for an partition greater than 16 TiB?
This is for an production server (that is, no ext4 recommendations
please :) )
What experiences did you had with your preferred FS ?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
tthus Rainer Duffner spake:
| Adrian Sevcenco schrieb:
| Rainer Duffner wrote:
|
| Adrian Sevcenco schrieb:
|
| Hi,
| What would you recommend as an FS for an partition greater than 16 TiB?
| This is for an production server (that is, no ext4
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org
[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Ralph Angenendt
Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 3:55 AM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] fs for 16 TiB partition
Rainer Duffner wrote:
It's running in a datacenter
Timo Schoeler wrote:
However, one has to clearly distinct JFS from JFS2... (at least in the
AIX world, see wikipedia which states 'In the other operating systems,
such as OS/2 and Linux, only the second generation exists and is called
simply JFS.[3] This should not be confused with JFS in AIX
14 matches
Mail list logo
